CI vs BAM
Comparison between Cigna Group (The) (CI, Company) and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd - Class A (BAM, Company).
CI is from the Healthcare sector, while BAM is from the Financial Services sector.
CI vs BAM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CI vs BAM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CI vs BAM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CI | BAM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.63% | -12.66% |
| 2025 | +2.32% | -0.56% |
| 2024 | -9.48% | +44.51% |
| 2023 | -5.14% | +46.61% |
| 2022 | +43.83% | -10.41% |
| 2021 | +13.61% | N/A |
| 2020 | +1.60% | N/A |
| 2019 | +9.28% | N/A |
| 2018 | -6.22% | N/A |
| 2017 | +49.68% | N/A |
| 2016 | -8.95% | N/A |
| 2015 | +42.35% | N/A |
| 2014 | +19.45% | N/A |
| 2013 | +58.70% | N/A |
| 2012 | +23.78% | N/A |
| 2011 | +11.15% | N/A |
| 2010 | +0.92% | N/A |
| 2009 | +98.84% | N/A |
| 2008 | -68.86% | N/A |
| 2007 | +22.40% | N/A |
| 2006 | +17.26% | N/A |
| 2005 | +39.76% | N/A |
| 2004 | +43.22% | N/A |
| 2003 | +38.99% | N/A |
| 2002 | -54.53% | N/A |
| 2001 | -26.87% | N/A |
| 2000 | +71.09% | N/A |
| 1999 | +10.23% | N/A |
CI vs BAM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CI was -84.34%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 1265 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for BAM was -30.36%, occurring on Mar 24, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CI drawdown is -19.20%. The current BAM drawdown is -24.97%.
| Rank | CI | BAM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -84.34% Jan 9, 2008 - Jan 17, 2013 | -30.36% Jul 24, 2025 - Mar 24, 2026 |
| #2 | -72.61% Dec 28, 2000 - Mar 10, 2006 | -29.54% Jan 29, 2025 - Jul 17, 2025 |
| #3 | -42.47% Jan 26, 2018 - Jan 20, 2021 | -20.47% Sep 15, 2023 - Dec 1, 2023 |
| #4 | -33.42% Mar 30, 2006 - Feb 1, 2007 | -17.87% Dec 2, 2022 - Feb 2, 2023 |
| #5 | -32.11% Sep 16, 2024 - Oct 31, 2025 | -13.12% Feb 15, 2023 - Aug 11, 2023 |
| #6 | -31.64% Jun 25, 2015 - Jun 19, 2017 | -12.04% Dec 11, 2024 - Jan 24, 2025 |
| #7 | -28.63% Nov 17, 1999 - May 18, 2000 | -11.72% Mar 21, 2024 - Jul 22, 2024 |
| #8 | -28.18% Dec 12, 2022 - Feb 9, 2024 | -11.57% Jul 31, 2024 - Sep 11, 2024 |
| #9 | -27.48% May 10, 2021 - Apr 20, 2022 | -8.01% Aug 14, 2023 - Sep 11, 2023 |
| #10 | -19.91% May 29, 2007 - Jan 9, 2008 | -6.41% Dec 27, 2023 - Jan 26, 2024 |
| #11 | -16.06% Aug 11, 2000 - Oct 2, 2000 | -4.84% Nov 11, 2024 - Nov 26, 2024 |
| #12 | -16.03% Jan 21, 2014 - May 29, 2014 | -4.61% Mar 7, 2024 - Mar 21, 2024 |
| #13 | -13.17% Sep 16, 2013 - Nov 19, 2013 | -4.58% Jan 29, 2024 - Feb 15, 2024 |
| #14 | -11.98% Apr 1, 2024 - Sep 3, 2024 | -2.84% Jul 22, 2024 - Jul 30, 2024 |
| #15 | -11.01% Jan 20, 2021 - Mar 5, 2021 | -2.50% Dec 1, 2023 - Dec 12, 2023 |
Correlation
Correlation between CI and BAM is 0.13 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CI vs BAM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CI | BAM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.09% | 2.20% |
| 2025 | 2.19% | 3.34% |
| 2024 | 2.03% | 2.80% |
| 2023 | 1.64% | 3.19% |
| 2022 | 1.35% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 1.74% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 0.03% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 0.03% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 0.05% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 0.10% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.11% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 0.11% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 0.24% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 0.08% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 0.09% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 0.50% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 2.30% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 3.21% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 1.38% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.94% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.37% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks