CLB vs TMQ

Comparison between Core Laboratories Inc (CLB, Company) and Trilogy Metals Inc (TMQ, Company).

CLB is from the Energy sector, while TMQ is from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceTMQ has outperformed CLB, delivering a return of +8.3% compared to -18.4%

CLB vs TMQ - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CLB(COMPANY)	TMQ(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$552M	$549M
Max Drawdown	96.31%	96.55%
Sharpe Ratio	0.30	0.81
5Y Beta	1.23	1.46
Industry	Oil & Gas Equipment & Services	Other Industrial Metals & Mining
P/E Ratio	19.08	-31.26
Forward P/E	19.76	N/A
PEG Ratio	3.79	-0.58
Dividend Yield	0.36%	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	0.00%	N/A
Debt to Equity	42.57%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	4.07%	-1.02%
P/B Ratio	N/A	4.44

Market Cap

Winner

CLB

$552M

TMQ

$549M

Max Drawdown

Winner

CLB

96.31%

TMQ

96.55%

Sharpe Ratio

CLB

0.30

Winner

TMQ

0.81

5Y Beta

Winner

CLB

1.23

TMQ

1.46

Industry

CLB

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

TMQ

Other Industrial Metals & Mining

P/E Ratio

CLB

19.08

Winner

TMQ

-31.26

Forward P/E

CLB

19.76

TMQ

N/A

PEG Ratio

CLB

3.79

Winner

TMQ

-0.58

Dividend Yield

CLB

0.36%

TMQ

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

CLB

0.00%

TMQ

N/A

Debt to Equity

CLB

42.57%

Winner

TMQ

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

CLB

4.07%

TMQ

-1.02%

P/B Ratio

CLB

N/A

TMQ

4.44

CLB vs TMQ - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CLB	TMQ
1 month	+1.46%	-11.38%
3 months	-30.68%	-24.70%
6 months	-39.23%	-49.19%
1 year	-6.15%	+57.75%
5 years(CAGR)	-18.45%	+8.28%
10 years(CAGR)	-19.78%	+18.07%
Max(CAGR)	+1.80%	-2.79%

Winner

CLB

+1.46%

TMQ

-11.38%

CLB

-30.68%

Winner

TMQ

-24.70%

Winner

CLB

-39.23%

TMQ

-49.19%

CLB

-6.15%

Winner

TMQ

+57.75%

5Y(CAGR)

CLB

-18.45%

Winner

TMQ

+8.28%

10Y(CAGR)

CLB

-19.78%

Winner

TMQ

+18.07%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

CLB

+1.80%

TMQ

-2.79%

CLB vs TMQ - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CLB	TMQ
2026	-30.23%	-31.26%
2025	-11.95%	+262.18%
2024	-0.80%	+171.28%
2023	-7.33%	-24.56%
2022	-16.88%	-67.65%
2021	-19.29%	-17.91%
2020	-30.42%	-23.37%
2019	-34.57%	+44.44%
2018	-45.70%	+46.61%
2017	-8.10%	+114.61%
2016	+14.09%	+83.67%
2015	-7.01%	-48.99%
2014	-35.33%	-67.97%
2013	+71.69%	-23.62%
2012	-4.52%	-61.65%
2011	+28.72%	N/A
2010	+47.40%	N/A
2009	+85.09%	N/A
2008	-51.75%	N/A
2007	+60.64%	N/A
2006	+109.84%	N/A
2005	+63.64%	N/A
2004	+38.66%	N/A
2003	+44.75%	N/A
2002	-21.72%	N/A
2001	-45.55%	N/A
2000	+41.87%	N/A
1999	+9.59%	N/A

CLB vs TMQ Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CLB was -95.78%, occurring on Mar 17, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for TMQ was -96.55%, occurring on Jan 20, 2016. Recovery took 3382 trading sessions.

The current CLB drawdown is -93.68%. The current TMQ drawdown is -70.24%.

Rank	CLB	TMQ
#1	-95.78% Apr 21, 2014 - Mar 17, 2020	-96.55% Apr 25, 2012 - Oct 7, 2025
#2	-74.19% Apr 3, 2000 - Jul 29, 2005	-71.98% Oct 14, 2025 - Jul 16, 2026
#3	-65.25% Nov 6, 2007 - Apr 22, 2010	-9.47% Oct 9, 2025 - Oct 13, 2025
#4	-31.21% May 2, 2012 - Apr 22, 2013	-2.92% Oct 7, 2025 - Oct 9, 2025
#5	-29.26% May 5, 2006 - Jul 27, 2006	N/A
#6	-27.02% Sep 5, 2006 - Nov 14, 2006	N/A
#7	-26.37% Jul 15, 2011 - Dec 1, 2011	N/A
#8	-20.07% Dec 8, 2006 - Apr 25, 2007	N/A
#9	-18.95% Nov 19, 1999 - Mar 1, 2000	N/A
#10	-15.49% Sep 7, 2005 - Nov 1, 2005	N/A
#11	-15.11% Apr 26, 2010 - Jun 18, 2010	N/A
#12	-14.26% Mar 7, 2000 - Mar 31, 2000	N/A
#13	-13.63% Oct 18, 2010 - Dec 7, 2010	N/A
#14	-13.09% Apr 4, 2011 - Jun 20, 2011	N/A
#15	-11.32% Aug 10, 2007 - Sep 5, 2007	N/A