CLFD vs CZFS

Comparison between Clearfield Inc (CLFD, Company) and Citizens Financial Services Inc (CZFS, Company).

CLFD is from the Technology sector, while CZFS is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceCZFS has outperformed CLFD, delivering a return of +9.9% compared to -6.9%

CLFD vs CZFS - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CLFD(COMPANY)	CZFS(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$396M	$394M
Max Drawdown	98.62%	56.28%
Sharpe Ratio	0.05	1.26
5Y Beta	1.44	0.82
Industry	Communication Equipment	Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio	-56.12	10.10
Forward P/E	24.88	9.27
PEG Ratio	N/A	0.24
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.48%
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	6.89%
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	10.04%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	5.95%	9.53%

Market Cap

Winner

CLFD

$396M

CZFS

$394M

Max Drawdown

CLFD

98.62%

Winner

CZFS

56.28%

Sharpe Ratio

CLFD

0.05

Winner

CZFS

1.26

5Y Beta

CLFD

1.44

Winner

CZFS

0.82

Industry

CLFD

Communication Equipment

CZFS

Banks - Regional

P/E Ratio

Winner

CLFD

-56.12

CZFS

10.10

Forward P/E

CLFD

24.88

Winner

CZFS

9.27

PEG Ratio

CLFD

N/A

CZFS

0.24

Dividend Yield

CLFD

N/A

CZFS

2.48%

5Y Dividends CAGR

CLFD

N/A

CZFS

6.89%

5Y EPS CAGR

CLFD

N/A

CZFS

10.04%

Debt to Equity

CLFD

0.00%

CZFS

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

CLFD

5.95%

Winner

CZFS

9.53%

CLFD vs CZFS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CLFD	CZFS
1 month	-12.22%	+14.60%
3 months	-32.39%	+30.73%
6 months	-12.06%	+29.86%
1 year	-15.05%	+42.33%
5 years(CAGR)	-6.87%	+9.87%
10 years(CAGR)	+3.83%	+9.80%
Max(CAGR)	+6.75%	+12.80%

CLFD

-12.22%

Winner

CZFS

+14.60%

CLFD

-32.39%

Winner

CZFS

+30.73%

CLFD

-12.06%

Winner

CZFS

+29.86%

CLFD

-15.05%

Winner

CZFS

+42.33%

5Y(CAGR)

CLFD

-6.87%

Winner

CZFS

+9.87%

10Y(CAGR)

CLFD

+3.83%

Winner

CZFS

+9.80%

Max(CAGR)

CLFD

+6.75%

Winner

CZFS

+12.80%

CLFD vs CZFS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CLFD	CZFS
2026	-2.54%	+49.16%
2025	-8.93%	-3.27%
2024	+4.06%	+3.35%
2023	-68.18%	-12.16%
2022	+17.16%	+31.15%
2021	+248.99%	+14.87%
2020	+77.46%	-4.54%
2019	+30.65%	+12.77%
2018	-17.68%	-7.82%
2017	-42.08%	+34.26%
2016	+58.38%	+13.55%
2015	+6.77%	-3.03%
2014	-35.18%	+8.49%
2013	+315.61%	+38.27%
2012	-39.89%	+29.99%
2011	+93.64%	-3.11%
2010	+58.82%	+47.79%
2009	+122.22%	+39.87%
2008	+4.00%	+3.26%
2007	-30.82%	-7.53%
2006	+3.62%	+13.12%
2005	-36.02%	-8.95%
2004	-6.76%	+4.26%
2003	+39.87%	+13.19%
2002	-52.66%	+64.92%
2001	-51.71%	+25.02%
2000	-52.06%	N/A
1999	+210.00%	N/A

CLFD vs CZFS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CLFD was -98.62%, occurring on Nov 28, 2008. Recovery took 5453 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CZFS was -54.99%, occurring on Apr 26, 2024. Recovery took 788 trading sessions.

The current CLFD drawdown is -78.16%. The current CZFS drawdown is -1.49%.

Rank	CLFD	CZFS
#1	-98.62% Feb 28, 2000 - Oct 28, 2021	-54.99% Jun 12, 2023 - Aug 4, 2026
#2	-82.52% Nov 30, 2022 - Oct 30, 2023	-40.57% Feb 14, 2020 - Jul 6, 2021
#3	-44.42% Dec 31, 2021 - Jul 28, 2022	-25.83% Jul 31, 2008 - Jul 20, 2009
#4	-31.44% Aug 24, 2022 - Nov 23, 2022	-24.55% Apr 29, 2003 - Apr 5, 2007
#5	-29.06% Dec 30, 1999 - Jan 18, 2000	-22.37% Aug 29, 2022 - Feb 6, 2023
#6	-26.27% Feb 7, 2000 - Feb 28, 2000	-22.21% Apr 19, 2007 - May 7, 2008
#7	-19.68% Jan 25, 2000 - Feb 2, 2000	-18.25% Feb 10, 2023 - Apr 10, 2023
#8	-15.63% Nov 15, 1999 - Dec 8, 1999	-17.50% Jul 29, 2011 - May 8, 2012
#9	-12.84% Nov 12, 2021 - Dec 15, 2021	-17.23% Mar 19, 2014 - Oct 11, 2016
#10	-11.12% Dec 8, 1999 - Dec 21, 1999	-16.91% Apr 20, 2023 - Jun 7, 2023
#11	-7.34% Nov 25, 2022 - Nov 30, 2022	-13.27% Oct 2, 2018 - Mar 29, 2019
#12	-7.26% Nov 3, 1999 - Nov 15, 1999	-11.51% Jan 11, 2011 - Jul 29, 2011
#13	-5.87% Jan 19, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000	-11.11% Jul 31, 2009 - Oct 21, 2009
#14	-3.40% Dec 22, 1999 - Dec 29, 1999	-10.45% Aug 17, 2010 - Nov 3, 2010
#15	-3.39% Aug 19, 2022 - Aug 23, 2022	-10.17% Apr 30, 2010 - Jul 19, 2010