CIK vs CHGX
Comparison between Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund Inc (CIK, ETF) and STANCE SUSTAINABLE BETA ETF (CHGX, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceCHGX has outperformed CIK, delivering a return of +10.4% compared to +1.9%
CIK vs CHGX - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CIK vs CHGX - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CIK vs CHGX - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CIK | CHGX |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -10.06% | +18.36% |
| 2025 | +7.14% | +12.25% |
| 2024 | +5.40% | +16.10% |
| 2023 | +35.36% | +23.60% |
| 2022 | -20.82% | -21.70% |
| 2021 | +19.34% | +24.27% |
| 2020 | +6.85% | +23.84% |
| 2019 | +25.89% | +32.61% |
| 2018 | -8.39% | -6.59% |
| 2017 | +13.04% | +4.32% |
| 2016 | +23.48% | N/A |
| 2015 | -7.33% | N/A |
| 2014 | -0.10% | N/A |
| 2013 | -6.22% | N/A |
| 2012 | +19.19% | N/A |
| 2011 | +12.25% | N/A |
| 2010 | +15.26% | N/A |
| 2009 | +58.36% | N/A |
| 2008 | -24.93% | N/A |
| 2007 | -10.40% | N/A |
| 2006 | +27.13% | N/A |
| 2005 | -9.37% | N/A |
| 2004 | +7.88% | N/A |
| 2003 | +26.34% | N/A |
| 2002 | -14.24% | N/A |
| 2001 | +0.33% | N/A |
| 2000 | -3.89% | N/A |
| 1999 | -3.96% | N/A |
CIK vs CHGX Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CIK was -54.28%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 656 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CHGX was -35.49%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 116 trading sessions.
The current CIK drawdown is -13.81%. The current CHGX drawdown is -3.56%.
| Rank | CIK | CHGX |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -54.28% May 16, 2007 - Dec 21, 2009 | -35.49% Feb 19, 2020 - Aug 4, 2020 |
| #2 | -39.09% Feb 18, 2020 - Dec 16, 2020 | -30.26% Nov 16, 2021 - Feb 2, 2024 |
| #3 | -36.18% Jan 15, 2002 - May 31, 2005 | -18.63% Sep 21, 2018 - Apr 1, 2019 |
| #4 | -26.94% Jan 29, 2001 - Jan 15, 2002 | -18.09% Dec 4, 2024 - Jun 27, 2025 |
| #5 | -26.22% Jan 3, 2022 - Jun 26, 2023 | -10.31% Jan 29, 2018 - Aug 28, 2018 |
| #6 | -24.22% May 3, 2013 - Dec 12, 2016 | -8.50% Feb 27, 2026 - Apr 14, 2026 |
| #7 | -21.26% Jul 13, 2005 - Sep 28, 2006 | -8.13% Sep 2, 2020 - Oct 12, 2020 |
| #8 | -20.19% Aug 18, 2000 - Jan 26, 2001 | -7.70% Oct 12, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020 |
| #9 | -17.34% May 27, 2011 - Jan 27, 2012 | -7.50% Oct 27, 2025 - Jan 6, 2026 |
| #10 | -15.65% Jul 25, 2023 - Dec 8, 2023 | -7.39% Jul 16, 2024 - Aug 21, 2024 |
| #11 | -15.49% Oct 7, 2025 - Mar 30, 2026 | -7.18% Mar 28, 2024 - Jul 12, 2024 |
| #12 | -15.16% Oct 3, 2018 - Mar 20, 2019 | -7.04% May 6, 2019 - Jun 20, 2019 |
| #13 | -14.29% May 3, 2010 - Jul 29, 2010 | -7.01% Sep 3, 2021 - Nov 3, 2021 |
| #14 | -12.39% Feb 2, 2000 - Jul 17, 2000 | -7.00% Jul 26, 2019 - Nov 15, 2019 |
| #15 | -11.87% Nov 2, 2012 - Jan 2, 2013 | -5.92% Feb 12, 2021 - Apr 1, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between CIK and CHGX is 0.95 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CIK vs CHGX dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CIK | CHGX |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.27% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 9.54% | 0.67% |
| 2024 | 9.34% | 0.76% |
| 2023 | 8.63% | 0.94% |
| 2022 | 10.71% | 1.11% |
| 2021 | 7.87% | 0.56% |
| 2020 | 8.57% | 0.58% |
| 2019 | 8.39% | 0.86% |
| 2018 | 9.64% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 7.98% | 0.59% |
| 2016 | 8.35% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 9.50% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 8.39% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 8.34% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 7.89% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 7.99% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 9.82% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 9.40% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 18.80% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 9.22% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 9.13% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 10.76% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 9.44% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 10.00% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 18.04% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 14.46% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 5.45% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks