CLM vs CET

Comparison between Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund (CLM, ETF) and Central Securities Corp (CET, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceCET has outperformed CLM, delivering a return of +12.4% compared to +9.3%

CLM vs CET - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CLM(ETF)	CET(ETF)
Net Assets	$1.90B	$1.90B
Max Drawdown	95.94%	73.29%
Sharpe Ratio	0.54	1.32
5Y Beta	0.77	0.66
5Y Dividends CAGR	-4.69%	7.95%

Net Assets

CLM

$1.90B

CET

$1.90B

Max Drawdown

CLM

95.94%

Winner

CET

73.29%

Sharpe Ratio

CLM

0.54

Winner

CET

1.32

5Y Beta

CLM

0.77

Winner

CET

0.66

5Y Dividends CAGR

CLM

-4.69%

Winner

CET

7.95%

CLM vs CET - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CLM	CET
1 month	+2.30%	+5.82%
3 months	+3.28%	+5.07%
6 months	+2.09%	+7.43%
1 year	+11.84%	+20.78%
5 years(CAGR)	+9.25%	+12.38%
10 years(CAGR)	+11.62%	+16.66%
Max(CAGR)	+7.84%	+10.54%

CLM

+2.30%

Winner

CET

+5.82%

CLM

+3.28%

Winner

CET

+5.07%

CLM

+2.09%

Winner

CET

+7.43%

CLM

+11.84%

Winner

CET

+20.78%

5Y(CAGR)

CLM

+9.25%

Winner

CET

+12.38%

10Y(CAGR)

CLM

+11.62%

Winner

CET

+16.66%

Max(CAGR)

CLM

+7.84%

Winner

CET

+10.54%

CLM vs CET - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CLM	CET
2026	+0.13%	+10.40%
2025	+18.62%	+18.04%
2024	+40.94%	+27.16%
2023	+14.01%	+18.42%
2022	-37.33%	-19.07%
2021	+41.69%	+51.39%
2020	+28.35%	+3.77%
2019	+21.58%	+37.54%
2018	-12.84%	-4.99%
2017	+22.10%	+30.57%
2016	+20.14%	+23.34%
2015	-2.17%	-3.98%
2014	-7.67%	+10.24%
2013	+27.45%	+26.91%
2012	+7.67%	+0.99%
2011	-13.23%	-2.98%
2010	-12.17%	+26.25%
2009	+76.34%	+24.89%
2008	-52.53%	-37.04%
2007	-31.87%	+10.42%
2006	+34.86%	+20.89%
2005	-5.70%	+14.55%
2004	+7.15%	+16.40%
2003	+75.52%	+34.25%
2002	+2.95%	-30.41%
2001	N/A	-1.71%
2000	N/A	+16.42%
1999	N/A	+12.25%

CLM vs CET Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CLM was -76.82%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 3296 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CET was -56.58%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 663 trading sessions.

The current CLM drawdown is -0.93%.

Rank	CLM	CET
#1	-76.82% Jul 9, 2007 - Aug 10, 2020	-56.58% May 16, 2008 - Jan 3, 2011
#2	-43.43% Apr 5, 2022 - Nov 12, 2024	-50.75% Sep 1, 2000 - Dec 1, 2005
#3	-31.50% Feb 11, 2005 - Jul 3, 2006	-39.91% Jan 16, 2020 - Dec 7, 2020
#4	-23.87% Feb 13, 2025 - Jul 24, 2025	-24.88% Dec 30, 2021 - Mar 7, 2024
#5	-19.14% Apr 12, 2021 - Sep 1, 2021	-22.78% May 31, 2011 - Jul 15, 2013
#6	-18.63% Sep 6, 2002 - Nov 22, 2002	-18.50% Dec 23, 2014 - Jun 6, 2016
#7	-16.15% Feb 11, 2004 - Jan 6, 2005	-16.78% Aug 29, 2018 - Mar 14, 2019
#8	-15.01% Nov 10, 2006 - Mar 2, 2007	-15.46% Jul 17, 2007 - May 15, 2008
#9	-14.58% Jan 14, 2026 - Mar 27, 2026	-15.42% Feb 19, 2025 - Jul 2, 2025
#10	-12.73% Jan 14, 2003 - Apr 17, 2003	-14.88% Mar 28, 2000 - Jun 27, 2000
#11	-10.86% Dec 4, 2024 - Feb 5, 2025	-11.45% Jul 23, 2014 - Dec 23, 2014
#12	-10.18% Nov 12, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022	-9.96% Jan 17, 2018 - Jun 8, 2018
#13	-9.29% May 1, 2007 - Jun 8, 2007	-8.08% Mar 2, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026
#14	-8.09% Feb 3, 2021 - Mar 8, 2021	-7.69% Jan 27, 2006 - Oct 12, 2006
#15	-6.72% Jan 12, 2022 - Feb 8, 2022	-7.56% Jul 20, 2000 - Aug 18, 2000

Correlation

Correlation between CLM and CET is 0.95 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.95

-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CLM vs CET dividend yield comparison.

Year	CLM	CET
2026	11.26%	0.56%
2025	17.48%	5.32%
2024	15.17%	4.92%
2023	20.50%	4.90%
2022	29.45%	7.34%
2021	13.45%	8.41%
2020	18.96%	5.68%
2019	21.98%	3.78%
2018	25.39%	5.84%
2017	18.04%	3.65%
2016	22.44%	4.50%
2015	28.20%	10.41%
2014	23.00%	7.97%
2013	18.58%	17.03%
2012	22.18%	4.70%
2011	23.23%	4.89%
2010	18.98%	4.10%
2009	18.05%	3.62%
2008	54.62%	17.08%
2007	22.10%	8.94%
2006	12.36%	8.33%
2005	14.81%	8.40%
2004	12.27%	5.78%
2003	11.05%	6.70%
2002	7.05%	7.68%
2001	0.00%	7.11%
2000	0.00%	13.63%
1999	0.00%	8.81%