CI vs ET
Comparison between Cigna Group (The) (CI, Company) and Energy Transfer LP (ET, Company).
CI is from the Healthcare sector, while ET is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceET has outperformed CI, delivering a return of +28.4% compared to +7.9%
CI vs ET - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CI vs ET - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CI vs ET - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CI | ET |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +0.53% | +34.62% |
| 2025 | +2.32% | -9.92% |
| 2024 | -9.48% | +53.00% |
| 2023 | -5.14% | +30.64% |
| 2022 | +43.83% | +47.20% |
| 2021 | +13.61% | +44.83% |
| 2020 | +1.60% | -46.91% |
| 2019 | +9.28% | +5.67% |
| 2018 | -6.22% | -20.06% |
| 2017 | +49.68% | -4.07% |
| 2016 | -8.95% | +51.16% |
| 2015 | +42.35% | -51.29% |
| 2014 | +19.45% | +45.35% |
| 2013 | +58.70% | +79.14% |
| 2012 | +23.78% | +18.95% |
| 2011 | +11.15% | +10.26% |
| 2010 | +0.92% | +33.30% |
| 2009 | +98.84% | +97.73% |
| 2008 | -68.86% | -50.58% |
| 2007 | +22.40% | +17.31% |
| 2006 | +17.26% | +41.76% |
| 2005 | +39.76% | N/A |
| 2004 | +43.22% | N/A |
| 2003 | +38.99% | N/A |
| 2002 | -54.53% | N/A |
| 2001 | -26.87% | N/A |
| 2000 | +71.09% | N/A |
| 1999 | +10.23% | N/A |
CI vs ET Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CI was -84.34%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 1265 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for ET was -87.82%, occurring on Feb 8, 2016. Recovery took 2309 trading sessions.
The current CI drawdown is -21.61%. The current ET drawdown is -1.07%.
| Rank | CI | ET |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -84.34% Jan 9, 2008 - Jan 17, 2013 | -87.82% Jun 15, 2015 - Aug 16, 2024 |
| #2 | -72.61% Dec 28, 2000 - Mar 10, 2006 | -66.17% Jul 6, 2007 - Jul 12, 2010 |
| #3 | -42.47% Jan 26, 2018 - Jan 20, 2021 | -29.34% Jun 21, 2011 - Feb 24, 2012 |
| #4 | -33.42% Mar 30, 2006 - Feb 1, 2007 | -25.04% Sep 10, 2014 - Nov 17, 2014 |
| #5 | -32.11% Sep 16, 2024 - Oct 31, 2025 | -24.55% Jan 30, 2025 - Mar 26, 2026 |
| #6 | -31.64% Jun 25, 2015 - Jun 19, 2017 | -22.07% Nov 18, 2014 - Feb 25, 2015 |
| #7 | -28.63% Nov 17, 1999 - May 18, 2000 | -21.10% Mar 19, 2012 - Aug 17, 2012 |
| #8 | -28.18% Dec 12, 2022 - Feb 9, 2024 | -12.67% Apr 27, 2011 - Jun 16, 2011 |
| #9 | -27.48% May 10, 2021 - Apr 20, 2022 | -11.31% May 21, 2013 - Jul 9, 2013 |
| #10 | -19.91% May 29, 2007 - Jan 9, 2008 | -9.04% Jul 25, 2014 - Aug 27, 2014 |
| #11 | -16.06% Aug 11, 2000 - Oct 2, 2000 | -8.36% Nov 29, 2024 - Jan 14, 2025 |
| #12 | -16.03% Jan 21, 2014 - May 29, 2014 | -8.04% May 19, 2026 - Jul 23, 2026 |
| #13 | -13.17% Sep 16, 2013 - Nov 19, 2013 | -7.96% Nov 9, 2010 - Feb 15, 2011 |
| #14 | -11.98% Apr 1, 2024 - Sep 3, 2024 | -7.09% Dec 11, 2012 - Jan 7, 2013 |
| #15 | -11.01% Jan 20, 2021 - Mar 5, 2021 | -7.09% May 10, 2006 - Sep 1, 2006 |
Correlation
Correlation between CI and ET is 0.79 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CI vs ET dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CI | ET |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.12% | 4.78% |
| 2025 | 2.19% | 7.97% |
| 2024 | 2.03% | 6.51% |
| 2023 | 1.64% | 8.95% |
| 2022 | 1.35% | 7.33% |
| 2021 | 1.74% | 7.41% |
| 2020 | 0.02% | 17.27% |
| 2019 | 0.02% | 9.51% |
| 2018 | 0.02% | 9.24% |
| 2017 | 0.02% | 6.66% |
| 2016 | 0.03% | 5.90% |
| 2015 | 0.03% | 7.42% |
| 2014 | 0.04% | 2.61% |
| 2013 | 0.05% | 3.19% |
| 2012 | 0.07% | 5.50% |
| 2011 | 0.10% | 5.79% |
| 2010 | 0.11% | 5.53% |
| 2009 | 0.11% | 6.89% |
| 2008 | 0.24% | 12.03% |
| 2007 | 0.07% | 4.14% |
| 2006 | 0.08% | 1.94% |
| 2005 | 0.09% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 0.50% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 2.30% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 3.21% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 1.38% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.94% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.37% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks