CIG-C vs MSGS

Comparison between Cia Energetica DE Minas Gerais - Cemig (CIG-C, Company) and Madison Square Garden Sports Corp - Class A (MSGS, Company).

CIG-C is from the Utilities sector, while MSGS is from the Communication Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceMSGS has outperformed CIG-C, delivering a return of +18.4% compared to +12.4%

CIG-C vs MSGS - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CIG-C(COMPANY)	MSGS(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$8.84B	$8.85B
Max Drawdown	84.66%	41.57%
Sharpe Ratio	0.76	2.21
5Y Beta	0.32	0.66
Industry	Utilities - Regulated Electric	Entertainment
P/E Ratio	9.73	-254.05
Forward P/E	13.46	72.46
PEG Ratio	0.33	N/A
Dividend Yield	40.80%	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	14.18%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	3.49%	N/A
Debt to Equity	69.27%	-87.49%
Free Cash Flow Yield	6.77%	0.60%
P/S Ratio	0.20	8.17
P/B Ratio	1.60	1.57

Market Cap

CIG-C

$8.84B

Winner

MSGS

$8.85B

Max Drawdown

CIG-C

84.66%

Winner

MSGS

41.57%

Sharpe Ratio

CIG-C

0.76

Winner

MSGS

2.21

5Y Beta

Winner

CIG-C

0.32

MSGS

0.66

Industry

CIG-C

Utilities - Regulated Electric

MSGS

Entertainment

P/E Ratio

CIG-C

9.73

Winner

MSGS

-254.05

Forward P/E

Winner

CIG-C

13.46

MSGS

72.46

PEG Ratio

CIG-C

0.33

MSGS

N/A

Dividend Yield

CIG-C

40.80%

MSGS

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

CIG-C

14.18%

MSGS

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

CIG-C

3.49%

MSGS

N/A

Debt to Equity

CIG-C

69.27%

Winner

MSGS

-87.49%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

CIG-C

6.77%

MSGS

0.60%

P/S Ratio

Winner

CIG-C

0.20

MSGS

8.17

P/B Ratio

CIG-C

1.60

Winner

MSGS

1.57

CIG-C vs MSGS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CIG-C	MSGS
1 month	-4.79%	+7.27%
3 months	+3.49%	+24.78%
6 months	+22.63%	+51.09%
1 year	+25.91%	+90.10%
5 years(CAGR)	+12.35%	+18.44%
10 years(CAGR)	+13.99%	+16.83%
Max(CAGR)	+0.38%	+16.10%

CIG-C

-4.79%

Winner

MSGS

+7.27%

CIG-C

+3.49%

Winner

MSGS

+24.78%

CIG-C

+22.63%

Winner

MSGS

+51.09%

CIG-C

+25.91%

Winner

MSGS

+90.10%

5Y(CAGR)

CIG-C

+12.35%

Winner

MSGS

+18.44%

10Y(CAGR)

CIG-C

+13.99%

Winner

MSGS

+16.83%

Max(CAGR)

CIG-C

+0.38%

Winner

MSGS

+16.10%

CIG-C vs MSGS - Annual Returns (2014 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CIG-C	MSGS
2026	+20.35%	+51.81%
2025	+23.67%	+15.94%
2024	+3.47%	+24.80%
2023	+8.62%	+0.31%
2022	-1.59%	+8.37%
2021	+19.91%	-3.03%
2020	-12.47%	+19.29%
2019	+2.19%	+10.76%
2018	+113.35%	+27.82%
2017	-24.76%	+20.73%
2016	+71.78%	+11.33%
2015	-66.34%	+1.45%
2014	-19.31%	N/A

CIG-C vs MSGS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CIG-C was -84.44%, occurring on Jan 21, 2016. Recovery took 2883 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for MSGS was -41.57%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 449 trading sessions.

The current CIG-C drawdown is -21.14%. The current MSGS drawdown is -0.18%.

Rank	CIG-C	MSGS
#1	-84.44% Oct 8, 2014 - Mar 27, 2026	-41.57% Jul 6, 2018 - Apr 20, 2020
#2	-24.94% Apr 14, 2026 - Jun 1, 2026	-33.28% Mar 1, 2021 - Apr 11, 2023
#3	-10.86% Sep 22, 2014 - Oct 7, 2014	-25.54% Dec 16, 2024 - Dec 12, 2025
#4	-1.04% Mar 27, 2026 - Mar 31, 2026	-22.82% Oct 15, 2015 - Jul 22, 2016
#5	-0.91% Mar 31, 2026 - Apr 2, 2026	-22.36% Apr 20, 2020 - Dec 28, 2020
#6	-0.60% Apr 6, 2026 - Apr 8, 2026	-22.36% Jul 31, 2023 - Oct 3, 2024
#7	N/A	-15.83% May 4, 2023 - Jul 28, 2023
#8	N/A	-14.19% Aug 18, 2016 - Mar 3, 2017
#9	N/A	-13.16% Jan 6, 2021 - Feb 19, 2021
#10	N/A	-10.08% Feb 18, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026
#11	N/A	-9.49% Nov 9, 2017 - Feb 20, 2018
#12	N/A	-8.10% Jun 11, 2026 - Jun 17, 2026
#13	N/A	-7.36% Sep 6, 2017 - Nov 3, 2017
#14	N/A	-6.56% Apr 6, 2017 - Jul 19, 2017
#15	N/A	-5.72% Jun 20, 2018 - Jun 28, 2018

Correlation

Correlation between CIG-C and MSGS is 0.78 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.78

-101

Dividend Comparison (2016 - 2026)

CIG-C vs MSGS dividend yield comparison.

Year	CIG-C	MSGS
2026	4.40%	0.00%
2025	9.26%	0.00%
2024	7.82%	0.00%
2023	3.72%	0.00%
2022	7.83%	3.82%
2021	6.79%	0.00%
2020	3.37%	36.97%
2019	2.87%	0.00%
2018	0.23%	0.00%
2017	1.41%	0.00%
2016	6.86%	0.00%