CIK vs GGT
Comparison between Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund Inc (CIK, ETF) and Gabelli Multimedia Trust Inc (GGT, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceCIK has outperformed GGT, delivering a return of +2.6% compared to -2.5%
CIK vs GGT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CIK vs GGT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CIK vs GGT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CIK | GGT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -8.60% | +12.12% |
| 2025 | +7.14% | +14.58% |
| 2024 | +5.40% | -2.58% |
| 2023 | +35.36% | +20.63% |
| 2022 | -20.82% | -33.05% |
| 2021 | +19.34% | +21.97% |
| 2020 | +6.85% | +13.07% |
| 2019 | +25.89% | +26.38% |
| 2018 | -8.39% | -15.26% |
| 2017 | +13.04% | +39.84% |
| 2016 | +23.48% | +8.78% |
| 2015 | -7.33% | -15.82% |
| 2014 | -0.10% | -7.27% |
| 2013 | -6.22% | +68.66% |
| 2012 | +19.19% | +36.68% |
| 2011 | +12.25% | -15.10% |
| 2010 | +15.26% | +34.27% |
| 2009 | +58.36% | +39.45% |
| 2008 | -24.93% | -61.95% |
| 2007 | -10.40% | +10.15% |
| 2006 | +27.13% | +28.06% |
| 2005 | -9.37% | +0.08% |
| 2004 | +7.88% | +17.11% |
| 2003 | +26.34% | +36.60% |
| 2002 | -14.24% | -30.06% |
| 2001 | +0.33% | -12.61% |
| 2000 | -3.89% | -37.99% |
| 1999 | -3.96% | +14.05% |
CIK vs GGT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CIK was -54.28%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 656 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for GGT was -80.99%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 3374 trading sessions.
The current CIK drawdown is -12.40%. The current GGT drawdown is -17.58%.
| Rank | CIK | GGT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -54.28% May 16, 2007 - Dec 21, 2009 | -80.99% Dec 10, 1999 - May 13, 2013 |
| #2 | -39.09% Feb 18, 2020 - Dec 16, 2020 | -57.31% Feb 21, 2020 - Nov 23, 2020 |
| #3 | -36.18% Jan 15, 2002 - May 31, 2005 | -49.91% Jul 2, 2021 - Nov 9, 2023 |
| #4 | -26.94% Jan 29, 2001 - Jan 15, 2002 | -38.59% Dec 27, 2013 - May 25, 2017 |
| #5 | -26.22% Jan 3, 2022 - Jun 26, 2023 | -23.78% Jun 14, 2018 - Sep 12, 2019 |
| #6 | -24.22% May 3, 2013 - Dec 12, 2016 | -12.73% Oct 5, 2017 - Jan 22, 2018 |
| #7 | -21.26% Jul 13, 2005 - Sep 28, 2006 | -12.13% May 23, 2013 - Jul 5, 2013 |
| #8 | -20.19% Aug 18, 2000 - Jan 26, 2001 | -7.91% Jun 14, 2021 - Jun 24, 2021 |
| #9 | -17.34% May 27, 2011 - Jan 27, 2012 | -7.89% Jan 29, 2018 - Mar 7, 2018 |
| #10 | -15.65% Jul 25, 2023 - Dec 8, 2023 | -7.78% Aug 1, 2013 - Sep 18, 2013 |
| #11 | -15.49% Oct 7, 2025 - Mar 30, 2026 | -7.35% Mar 21, 2018 - Jun 14, 2018 |
| #12 | -15.16% Oct 3, 2018 - Mar 20, 2019 | -6.81% Mar 22, 2021 - Apr 13, 2021 |
| #13 | -14.29% May 3, 2010 - Jul 29, 2010 | -6.73% Apr 15, 2021 - Jun 1, 2021 |
| #14 | -12.39% Feb 2, 2000 - Jul 17, 2000 | -6.69% Sep 13, 2019 - Feb 19, 2020 |
| #15 | -11.87% Nov 2, 2012 - Jan 2, 2013 | -6.40% Aug 1, 2017 - Sep 21, 2017 |
Correlation
Correlation between CIK and GGT is 0.93 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CIK vs GGT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CIK | GGT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.20% | 8.33% |
| 2025 | 9.54% | 20.95% |
| 2024 | 9.34% | 19.58% |
| 2023 | 8.63% | 15.52% |
| 2022 | 10.71% | 16.45% |
| 2021 | 7.87% | 10.14% |
| 2020 | 8.57% | 11.05% |
| 2019 | 8.39% | 10.97% |
| 2018 | 9.64% | 12.75% |
| 2017 | 7.98% | 9.56% |
| 2016 | 8.35% | 11.46% |
| 2015 | 9.50% | 12.53% |
| 2014 | 8.39% | 10.49% |
| 2013 | 8.34% | 7.41% |
| 2012 | 7.89% | 10.19% |
| 2011 | 7.99% | 13.96% |
| 2010 | 9.82% | 7.31% |
| 2009 | 9.40% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 18.80% | 12.81% |
| 2007 | 9.22% | 5.82% |
| 2006 | 9.13% | 5.14% |
| 2005 | 10.76% | 5.91% |
| 2004 | 9.44% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 10.00% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 18.04% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 14.46% | 0.67% |
| 2000 | 5.45% | 14.55% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks