CLF vs MAC
Comparison between Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF, Company) and Macerich Company (MAC, Company).
CLF is from the Basic Materials sector, while MAC is from the Real Estate sector.
5-Year PerformanceMAC has outperformed CLF, delivering a return of +12.8% compared to -14.0%
CLF vs MAC - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CLF vs MAC - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CLF vs MAC - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CLF | MAC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -10.66% | +35.20% |
| 2025 | +39.20% | -5.20% |
| 2024 | -52.45% | +33.42% |
| 2023 | +21.62% | +46.90% |
| 2022 | -25.86% | -32.38% |
| 2021 | +50.97% | +68.64% |
| 2020 | +88.69% | -55.04% |
| 2019 | +10.16% | -31.47% |
| 2018 | -2.66% | -31.52% |
| 2017 | -16.26% | -3.05% |
| 2016 | +403.59% | -7.54% |
| 2015 | -77.52% | +1.57% |
| 2014 | -71.27% | +48.48% |
| 2013 | -30.80% | +4.11% |
| 2012 | -38.56% | +18.93% |
| 2011 | -23.00% | +9.66% |
| 2010 | +63.25% | +43.61% |
| 2009 | +57.60% | +125.69% |
| 2008 | -46.54% | -72.27% |
| 2007 | +112.27% | -15.53% |
| 2006 | +5.86% | +30.43% |
| 2005 | +76.79% | +12.64% |
| 2004 | +95.85% | +51.46% |
| 2003 | +147.09% | +54.68% |
| 2002 | +7.53% | +24.65% |
| 2001 | -14.70% | +55.36% |
| 2000 | -24.00% | +4.10% |
| 1999 | +8.53% | +4.40% |
CLF vs MAC Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CLF was -98.78%, occurring on Jan 12, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for MAC was -93.28%, occurring on Mar 27, 2009. Recovery took 1566 trading sessions.
The current CLF drawdown is -87.57%. The current MAC drawdown is -52.90%.
| Rank | CLF | MAC |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.78% Jun 30, 2008 - Jan 12, 2016 | -93.28% Feb 7, 2007 - Apr 29, 2013 |
| #2 | -51.61% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002 | -92.92% Aug 1, 2016 - Apr 2, 2020 |
| #3 | -48.31% Apr 18, 2002 - Oct 13, 2003 | -26.80% Apr 1, 2004 - Aug 27, 2004 |
| #4 | -41.76% Mar 4, 2004 - Sep 2, 2004 | -23.77% Aug 1, 2000 - May 4, 2001 |
| #5 | -41.09% Feb 1, 2006 - Jan 30, 2007 | -22.33% Mar 16, 2015 - Jul 13, 2016 |
| #6 | -38.96% Mar 4, 2005 - Sep 28, 2005 | -21.21% May 20, 2013 - Jul 18, 2014 |
| #7 | -32.10% Jun 1, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 | -18.69% Jan 20, 2000 - May 1, 2000 |
| #8 | -27.95% Oct 12, 2007 - Dec 26, 2007 | -16.70% Dec 17, 2004 - May 20, 2005 |
| #9 | -21.75% Jan 5, 2004 - Feb 17, 2004 | -14.68% Aug 22, 2001 - Nov 15, 2001 |
| #10 | -20.24% Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 11, 2004 | -14.03% Jun 28, 2002 - Aug 26, 2002 |
| #11 | -18.57% Dec 28, 2007 - Feb 1, 2008 | -13.59% Aug 3, 2005 - Jan 5, 2006 |
| #12 | -17.14% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 1, 2008 | -12.53% Nov 3, 1999 - Dec 28, 1999 |
| #13 | -16.03% Sep 30, 2005 - Nov 9, 2005 | -11.31% Sep 26, 2002 - Dec 5, 2002 |
| #14 | -12.12% Jun 5, 2008 - Jun 23, 2008 | -10.58% Apr 12, 2002 - Jun 27, 2002 |
| #15 | -11.79% Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007 | -8.74% Mar 29, 2006 - Aug 30, 2006 |
Correlation
Correlation between CLF and MAC is 0.09 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CLF vs MAC dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CLF | MAC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.38% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 3.68% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 3.41% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 4.41% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 5.51% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 3.47% |
| 2020 | 0.82% | 10.78% |
| 2019 | 3.10% | 11.14% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 6.86% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 4.37% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 3.88% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 5.74% |
| 2014 | 8.40% | 3.01% |
| 2013 | 2.29% | 4.01% |
| 2012 | 5.59% | 3.83% |
| 2011 | 1.35% | 4.05% |
| 2010 | 0.65% | 4.43% |
| 2009 | 0.55% | 7.23% |
| 2008 | 1.37% | 17.62% |
| 2007 | 0.50% | 4.12% |
| 2006 | 0.98% | 3.18% |
| 2005 | 0.68% | 3.92% |
| 2004 | 0.19% | 3.95% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 5.21% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 7.22% |
| 2001 | 2.19% | 8.05% |
| 2000 | 6.96% | 10.73% |
| 1999 | 1.21% | 2.45% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks