CLF vs THG
Comparison between Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF, Company) and Hanover Insurance Group Inc (THG, Company).
CLF is from the Basic Materials sector, while THG is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceTHG has outperformed CLF, delivering a return of +11.4% compared to -9.5%
CLF vs THG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CLF vs THG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CLF vs THG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CLF | THG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -9.71% | +11.68% |
| 2025 | +39.20% | +22.40% |
| 2024 | -52.45% | +29.01% |
| 2023 | +21.62% | -8.17% |
| 2022 | -25.86% | +5.29% |
| 2021 | +50.97% | +16.88% |
| 2020 | +88.69% | -12.07% |
| 2019 | +10.16% | +28.32% |
| 2018 | -2.66% | +11.54% |
| 2017 | -16.26% | +21.12% |
| 2016 | +403.59% | +16.52% |
| 2015 | -77.52% | +17.70% |
| 2014 | -71.27% | +24.30% |
| 2013 | -30.80% | +56.55% |
| 2012 | -38.56% | +13.94% |
| 2011 | -23.00% | -23.17% |
| 2010 | +63.25% | +7.08% |
| 2009 | +57.60% | +5.78% |
| 2008 | -46.54% | -3.40% |
| 2007 | +112.27% | -5.87% |
| 2006 | +5.86% | +14.26% |
| 2005 | +76.79% | +29.10% |
| 2004 | +95.85% | +6.45% |
| 2003 | +147.09% | +204.96% |
| 2002 | +7.53% | -76.57% |
| 2001 | -14.70% | -33.33% |
| 2000 | -24.00% | +36.05% |
| 1999 | +8.53% | +1.24% |
CLF vs THG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CLF was -98.78%, occurring on Jan 12, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for THG was -89.84%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 3234 trading sessions.
The current CLF drawdown is -87.44%. The current THG drawdown is -0.87%.
| Rank | CLF | THG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.78% Jun 30, 2008 - Jan 12, 2016 | -89.84% Dec 29, 2000 - Nov 8, 2013 |
| #2 | -51.61% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002 | -40.84% Nov 8, 1999 - May 24, 2000 |
| #3 | -48.31% Apr 18, 2002 - Oct 13, 2003 | -40.05% Feb 4, 2020 - Apr 27, 2021 |
| #4 | -41.76% Mar 4, 2004 - Sep 2, 2004 | -30.38% Apr 20, 2022 - Aug 30, 2024 |
| #5 | -41.09% Feb 1, 2006 - Jan 30, 2007 | -18.50% Aug 21, 2018 - May 10, 2019 |
| #6 | -38.96% Mar 4, 2005 - Sep 28, 2005 | -17.77% Apr 1, 2016 - Dec 8, 2016 |
| #7 | -32.10% Jun 1, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 | -14.04% Aug 27, 2021 - Feb 3, 2022 |
| #8 | -27.95% Oct 12, 2007 - Dec 26, 2007 | -13.98% Apr 2, 2025 - May 30, 2025 |
| #9 | -21.75% Jan 5, 2004 - Feb 17, 2004 | -13.34% Jan 10, 2014 - Mar 31, 2014 |
| #10 | -20.24% Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 11, 2004 | -12.87% May 24, 2000 - Jul 27, 2000 |
| #11 | -18.57% Dec 28, 2007 - Feb 1, 2008 | -11.94% Oct 3, 2000 - Dec 7, 2000 |
| #12 | -17.14% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 1, 2008 | -11.73% Mar 15, 2017 - Jul 20, 2017 |
| #13 | -16.03% Sep 30, 2005 - Nov 9, 2005 | -11.07% Aug 16, 2017 - Oct 10, 2017 |
| #14 | -12.12% Jun 5, 2008 - Jun 23, 2008 | -10.68% Nov 11, 2015 - Mar 11, 2016 |
| #15 | -11.79% Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007 | -10.32% Nov 29, 2024 - Feb 6, 2025 |
Correlation
Correlation between CLF and THG is -0.21 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CLF vs THG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CLF | THG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.96% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 2.00% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 2.23% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 2.70% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 2.26% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 2.17% |
| 2020 | 0.82% | 2.27% |
| 2019 | 3.10% | 7.10% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 1.90% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 1.89% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 2.07% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 2.08% |
| 2014 | 8.40% | 2.13% |
| 2013 | 2.29% | 2.28% |
| 2012 | 5.59% | 3.18% |
| 2011 | 1.35% | 4.02% |
| 2010 | 0.65% | 2.14% |
| 2009 | 0.55% | 1.69% |
| 2008 | 1.37% | 1.05% |
| 2007 | 0.50% | 0.87% |
| 2006 | 0.98% | 0.61% |
| 2005 | 0.68% | 0.60% |
| 2004 | 0.19% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 9.90% |
| 2001 | 2.19% | 0.56% |
| 2000 | 6.96% | 0.34% |
| 1999 | 1.21% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks