CLM vs CET

Comparison between Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund (CLM, ETF) and Central Securities Corp (CET, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceCET has outperformed CLM, delivering a return of +11.8% compared to +11.3%

CLM vs CET - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CLM(ETF)	CET(ETF)
Net Assets	$1.90B	$1.90B
Max Drawdown	95.94%	73.29%
Sharpe Ratio	0.73	1.20
5Y Beta	0.77	0.65
5Y Dividends CAGR	-4.92%	7.95%

Net Assets

CLM

$1.90B

CET

$1.90B

Max Drawdown

CLM

95.94%

Winner

CET

73.29%

Sharpe Ratio

CLM

0.73

Winner

CET

1.20

5Y Beta

CLM

0.77

Winner

CET

0.65

5Y Dividends CAGR

CLM

-4.92%

Winner

CET

7.95%

CLM vs CET - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CLM	CET
1 month	+2.44%	-0.31%
3 months	+7.35%	+5.79%
6 months	-0.00%	+5.26%
1 year	+15.09%	+18.07%
5 years(CAGR)	+11.33%	+11.81%
10 years(CAGR)	+12.45%	+16.47%
Max(CAGR)	+0.23%	+10.36%

Winner

CLM

+2.44%

CET

-0.31%

Winner

CLM

+7.35%

CET

+5.79%

CLM

-0.00%

Winner

CET

+5.26%

CLM

+15.09%

Winner

CET

+18.07%

5Y(CAGR)

CLM

+11.33%

Winner

CET

+11.81%

10Y(CAGR)

CLM

+12.45%

Winner

CET

+16.47%

Max(CAGR)

CLM

+0.23%

Winner

CET

+10.36%

CLM vs CET - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CLM	CET
2026	-2.38%	+4.37%
2025	+18.73%	+18.04%
2024	+41.31%	+27.16%
2023	+14.34%	+18.42%
2022	-37.13%	-19.07%
2021	+42.02%	+51.39%
2020	+28.78%	+3.77%
2019	+21.98%	+37.54%
2018	-12.57%	-4.99%
2017	+22.45%	+30.57%
2016	+20.56%	+23.34%
2015	-1.81%	-3.98%
2014	-19.98%	+10.24%
2013	+12.00%	+26.91%
2012	-6.03%	+0.99%
2011	-23.00%	-2.98%
2010	-21.54%	+26.25%
2009	+51.00%	+24.89%
2008	-63.47%	-37.04%
2007	-40.20%	+10.42%
2006	+18.41%	+20.89%
2005	-17.38%	+14.55%
2004	-4.29%	+16.40%
2003	+53.19%	+34.25%
2002	-3.66%	-30.41%
2001	N/A	-1.71%
2000	N/A	+16.42%
1999	N/A	+12.25%

CLM vs CET Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CLM was -86.03%, occurring on Jan 20, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for CET was -56.58%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 663 trading sessions.

The current CLM drawdown is -34.16%. The current CET drawdown is -2.08%.

Rank	CLM	CET
#1	-86.03% Feb 5, 2004 - Jan 20, 2016	-56.58% May 16, 2008 - Jan 3, 2011
#2	-19.67% Sep 6, 2002 - Jan 14, 2003	-50.75% Sep 1, 2000 - Dec 1, 2005
#3	-13.93% Jan 14, 2003 - May 12, 2003	-39.91% Jan 16, 2020 - Dec 7, 2020
#4	-6.56% Aug 2, 2002 - Aug 19, 2002	-24.88% Dec 30, 2021 - Mar 7, 2024
#5	-5.93% Aug 15, 2003 - Oct 3, 2003	-22.78% May 31, 2011 - Jul 15, 2013
#6	-4.47% Jul 1, 2003 - Jul 25, 2003	-18.50% Dec 23, 2014 - Jun 6, 2016
#7	-3.13% Jan 12, 2004 - Jan 23, 2004	-16.78% Aug 29, 2018 - Mar 14, 2019
#8	-3.07% Dec 3, 2003 - Dec 31, 2003	-15.46% Jul 17, 2007 - May 15, 2008
#9	-3.03% Jun 16, 2003 - Jun 30, 2003	-15.42% Feb 19, 2025 - Jul 2, 2025
#10	-2.93% Nov 10, 2003 - Nov 28, 2003	-14.88% Mar 28, 2000 - Jun 27, 2000
#11	-2.64% Jul 31, 2003 - Aug 11, 2003	-11.45% Jul 23, 2014 - Dec 23, 2014
#12	-2.45% Oct 9, 2003 - Oct 29, 2003	-9.96% Jan 17, 2018 - Jun 8, 2018
#13	-2.42% Aug 21, 2002 - Sep 6, 2002	-8.08% Mar 2, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026
#14	-2.16% Aug 11, 2003 - Aug 15, 2003	-7.69% Jan 27, 2006 - Oct 12, 2006
#15	-2.01% Jan 23, 2004 - Feb 5, 2004	-7.56% Jul 20, 2000 - Aug 18, 2000

Correlation

Correlation between CLM and CET is -0.03 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

-0.03

-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CLM vs CET dividend yield comparison.

Year	CLM	CET
2026	9.75%	0.59%
2025	17.57%	5.32%
2024	15.41%	4.92%
2023	20.82%	4.90%
2022	29.91%	7.34%
2021	13.67%	8.41%
2020	19.26%	5.68%
2019	22.33%	3.78%
2018	25.79%	5.84%
2017	18.33%	3.65%
2016	22.80%	4.50%
2015	28.65%	10.41%
2014	5.84%	7.97%
2013	4.72%	17.03%
2012	5.63%	4.70%
2011	5.90%	4.89%
2010	4.82%	4.10%
2009	4.58%	3.62%
2008	3.47%	17.08%
2007	1.40%	8.94%
2006	0.78%	8.33%
2005	0.94%	8.40%
2004	0.78%	5.78%
2003	0.70%	6.70%
2002	0.45%	7.68%
2001	0.00%	7.11%
2000	0.00%	13.63%
1999	0.00%	8.81%