CLH vs RMBS

Comparison between Clean Harbors Inc (CLH, Company) and Rambus Inc (RMBS, Company).

CLH is from the Industrials sector, while RMBS is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceRMBS has outperformed CLH, delivering a return of +44.7% compared to +26.8%

CLH vs RMBS - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CLH(COMPANY)	RMBS(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$15B	$15B
Max Drawdown	80.87%	97.16%
Sharpe Ratio	0.91	1.46
5Y Beta	0.80	2.55
Industry	Waste Management	Semiconductors
P/E Ratio	38.87	66.16
Forward P/E	33.67	24.15
PEG Ratio	17.48	6.45
5Y Dividends CAGR	125.50%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	23.04%	N/A
Debt to Equity	99.95%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	3.06%	2.20%

Market Cap

CLH

$15B

Winner

RMBS

$15B

Max Drawdown

Winner

CLH

80.87%

RMBS

97.16%

Sharpe Ratio

CLH

0.91

Winner

RMBS

1.46

5Y Beta

Winner

CLH

0.80

RMBS

2.55

Industry

CLH

Waste Management

RMBS

Semiconductors

P/E Ratio

Winner

CLH

38.87

RMBS

66.16

Forward P/E

CLH

33.67

Winner

RMBS

24.15

PEG Ratio

CLH

17.48

Winner

RMBS

6.45

5Y Dividends CAGR

CLH

125.50%

RMBS

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

CLH

23.04%

RMBS

N/A

Debt to Equity

CLH

99.95%

Winner

RMBS

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

CLH

3.06%

RMBS

2.20%

CLH vs RMBS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CLH	RMBS
1 month	-4.35%	+14.07%
3 months	-0.82%	+51.28%
6 months	+20.89%	+54.30%
1 year	+27.51%	+133.15%
5 years(CAGR)	+26.81%	+44.69%
10 years(CAGR)	+18.84%	+28.05%
Max(CAGR)	+33.21%	+8.37%

CLH

-4.35%

Winner

RMBS

+14.07%

CLH

-0.82%

Winner

RMBS

+51.28%

CLH

+20.89%

Winner

RMBS

+54.30%

CLH

+27.51%

Winner

RMBS

+133.15%

5Y(CAGR)

CLH

+26.81%

Winner

RMBS

+44.69%

10Y(CAGR)

CLH

+18.84%

Winner

RMBS

+28.05%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

CLH

+33.21%

RMBS

+8.37%

CLH vs RMBS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CLH	RMBS
2026	+18.55%	+42.19%
2025	+2.17%	+71.76%
2024	+34.87%	-18.99%
2023	+53.43%	+94.89%
2022	+17.17%	+22.17%
2021	+33.54%	+67.94%
2020	-10.49%	+25.34%
2019	+72.54%	+71.97%
2018	-7.51%	-46.33%
2017	-2.78%	+0.42%
2016	+32.06%	+18.81%
2015	-14.07%	+1.13%
2014	-18.57%	+16.00%
2013	+10.14%	+80.73%
2012	-12.21%	-39.95%
2011	+202.04%	-63.17%
2010	+38.59%	-11.84%
2009	-6.38%	+39.51%
2008	+26.05%	-22.08%
2007	+9.89%	+9.29%
2006	+67.31%	+4.01%
2005	+115.12%	-29.24%
2004	+107.82%	-24.71%
2003	-33.48%	+332.39%
2002	+519.75%	-19.54%
2001	+129.79%	-76.42%
2000	+46.10%	+109.45%
1999	-16.67%	+1.60%

CLH vs RMBS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CLH was -77.69%, occurring on Oct 23, 2003. Recovery took 435 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for RMBS was -97.16%, occurring on Jun 26, 2002. Recovery took 6430 trading sessions.

The current CLH drawdown is -8.00%. The current RMBS drawdown is -17.28%.

Rank	CLH	RMBS
#1	-77.69% Dec 18, 2002 - Sep 13, 2004	-97.16% Jun 26, 2000 - Jan 21, 2026
#2	-64.51% Feb 20, 2020 - Feb 24, 2021	-66.16% Mar 13, 2000 - Jun 23, 2000
#3	-56.67% Mar 17, 2000 - Oct 22, 2001	-36.69% Jan 21, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026
#4	-54.43% May 20, 2002 - Nov 21, 2002	-29.75% Apr 24, 2026 - Jun 2, 2026
#5	-50.39% Aug 28, 2008 - Dec 20, 2010	-28.41% Nov 8, 1999 - Feb 14, 2000
#6	-44.03% Feb 23, 2012 - Sep 7, 2018	-23.77% Jun 3, 2026 - Jun 17, 2026
#7	-36.30% Oct 22, 2001 - Jan 29, 2002	-14.36% Feb 29, 2000 - Mar 6, 2000
#8	-34.99% Sep 7, 2018 - Mar 26, 2019	-11.61% Feb 15, 2000 - Feb 22, 2000
#9	-30.86% Oct 29, 2024 - Jan 15, 2026	-2.39% Feb 24, 2000 - Feb 28, 2000
#10	-30.19% Nov 7, 2005 - May 4, 2006	-1.17% Mar 7, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000
#11	-29.27% Nov 2, 2021 - Aug 12, 2022	-0.90% Feb 22, 2000 - Feb 24, 2000
#12	-28.02% Nov 5, 1999 - Jan 11, 2000	-0.05% Apr 17, 2026 - Apr 21, 2026
#13	-21.97% Jan 19, 2000 - Mar 3, 2000	N/A
#14	-21.04% Apr 10, 2002 - May 13, 2002	N/A
#15	-20.69% Jan 31, 2002 - Feb 25, 2002	N/A