StockComparison Logo
vs

CL vs HLT

Comparison between Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL, Company) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc (HLT, Company).

CL is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while HLT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceHLT has outperformed CL, delivering a return of +22.0% compared to +3.9%

CL vs HLT - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
CL
$72B
Winner
HLT
$74B
Max Drawdown
Winner
CL
34.23%
HLT
50.90%
Sharpe Ratio
CL
-0.03
Winner
HLT
1.02
5Y Beta
Winner
CL
0.05
HLT
0.93
Industry
CL
Household & Personal Products
HLT
Lodging
P/E Ratio
Winner
CL
25.95
HLT
48.77
Forward P/E
Winner
CL
23.36
HLT
36.10
PEG Ratio
CL
801.96
Winner
HLT
16.29
Dividend Yield
Winner
CL
2.31%
HLT
0.19%
5Y Dividends CAGR
CL
3.38%
Winner
HLT
31.95%
5Y EPS CAGR
CL
5.50%
HLT
N/A
Debt to Equity
CL
5473.79%
Winner
HLT
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CL
5.99%
HLT
2.98%
P/S Ratio
Winner
CL
3.48
HLT
14.54
P/B Ratio
CL
496.78
Winner
HLT
277.41

CL vs HLT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CL
+10.54%
HLT
-5.13%
3M
CL
-4.29%
Winner
HLT
+2.20%
6M
CL
+13.14%
Winner
HLT
+17.65%
1Y
CL
+1.15%
Winner
HLT
+31.09%
5Y(CAGR)
CL
+3.86%
Winner
HLT
+22.00%
10Y(CAGR)
CL
+5.03%
Winner
HLT
+22.77%
Max(CAGR)
CL
+6.39%
Winner
HLT
+17.62%

CL vs HLT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCLHLT
2026+17.86%+10.22%
2025-10.65%+17.46%
2024+15.10%+37.64%
2023+3.31%+46.22%
2022-4.60%-17.93%
2021+3.50%+45.16%
2020+28.50%-0.01%
2019+19.15%+57.36%
2018-18.85%-9.19%
2017+17.71%+39.53%
2016+3.40%+30.59%
2015-1.35%-17.03%
2014+9.94%+19.35%
2013+25.47%+3.49%
2012+17.62%N/A
2011+18.91%N/A
2010-0.53%N/A
2009+21.54%N/A
2008-9.37%N/A
2007+21.12%N/A
2006+21.38%N/A
2005+12.05%N/A
2004+5.04%N/A
2003-5.45%N/A
2002-7.80%N/A
2001-6.47%N/A
2000+4.85%N/A
1999+5.16%N/A

CL vs HLT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CL was -34.06%, occurring on Mar 10, 2000. Recovery took 250 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for HLT was -50.82%, occurring on Apr 3, 2020. Recovery took 246 trading sessions.

The current CL drawdown is -13.38%. The current HLT drawdown is -5.87%.

RankCLHLT
#1-34.06%
Dec 31, 1999 - Dec 27, 2000
-50.82%
Jan 17, 2020 - Jan 8, 2021
#2-31.06%
Sep 12, 2008 - Oct 6, 2009
-44.44%
Apr 9, 2015 - May 22, 2017
#3-30.00%
Dec 27, 2000 - Apr 26, 2006
-32.65%
Apr 19, 2022 - Nov 13, 2023
#4-29.07%
Sep 4, 2024 - Nov 3, 2025
-26.81%
Jan 26, 2018 - Apr 4, 2019
#5-23.76%
Jan 22, 2018 - Jul 29, 2019
-26.35%
Feb 12, 2025 - Jul 3, 2025
#6-22.57%
Feb 10, 2020 - Jul 30, 2020
-18.30%
Feb 15, 2022 - Apr 19, 2022
#7-18.36%
Dec 31, 2021 - Jan 23, 2024
-16.11%
Aug 27, 2014 - Nov 14, 2014
#8-14.92%
Jan 9, 2008 - Sep 12, 2008
-14.41%
Nov 5, 2021 - Dec 22, 2021
#9-14.57%
Mar 5, 2015 - Mar 17, 2016
-13.57%
Jan 8, 2021 - Feb 19, 2021
#10-13.66%
Sep 6, 2016 - Feb 23, 2017
-12.01%
Dec 31, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022
#11-13.22%
Dec 1, 2020 - Dec 28, 2021
-11.56%
Jul 16, 2024 - Sep 24, 2024
#12-12.99%
Dec 2, 2009 - Apr 29, 2011
-11.52%
Jul 29, 2021 - Sep 24, 2021
#13-12.89%
Jul 29, 2019 - Feb 3, 2020
-10.29%
Feb 11, 2026 - Apr 13, 2026
#14-11.92%
Nov 1, 1999 - Dec 22, 1999
-10.26%
Apr 29, 2021 - Jul 29, 2021
#15-10.44%
May 16, 2013 - Oct 16, 2013
-9.79%
Jul 11, 2019 - Nov 22, 2019

Correlation

Correlation between CL and HLT is 0.91 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.91
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CL vs HLT dividend yield comparison.

YearCLHLT
20261.16%0.05%
20252.61%0.21%
20242.18%0.24%
20232.40%0.33%
20222.36%0.36%
20212.10%0.00%
20202.05%0.13%
20192.48%0.54%
20182.79%0.84%
20172.11%31.40%
20162.37%1.03%
20152.25%0.65%
20142.05%0.00%
20132.04%0.00%
20122.33%0.00%
20112.46%0.00%
20102.53%0.00%
20092.09%0.00%
20082.28%0.00%
20071.80%0.00%
20061.92%0.00%
20052.02%0.00%
20041.88%0.00%
20031.80%0.00%
20021.37%0.00%
20011.17%0.00%
20000.98%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare