CIB vs MGA
Comparison between Bancolombia S.A. (CIB, Company) and Magna International Inc (MGA, Company).
CIB is from the Financial Services sector, while MGA is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.
5-Year PerformanceCIB has outperformed MGA, delivering a return of +33.0% compared to -3.5%
CIB vs MGA - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CIB vs MGA - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CIB vs MGA - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CIB | MGA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +28.86% | +24.66% |
| 2025 | +118.38% | +35.44% |
| 2024 | +12.01% | -26.45% |
| 2023 | +28.05% | +6.25% |
| 2022 | -0.70% | -28.62% |
| 2021 | -19.63% | +18.45% |
| 2020 | -22.76% | +31.85% |
| 2019 | +42.81% | +23.99% |
| 2018 | -3.59% | -19.10% |
| 2017 | +9.82% | +30.96% |
| 2016 | +43.66% | +11.28% |
| 2015 | -42.23% | -24.19% |
| 2014 | +1.94% | +36.73% |
| 2013 | -25.52% | +63.00% |
| 2012 | +13.34% | +50.70% |
| 2011 | -1.62% | -36.34% |
| 2010 | +39.24% | +97.20% |
| 2009 | +97.02% | +60.67% |
| 2008 | -29.14% | -60.24% |
| 2007 | +11.43% | +1.24% |
| 2006 | +5.07% | +13.08% |
| 2005 | +113.54% | -10.22% |
| 2004 | +178.48% | +3.66% |
| 2003 | +125.01% | +59.93% |
| 2002 | +56.04% | -8.30% |
| 2001 | -24.12% | +56.51% |
| 2000 | -56.14% | +4.73% |
| 1999 | +5.59% | -5.32% |
CIB vs MGA Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CIB was -78.22%, occurring on Oct 12, 2001. Recovery took 864 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for MGA was -79.02%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 756 trading sessions.
The current CIB drawdown is -3.66%. The current MGA drawdown is -22.29%.
| Rank | CIB | MGA |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.22% Dec 6, 1999 - May 16, 2003 | -79.02% Nov 6, 2007 - Nov 5, 2010 |
| #2 | -70.97% Feb 1, 2013 - Jan 28, 2025 | -66.02% Jun 4, 2021 - Apr 8, 2025 |
| #3 | -63.32% May 2, 2008 - Sep 22, 2009 | -61.83% May 21, 2018 - Nov 24, 2020 |
| #4 | -41.93% Apr 4, 2006 - Jul 17, 2007 | -48.18% Jan 27, 2011 - Mar 28, 2013 |
| #5 | -25.43% Mar 7, 2005 - Jul 11, 2005 | -46.40% Jun 10, 2015 - Nov 30, 2017 |
| #6 | -24.03% Jan 29, 2026 - May 15, 2026 | -35.25% May 2, 2002 - Jul 29, 2003 |
| #7 | -22.98% Apr 22, 2004 - Sep 8, 2004 | -31.55% Aug 13, 2001 - Jan 7, 2002 |
| #8 | -22.95% Nov 1, 1999 - Dec 3, 1999 | -28.42% Jun 30, 2004 - May 5, 2006 |
| #9 | -20.91% Nov 6, 2007 - Apr 8, 2008 | -25.61% Aug 27, 2014 - May 8, 2015 |
| #10 | -20.11% May 3, 2012 - Jan 3, 2013 | -23.90% Jun 5, 2000 - Apr 18, 2001 |
| #11 | -19.99% Nov 4, 2010 - Jul 1, 2011 | -20.98% Jan 18, 2000 - Apr 13, 2000 |
| #12 | -19.42% Aug 19, 2005 - Nov 1, 2005 | -17.53% Jul 16, 2007 - Sep 27, 2007 |
| #13 | -19.22% Jul 19, 2007 - Oct 30, 2007 | -15.40% May 5, 2006 - Dec 14, 2006 |
| #14 | -18.41% Jul 1, 2011 - Apr 20, 2012 | -12.91% Nov 15, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000 |
| #15 | -14.49% Apr 3, 2025 - Apr 25, 2025 | -12.48% Dec 14, 2006 - May 10, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between CIB and MGA is 0.60 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CIB vs MGA dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CIB | MGA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.52% | 1.48% |
| 2025 | 6.90% | 3.64% |
| 2024 | 10.96% | 4.55% |
| 2023 | 10.92% | 3.11% |
| 2022 | 10.68% | 4.22% |
| 2021 | 0.87% | 2.13% |
| 2020 | 4.01% | 2.26% |
| 2019 | 2.41% | 2.66% |
| 2018 | 3.62% | 2.18% |
| 2017 | 3.21% | 1.94% |
| 2016 | 3.21% | 2.30% |
| 2015 | 4.49% | 1.90% |
| 2014 | 3.17% | 1.40% |
| 2013 | 3.28% | 1.56% |
| 2012 | 2.40% | 2.20% |
| 2011 | 2.38% | 3.00% |
| 2010 | 2.67% | 0.81% |
| 2009 | 2.51% | 0.36% |
| 2008 | 6.02% | 5.41% |
| 2007 | 4.24% | 1.43% |
| 2006 | 2.51% | 1.89% |
| 2005 | 2.34% | 2.11% |
| 2004 | 2.64% | 1.79% |
| 2003 | 3.19% | 14.16% |
| 2002 | 5.55% | 3.49% |
| 2001 | 3.99% | 2.14% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 3.46% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.16% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks