StockComparison Logo
vs

CLH vs LAMR

Comparison between Clean Harbors Inc (CLH, Company) and Lamar Advertising Co - Class A (LAMR, Company).

CLH is from the Industrials sector, while LAMR is from the Real Estate sector.

5-Year PerformanceCLH has outperformed LAMR, delivering a return of +25.1% compared to +13.7%

CLH vs LAMR - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CLH
$15B
LAMR
$15B
Max Drawdown
Winner
CLH
80.87%
LAMR
92.26%
Sharpe Ratio
CLH
0.86
Winner
LAMR
1.47
5Y Beta
CLH
N/A
LAMR
0.81
Industry
CLH
Waste Management
LAMR
Reit - Specialty
P/E Ratio
CLH
39.26
Winner
LAMR
28.76
Forward P/E
CLH
34.25
Winner
LAMR
29.50
PEG Ratio
CLH
17.65
Winner
LAMR
4.00
Dividend Yield
CLH
N/A
LAMR
4.12%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
CLH
125.50%
LAMR
34.08%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
CLH
23.04%
LAMR
7.55%
Debt to Equity
Winner
CLH
99.95%
LAMR
356.02%
Free Cash Flow Yield
CLH
3.03%
Winner
LAMR
4.55%
P/S Ratio
Winner
CLH
2.54
LAMR
6.73
P/B Ratio
Winner
CLH
5.56
LAMR
15.63

CLH vs LAMR - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CLH
-5.74%
Winner
LAMR
+14.64%
3M
CLH
+2.17%
Winner
LAMR
+17.35%
6M
Winner
CLH
+32.20%
LAMR
+19.69%
1Y
CLH
+26.00%
Winner
LAMR
+40.56%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CLH
+25.07%
LAMR
+13.66%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CLH
+19.01%
LAMR
+14.45%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CLH
+33.29%
LAMR
+6.36%

CLH vs LAMR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCLHLAMR
2026+17.86%+24.82%
2025+2.17%+10.31%
2024+34.87%+19.69%
2023+53.43%+21.94%
2022+17.17%-18.41%
2021+33.54%+56.85%
2020-10.49%-2.55%
2019+72.54%+39.36%
2018-7.51%-0.05%
2017-2.78%+14.38%
2016+32.06%+18.04%
2015-14.07%+17.05%
2014-18.57%+9.01%
2013+10.14%+30.69%
2012-12.21%+37.02%
2011+202.04%-32.40%
2010+38.59%+23.23%
2009-6.38%+121.12%
2008+26.05%-73.62%
2007+9.89%-22.79%
2006+67.31%+41.51%
2005+115.12%+8.26%
2004+107.82%+13.90%
2003-33.48%+4.07%
2002+519.75%-20.62%
2001+129.79%+15.49%
2000+46.10%-36.34%
1999-16.67%+8.38%

CLH vs LAMR Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CLH was -77.69%, occurring on Oct 23, 2003. Recovery took 435 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for LAMR was -91.85%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2262 trading sessions.

The current CLH drawdown is -8.54%. The current LAMR drawdown is -3.06%.

RankCLHLAMR
#1-77.69%
Dec 18, 2002 - Sep 13, 2004
-91.85%
Jan 11, 2007 - Jan 6, 2016
#2-64.51%
Feb 20, 2020 - Feb 24, 2021
-65.88%
Feb 20, 2020 - Mar 5, 2021
#3-56.67%
Mar 17, 2000 - Oct 22, 2001
-60.77%
Feb 4, 2000 - Jan 10, 2007
#4-54.43%
May 20, 2002 - Nov 21, 2002
-30.05%
Dec 30, 2021 - Feb 22, 2024
#5-50.39%
Aug 28, 2008 - Dec 20, 2010
-23.85%
Oct 15, 2024 - Nov 21, 2025
#6-44.03%
Feb 23, 2012 - Sep 7, 2018
-18.81%
Dec 14, 2017 - Aug 16, 2018
#7-36.30%
Oct 22, 2001 - Jan 29, 2002
-18.30%
Feb 21, 2017 - Nov 7, 2017
#8-34.99%
Sep 7, 2018 - Mar 26, 2019
-18.10%
Nov 7, 2018 - Mar 4, 2019
#9-30.86%
Oct 29, 2024 - Jan 15, 2026
-17.39%
Jan 6, 2016 - Mar 17, 2016
#10-30.19%
Nov 7, 2005 - May 4, 2006
-13.11%
Jul 22, 2016 - Dec 19, 2016
#11-29.27%
Nov 2, 2021 - Aug 12, 2022
-12.55%
Nov 9, 2021 - Dec 29, 2021
#12-28.02%
Nov 5, 1999 - Jan 11, 2000
-11.63%
Jun 20, 2019 - Nov 15, 2019
#13-21.97%
Jan 19, 2000 - Mar 3, 2000
-11.43%
Dec 9, 1999 - Jan 25, 2000
#14-21.04%
Apr 10, 2002 - May 13, 2002
-11.34%
Jan 26, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000
#15-20.69%
Jan 31, 2002 - Feb 25, 2002
-10.05%
Mar 2, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026

Correlation

Correlation between CLH and LAMR is 0.93 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.93
-101

Dividend Comparison (2001 - 2026)

CLH vs LAMR dividend yield comparison.

YearCLHLAMR
20260.00%1.05%
20250.00%5.10%
20240.00%4.64%
20230.00%4.70%
20220.00%5.30%
20210.00%3.30%
20200.00%3.00%
20190.00%4.30%
20180.00%5.28%
20170.00%4.47%
20160.00%4.49%
20150.00%4.58%
20140.00%4.66%
201184.34%0.00%
20071.79%6.76%
20061.90%0.00%
20056.40%0.00%
200412.22%0.00%
200320.70%0.00%
200211.85%0.00%
200112.62%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare