StockComparison Logo
vs

CII vs AWF

Comparison between BlackRock Enhanced Capital and Income Fund Inc (CII, ETF) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund Inc (AWF, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceCII has outperformed AWF, delivering a return of +13.8% compared to +4.0%

CII vs AWF - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Net Assets
CII
$979M
Winner
AWF
$980M
Max Drawdown
CII
64.83%
Winner
AWF
58.11%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CII
2.06
AWF
-0.31
5Y Beta
CII
0.86
Winner
AWF
0.36
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
CII
30.87%
AWF
0.00%

CII vs AWF - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CII
+0.78%
AWF
-1.06%
3M
Winner
CII
+11.11%
AWF
+0.07%
6M
Winner
CII
+10.31%
AWF
-2.23%
1Y
Winner
CII
+40.64%
AWF
+0.55%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CII
+13.83%
AWF
+4.02%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CII
+14.84%
AWF
+5.57%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CII
+10.63%
AWF
+9.91%

CII vs AWF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCIIAWF
2026+7.76%-2.31%
2025+37.75%+7.09%
2024+13.30%+13.51%
2023+18.68%+16.57%
2022-12.97%-16.82%
2021+35.81%+9.58%
2020+8.26%+4.70%
2019+29.18%+20.19%
2018-8.71%-11.22%
2017+28.01%+6.58%
2016+7.46%+23.68%
2015+8.16%-4.85%
2014+12.15%-3.55%
2013+17.58%-0.91%
2012+9.74%+18.15%
2011-8.53%+10.23%
2010+7.34%+16.72%
2009+55.66%+87.04%
2008-35.48%-30.41%
2007+11.60%+5.03%
2006+26.22%+20.10%
2005+0.65%+8.30%
2004-5.18%+3.32%
2003N/A+45.46%
2002N/A+12.40%
2001N/A+26.10%
2000N/A+6.73%
1999N/A-6.33%

CII vs AWF Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CII was -56.39%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 611 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for AWF was -55.54%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 293 trading sessions.

The current CII drawdown is -6.60%. The current AWF drawdown is -6.48%.

RankCIIAWF
#1-56.39%
Jul 13, 2007 - Dec 14, 2009
-55.54%
Jun 4, 2008 - Aug 3, 2009
#2-40.60%
Feb 19, 2020 - Nov 17, 2020
-40.12%
Feb 20, 2020 - Dec 30, 2020
#3-26.02%
May 31, 2011 - Oct 8, 2012
-25.23%
Nov 12, 2021 - Mar 1, 2024
#4-22.31%
Dec 30, 2021 - Jul 19, 2023
-24.59%
Jan 23, 2004 - Jan 3, 2005
#5-21.96%
Sep 21, 2018 - Oct 17, 2019
-21.15%
May 16, 2013 - Jun 8, 2016
#6-21.06%
Feb 18, 2025 - Jun 9, 2025
-18.61%
May 31, 2002 - Dec 30, 2002
#7-20.20%
May 20, 2015 - Sep 6, 2016
-18.10%
Jun 4, 2007 - Jan 11, 2008
#8-18.00%
May 26, 2004 - Feb 16, 2006
-17.55%
Jun 29, 2001 - Jan 8, 2002
#9-14.23%
Apr 29, 2010 - Oct 26, 2010
-16.68%
Apr 26, 2010 - Jul 29, 2010
#10-12.82%
Dec 14, 2009 - Mar 18, 2010
-15.69%
Jul 8, 2011 - Dec 22, 2011
#11-12.00%
Sep 6, 2023 - Dec 29, 2023
-15.48%
Oct 20, 2017 - Apr 11, 2019
#12-11.65%
Jan 13, 2026 - Apr 14, 2026
-13.63%
Jul 17, 2000 - Jan 17, 2001
#13-10.98%
Sep 5, 2014 - Nov 25, 2014
-13.05%
Jun 17, 2003 - Sep 30, 2003
#14-10.47%
Oct 8, 2012 - Jan 18, 2013
-11.49%
Nov 8, 2010 - Apr 1, 2011
#15-9.28%
Jan 26, 2018 - Jul 10, 2018
-11.11%
Feb 26, 2025 - Jun 18, 2025

Correlation

Correlation between CII and AWF is 0.92 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.92
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CII vs AWF dividend yield comparison.

YearCIIAWF
20262.90%3.41%
202516.65%7.81%
20246.15%7.47%
20236.28%7.33%
202212.27%10.30%
20214.98%6.48%
20206.03%6.68%
20195.79%6.62%
20187.06%7.97%
20176.07%6.03%
20168.38%7.73%
20158.49%10.28%
20148.59%11.91%
20138.78%11.09%
201210.63%9.21%
201112.72%11.45%
201013.06%8.39%
200912.46%8.41%
200817.34%18.70%
200712.17%13.20%
20067.15%8.09%
20056.97%7.57%
20043.28%7.52%
20030.00%8.08%
20020.00%12.22%
20010.00%14.01%
20000.00%5.12%

Select Stocks to Compare