CIM vs NAT
Comparison between Chimera Investment Corp (CIM, Company) and Nordic American Tankers Ltd (NAT, Company).
CIM is from the Real Estate sector, while NAT is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceNAT has outperformed CIM, delivering a return of +19.7% compared to -12.2%
CIM vs NAT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CIM vs NAT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CIM vs NAT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CIM | NAT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +8.75% | +73.61% |
| 2025 | -1.22% | +51.60% |
| 2024 | +4.12% | -35.05% |
| 2023 | -3.52% | +59.77% |
| 2022 | -58.45% | +63.72% |
| 2021 | +67.44% | -44.13% |
| 2020 | -42.79% | -31.79% |
| 2019 | +27.27% | +143.11% |
| 2018 | +9.19% | -17.26% |
| 2017 | +16.23% | -68.99% |
| 2016 | +45.53% | -38.05% |
| 2015 | +6.87% | +68.79% |
| 2014 | +20.47% | +12.57% |
| 2013 | +30.25% | +20.53% |
| 2012 | +15.98% | -23.57% |
| 2011 | -29.07% | -51.49% |
| 2010 | +25.49% | -9.92% |
| 2009 | +29.50% | -5.73% |
| 2008 | -79.09% | +19.19% |
| 2007 | +20.18% | +7.46% |
| 2006 | N/A | +36.29% |
| 2005 | N/A | -14.78% |
| 2004 | N/A | +206.57% |
| 2003 | N/A | +35.17% |
| 2002 | N/A | +5.80% |
| 2001 | N/A | -15.78% |
| 2000 | N/A | +117.56% |
| 1999 | N/A | -1.21% |
CIM vs NAT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CIM was -89.72%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 2937 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NAT was -90.14%, occurring on Feb 3, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CIM drawdown is -58.99%. The current NAT drawdown is -39.69%.
| Rank | CIM | NAT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -89.72% Jan 22, 2008 - Sep 20, 2019 | -90.14% May 8, 2009 - Feb 3, 2022 |
| #2 | -72.11% Feb 20, 2020 - Jun 11, 2024 | -45.37% Feb 28, 2005 - Jul 3, 2007 |
| #3 | -5.37% Nov 16, 2007 - Nov 30, 2007 | -45.06% Jun 5, 2001 - May 23, 2003 |
| #4 | -4.47% Dec 31, 2007 - Jan 16, 2008 | -37.72% Jul 11, 2007 - May 19, 2008 |
| #5 | -3.19% Dec 24, 2007 - Dec 31, 2007 | -37.46% Jul 23, 2008 - May 4, 2009 |
| #6 | -2.54% Sep 25, 2019 - Oct 10, 2019 | -30.38% Jul 9, 2004 - Oct 5, 2004 |
| #7 | -2.35% Oct 29, 2019 - Dec 6, 2019 | -22.93% May 27, 2003 - Jan 5, 2004 |
| #8 | -2.26% Nov 30, 2007 - Dec 18, 2007 | -19.23% Oct 10, 2000 - Mar 8, 2001 |
| #9 | -1.46% Dec 27, 2019 - Jan 7, 2020 | -17.92% Apr 27, 2004 - May 26, 2004 |
| #10 | -1.13% Jan 21, 2020 - Jan 29, 2020 | -14.92% Jan 23, 2004 - Feb 26, 2004 |
| #11 | -1.03% Oct 23, 2019 - Oct 29, 2019 | -14.87% Mar 30, 2004 - Apr 19, 2004 |
| #12 | -1.03% Jan 29, 2020 - Feb 12, 2020 | -13.05% May 20, 2008 - Jul 23, 2008 |
| #13 | -0.39% Dec 13, 2019 - Dec 17, 2019 | -12.90% Jun 16, 2004 - Jul 2, 2004 |
| #14 | -0.38% Jan 7, 2020 - Jan 10, 2020 | -12.45% Nov 5, 2004 - Jan 14, 2005 |
| #15 | -0.38% Jan 16, 2020 - Jan 21, 2020 | -12.40% Oct 6, 2004 - Oct 18, 2004 |
Correlation
Correlation between CIM and NAT is -0.56 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CIM vs NAT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CIM | NAT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.36% | 7.17% |
| 2025 | 11.91% | 10.47% |
| 2024 | 10.14% | 16.00% |
| 2023 | 14.03% | 11.67% |
| 2022 | 20.36% | 3.59% |
| 2021 | 8.55% | 3.55% |
| 2020 | 13.66% | 15.25% |
| 2019 | 9.73% | 2.03% |
| 2018 | 11.22% | 8.00% |
| 2017 | 8.12% | 21.54% |
| 2016 | 14.34% | 16.31% |
| 2015 | 28.15% | 8.88% |
| 2014 | 17.61% | 6.16% |
| 2013 | 11.61% | 8.25% |
| 2012 | 14.56% | 13.71% |
| 2011 | 20.32% | 9.59% |
| 2010 | 16.79% | 6.53% |
| 2009 | 11.08% | 7.83% |
| 2008 | 17.97% | 17.45% |
| 2007 | 0.14% | 11.61% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 17.13% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 14.62% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 12.39% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 20.27% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 9.97% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 27.94% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 12.80% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks