StockComparison Logo
vs

CIG-C vs GGB

Comparison between Cia Energetica DE Minas Gerais - Cemig (CIG-C, Company) and Gerdau S.A. (GGB, Company).

CIG-C is from the Utilities sector, while GGB is from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceCIG-C has outperformed GGB, delivering a return of +13.3% compared to +6.6%

CIG-C vs GGB - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CIG-C
$9.33B
GGB
$9.30B
Max Drawdown
Winner
CIG-C
84.66%
GGB
96.89%
Sharpe Ratio
CIG-C
0.84
Winner
GGB
1.76
5Y Beta
Winner
CIG-C
0.29
GGB
1.07
Industry
CIG-C
Utilities - Regulated Electric
GGB
Steel
P/E Ratio
Winner
CIG-C
12.35
GGB
30.11
Forward P/E
CIG-C
13.46
Winner
GGB
6.92
PEG Ratio
Winner
CIG-C
0.33
GGB
90.95
Dividend Yield
Winner
CIG-C
38.30%
GGB
3.04%
5Y Dividends CAGR
CIG-C
14.18%
Winner
GGB
15.47%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
CIG-C
-0.26%
GGB
-19.76%
Debt to Equity
CIG-C
69.27%
Winner
GGB
29.13%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CIG-C
6.42%
GGB
4.85%
P/S Ratio
CIG-C
0.21
Winner
GGB
0.13
P/B Ratio
CIG-C
1.61
Winner
GGB
0.86

CIG-C vs GGB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CIG-C
-1.91%
Winner
GGB
+10.00%
3M
CIG-C
+7.30%
Winner
GGB
+18.29%
6M
Winner
CIG-C
+33.83%
GGB
+33.12%
1Y
CIG-C
+21.16%
Winner
GGB
+71.92%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CIG-C
+13.32%
GGB
+6.60%
10Y(CAGR)
CIG-C
+14.94%
Winner
GGB
+19.53%
Max(CAGR)
CIG-C
+0.80%
Winner
GGB
+12.48%

CIG-C vs GGB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCIG-CGGB
2026+26.40%+26.43%
2025+23.67%+32.73%
2024+3.47%-25.00%
2023+8.62%+0.11%
2022-1.59%+30.84%
2021+19.91%+11.60%
2020-12.47%-6.93%
2019+2.19%+25.39%
2018+113.35%-3.15%
2017-24.76%+10.80%
2016+71.78%+174.03%
2015-66.34%-64.12%
2014-19.31%-52.40%
2013N/A-15.68%
2012N/A+10.33%
2011N/A-43.82%
2010N/A-18.86%
2009N/A+144.27%
2008N/A-51.44%
2007N/A+84.62%
2006N/A+42.74%
2005N/A+54.17%
2004N/A+77.91%
2003N/A+195.29%
2002N/A-1.21%
2001N/A+21.40%
2000N/A-32.67%
1999N/A+50.87%

CIG-C vs GGB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CIG-C was -84.44%, occurring on Jan 21, 2016. Recovery took 2883 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for GGB was -96.38%, occurring on Jan 21, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current CIG-C drawdown is -17.18%. The current GGB drawdown is -57.53%.

RankCIG-CGGB
#1-84.44%
Oct 8, 2014 - Mar 27, 2026
-96.38%
Jun 19, 2008 - Jan 21, 2016
#2-18.62%
Apr 14, 2026 - May 13, 2026
-67.27%
Jan 19, 2000 - Apr 17, 2002
#3-10.86%
Sep 22, 2014 - Oct 7, 2014
-49.73%
Apr 17, 2002 - May 2, 2003
#4-1.04%
Mar 27, 2026 - Mar 31, 2026
-35.02%
Apr 6, 2004 - Jul 2, 2004
#5-0.91%
Mar 31, 2026 - Apr 2, 2026
-33.36%
Mar 7, 2005 - Sep 6, 2005
#6-0.60%
Apr 6, 2026 - Apr 8, 2026
-31.97%
May 2, 2006 - Feb 6, 2007
#7N/A-30.92%
Jul 23, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007
#8N/A-21.90%
Nov 6, 2007 - Feb 25, 2008
#9N/A-20.12%
Jan 5, 2004 - Apr 1, 2004
#10N/A-19.03%
Oct 4, 2004 - Nov 29, 2004
#11N/A-17.10%
Feb 22, 2007 - Apr 4, 2007
#12N/A-16.48%
Nov 30, 2004 - Feb 18, 2005
#13N/A-16.33%
Oct 3, 2005 - Dec 1, 2005
#14N/A-14.38%
Sep 12, 2003 - Oct 14, 2003
#15N/A-12.32%
Feb 27, 2008 - Apr 3, 2008

Correlation

Correlation between CIG-C and GGB is 0.70 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.70
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CIG-C vs GGB dividend yield comparison.

YearCIG-CGGB
20264.19%1.18%
20259.26%3.05%
20247.82%5.06%
20233.72%6.63%
20227.83%12.79%
20216.79%11.48%
20203.37%1.34%
20192.87%1.48%
20180.23%1.60%
20171.41%0.34%
20166.86%0.38%
20150.00%4.16%
20140.00%2.56%
20130.00%1.03%
20120.00%1.54%
20110.00%2.38%
20100.00%2.00%
20090.00%0.57%
20080.00%12.10%
20070.00%3.18%
20060.00%3.35%
20050.00%4.94%
20040.00%3.41%
20030.00%3.35%
20020.00%6.38%
20010.00%5.30%
20000.00%6.43%
19990.00%1.52%

Select Stocks to Compare