CIB vs PAA
Comparison between Bancolombia S.A. (CIB, Company) and Plains All American Pipeline LP (PAA, Company).
CIB is from the Financial Services sector, while PAA is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceCIB has outperformed PAA, delivering a return of +34.2% compared to +24.8%
CIB vs PAA - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CIB vs PAA - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CIB vs PAA - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CIB | PAA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +35.69% | +30.83% |
| 2025 | +118.38% | +12.89% |
| 2024 | +12.01% | +20.30% |
| 2023 | +28.05% | +41.76% |
| 2022 | -0.70% | +29.16% |
| 2021 | -19.63% | +22.77% |
| 2020 | -22.76% | -51.59% |
| 2019 | +42.81% | -4.79% |
| 2018 | -3.59% | -0.78% |
| 2017 | +9.82% | -32.18% |
| 2016 | +43.66% | +47.77% |
| 2015 | -42.23% | -52.83% |
| 2014 | +1.94% | +4.33% |
| 2013 | -25.52% | +15.07% |
| 2012 | +13.34% | +29.64% |
| 2011 | -1.62% | +23.81% |
| 2010 | +39.24% | +23.90% |
| 2009 | +97.02% | +54.76% |
| 2008 | -29.14% | -27.32% |
| 2007 | +11.43% | +8.11% |
| 2006 | +5.07% | +35.05% |
| 2005 | +113.54% | +13.80% |
| 2004 | +178.48% | +23.97% |
| 2003 | +125.01% | +42.14% |
| 2002 | +56.04% | +2.87% |
| 2001 | -24.12% | +44.42% |
| 2000 | -56.14% | +60.45% |
| 1999 | +5.59% | -32.26% |
CIB vs PAA Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CIB was -78.22%, occurring on Oct 12, 2001. Recovery took 864 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for PAA was -91.97%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current PAA drawdown is -7.95%.
| Rank | CIB | PAA |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.22% Dec 6, 1999 - May 16, 2003 | -91.97% Sep 8, 2014 - Mar 18, 2020 |
| #2 | -70.97% Feb 1, 2013 - Jan 28, 2025 | -55.58% Jul 12, 2007 - Jan 4, 2010 |
| #3 | -63.32% May 2, 2008 - Sep 22, 2009 | -48.59% Nov 9, 1999 - Jul 21, 2000 |
| #4 | -41.93% Apr 4, 2006 - Jul 17, 2007 | -23.25% Sep 4, 2001 - Apr 16, 2003 |
| #5 | -25.43% Mar 7, 2005 - Jul 11, 2005 | -17.76% Sep 2, 2005 - Mar 24, 2006 |
| #6 | -24.03% Jan 29, 2026 - Jul 10, 2026 | -16.96% May 13, 2013 - May 2, 2014 |
| #7 | -22.98% Apr 22, 2004 - Sep 8, 2004 | -16.91% May 17, 2001 - Aug 17, 2001 |
| #8 | -22.95% Nov 1, 1999 - Dec 3, 1999 | -14.69% Apr 2, 2004 - Sep 23, 2004 |
| #9 | -20.91% Nov 6, 2007 - Apr 8, 2008 | -11.75% Jun 1, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006 |
| #10 | -20.11% May 3, 2012 - Jan 3, 2013 | -11.01% Apr 23, 2010 - Jun 3, 2010 |
| #11 | -19.99% Nov 4, 2010 - Jul 1, 2011 | -10.71% Jul 8, 2011 - Oct 21, 2011 |
| #12 | -19.42% Aug 19, 2005 - Nov 1, 2005 | -9.05% Nov 22, 2000 - Jan 10, 2001 |
| #13 | -19.22% Jul 19, 2007 - Oct 30, 2007 | -8.63% Mar 21, 2005 - Apr 21, 2005 |
| #14 | -18.41% Jul 1, 2011 - Apr 20, 2012 | -8.35% Mar 4, 2011 - Jul 7, 2011 |
| #15 | -14.49% Apr 3, 2025 - Apr 25, 2025 | -8.27% Aug 4, 2005 - Sep 2, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between CIB and PAA is 0.78 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CIB vs PAA dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CIB | PAA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.04% | 3.65% |
| 2025 | 6.90% | 8.46% |
| 2024 | 10.96% | 7.44% |
| 2023 | 10.92% | 7.06% |
| 2022 | 10.68% | 7.08% |
| 2021 | 0.87% | 7.71% |
| 2020 | 4.01% | 10.92% |
| 2019 | 2.41% | 7.50% |
| 2018 | 3.62% | 5.99% |
| 2017 | 3.21% | 9.45% |
| 2016 | 3.21% | 8.21% |
| 2015 | 4.49% | 11.93% |
| 2014 | 3.17% | 4.97% |
| 2013 | 3.28% | 4.49% |
| 2012 | 2.40% | 4.66% |
| 2011 | 2.38% | 5.32% |
| 2010 | 2.67% | 5.98% |
| 2009 | 2.51% | 6.85% |
| 2008 | 6.02% | 10.08% |
| 2007 | 4.24% | 6.31% |
| 2006 | 2.51% | 5.61% |
| 2005 | 2.34% | 6.51% |
| 2004 | 2.64% | 6.10% |
| 2003 | 3.19% | 6.74% |
| 2002 | 5.55% | 8.66% |
| 2001 | 3.99% | 7.50% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 9.54% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks