StockComparison Logo
vs

CLF vs LAD

Comparison between Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF, Company) and Lithia Motors Inc - Class A (LAD, Company).

CLF is from the Basic Materials sector, while LAD is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceLAD has outperformed CLF, delivering a return of -5.1% compared to -12.0%

CLF vs LAD - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CLF
$6.26B
LAD
$6.23B
Max Drawdown
CLF
98.94%
Winner
LAD
95.71%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CLF
0.81
LAD
-0.51
5Y Beta
CLF
1.91
Winner
LAD
1.06
Industry
CLF
Steel
LAD
Auto & Truck Dealerships
P/E Ratio
Winner
CLF
-4.72
LAD
9.39
Forward P/E
CLF
29.67
Winner
LAD
8.33
PEG Ratio
Winner
CLF
0.43
LAD
0.65
Dividend Yield
CLF
N/A
LAD
0.81%
5Y Dividends CAGR
CLF
-6.01%
Winner
LAD
16.70%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
CLF
81.08%
LAD
4.50%
Debt to Equity
CLF
133.34%
Winner
LAD
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
CLF
-15.92%
Winner
LAD
-7.27%
P/S Ratio
CLF
0.33
Winner
LAD
0.17
P/B Ratio
CLF
1.08
Winner
LAD
1.05

CLF vs LAD - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CLF
+7.19%
LAD
-6.25%
3M
Winner
CLF
+1.00%
LAD
-12.85%
6M
Winner
CLF
-4.78%
LAD
-9.55%
1Y
Winner
CLF
+44.77%
LAD
-17.13%
5Y(CAGR)
CLF
-12.04%
Winner
LAD
-5.11%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CLF
+14.55%
LAD
+13.91%
Max(CAGR)
CLF
+5.43%
Winner
LAD
+11.62%

CLF vs LAD - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCLFLAD
2026-21.65%-19.97%
2025+39.20%-4.01%
2024-52.45%+10.83%
2023+21.62%+64.95%
2022-25.86%-30.82%
2021+50.97%+4.86%
2020+88.69%+100.29%
2019+10.16%+89.01%
2018-2.66%-32.82%
2017-16.26%+17.04%
2016+403.59%-4.96%
2015-77.52%+23.12%
2014-71.27%+27.61%
2013-30.80%+79.17%
2012-38.56%+71.54%
2011-23.00%+49.69%
2010+63.25%+80.14%
2009+57.60%+149.09%
2008-46.54%-74.04%
2007+112.27%-48.37%
2006+5.86%-6.17%
2005+76.79%+22.27%
2004+95.85%+8.42%
2003+147.09%+64.99%
2002+7.53%-23.46%
2001-14.70%+60.71%
2000-24.00%-29.68%
1999+8.53%-8.59%

CLF vs LAD Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CLF was -98.78%, occurring on Jan 12, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for LAD was -95.16%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 1626 trading sessions.

The current CLF drawdown is -89.10%. The current LAD drawdown is -33.77%.

RankCLFLAD
#1-98.78%
Jun 30, 2008 - Jan 12, 2016
-95.16%
Mar 27, 2006 - Sep 7, 2012
#2-51.61%
Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002
-64.23%
May 7, 2002 - Mar 8, 2004
#3-48.31%
Apr 18, 2002 - Oct 13, 2003
-61.15%
Nov 27, 2019 - Jul 10, 2020
#4-41.76%
Mar 4, 2004 - Sep 2, 2004
-55.47%
Mar 17, 2021 - Oct 20, 2022
#5-41.09%
Feb 1, 2006 - Jan 30, 2007
-44.79%
Dec 1, 2015 - Jan 12, 2018
#6-38.96%
Mar 4, 2005 - Sep 28, 2005
-44.69%
Jan 26, 2018 - Jul 24, 2019
#7-32.10%
Jun 1, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007
-42.47%
May 15, 2001 - Jan 4, 2002
#8-27.95%
Oct 12, 2007 - Dec 26, 2007
-41.82%
Nov 1, 1999 - May 9, 2001
#9-21.75%
Jan 5, 2004 - Feb 17, 2004
-33.46%
Jul 3, 2014 - Mar 19, 2015
#10-20.24%
Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 11, 2004
-32.35%
Mar 8, 2004 - Jul 26, 2005
#11-18.57%
Dec 28, 2007 - Feb 1, 2008
-26.32%
Oct 1, 2013 - Apr 29, 2014
#12-17.14%
Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 1, 2008
-20.19%
Aug 18, 2020 - Oct 5, 2020
#13-16.03%
Sep 30, 2005 - Nov 9, 2005
-19.62%
Aug 3, 2005 - Dec 14, 2005
#14-12.12%
Jun 5, 2008 - Jun 23, 2008
-19.11%
Oct 7, 2020 - Nov 23, 2020
#15-11.79%
Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007
-16.59%
Jan 4, 2002 - Mar 8, 2002

Correlation

Correlation between CLF and LAD is -0.18 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

-0.18
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CLF vs LAD dividend yield comparison.

YearCLFLAD
20260.00%0.42%
20250.00%0.66%
20240.00%0.58%
20230.00%0.58%
20220.00%0.79%
20210.00%0.46%
20200.82%0.42%
20193.10%0.81%
20180.00%1.49%
20170.00%0.93%
20160.00%0.98%
20150.00%0.71%
20148.40%0.70%
20132.29%0.56%
20125.59%1.26%
20111.35%1.19%
20100.65%1.05%
20090.55%0.00%
20081.37%14.42%
20070.50%4.08%
20060.98%1.81%
20050.68%1.27%
20040.19%1.12%
20030.00%0.56%
20012.19%0.00%
20006.96%0.00%
19991.21%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare