StockComparison Logo
vs

CHT vs LVS

Comparison between Chunghwa Telecom (CHT, Company) and Las Vegas Sands Corp (LVS, Company).

CHT is from the Communication Services sector, while LVS is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceCHT has outperformed LVS, delivering a return of +4.3% compared to +3.7%

CHT vs LVS - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CHT
$32B
LVS
$31B
Max Drawdown
Winner
CHT
48.20%
LVS
99.02%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CHT
-0.22
LVS
-0.24
5Y Beta
Winner
CHT
0.17
LVS
0.92
Industry
CHT
Telecom Services
LVS
Resorts & Casinos
P/E Ratio
CHT
26.70
Winner
LVS
18.73
Forward P/E
CHT
26.53
Winner
LVS
15.58
PEG Ratio
CHT
6.00
Winner
LVS
0.63
Dividend Yield
Winner
CHT
3.88%
LVS
2.45%
5Y EPS CAGR
CHT
0.68%
LVS
N/A
Debt to Equity
CHT
10.03%
Winner
LVS
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
CHT
5.03%
Winner
LVS
8.59%
P/S Ratio
Winner
CHT
0.14
LVS
2.29
P/B Ratio
Winner
CHT
2.74
LVS
55.03

CHT vs LVS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CHT
-0.98%
Winner
LVS
-0.93%
3M
Winner
CHT
+1.32%
LVS
-11.69%
6M
Winner
CHT
+5.50%
LVS
-18.06%
1Y
Winner
CHT
-3.05%
LVS
-10.25%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CHT
+4.32%
LVS
+3.69%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CHT
+5.46%
LVS
+1.68%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CHT
+10.18%
LVS
+2.11%

CHT vs LVS - Annual Returns (2003 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCHTLVS
2026+4.64%-28.45%
2025+15.49%+33.24%
2024+0.63%+1.80%
2023+9.01%+0.51%
2022-9.52%+23.73%
2021+12.87%-35.05%
2020+8.87%-14.19%
2019+9.33%+34.00%
2018+3.67%-21.12%
2017+15.98%+36.42%
2016+10.57%+30.05%
2015+6.34%-17.88%
2014-0.47%-24.69%
2013+0.10%+65.48%
2012+7.65%+12.57%
2011+38.86%-6.27%
2010+43.01%+176.47%
2009+34.35%+110.72%
2008-14.41%-94.09%
2007+2.08%+12.01%
2006+11.40%+131.33%
2005-6.57%-18.64%
2004+59.36%+3.09%
2003-2.62%N/A

CHT vs LVS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CHT was -44.43%, occurring on Oct 24, 2008. Recovery took 595 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for LVS was -99.02%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current CHT drawdown is -5.60%. The current LVS drawdown is -49.40%.

RankCHTLVS
#1-44.43%
Mar 24, 2008 - Aug 2, 2010
-99.02%
Oct 2, 2007 - Mar 9, 2009
#2-25.11%
May 8, 2006 - Feb 20, 2008
-43.98%
Dec 17, 2004 - Feb 16, 2006
#3-23.72%
Feb 23, 2022 - Sep 26, 2024
-32.93%
Jan 16, 2007 - Sep 11, 2007
#4-19.37%
Aug 3, 2005 - May 2, 2006
-23.70%
Jun 30, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006
#5-18.37%
Jul 20, 2011 - Jul 11, 2013
-15.73%
May 5, 2006 - Jun 29, 2006
#6-16.10%
Aug 11, 2016 - Jan 2, 2018
-11.76%
Mar 6, 2006 - Mar 30, 2006
#7-12.38%
Apr 19, 2004 - Jul 9, 2004
-8.61%
Dec 4, 2006 - Jan 10, 2007
#8-12.26%
Oct 30, 2003 - Jan 28, 2004
-6.20%
Apr 17, 2006 - May 4, 2006
#9-11.57%
Feb 25, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005
-4.50%
Sep 25, 2007 - Oct 2, 2007
#10-11.03%
Aug 19, 2025 - Jun 11, 2026
-4.38%
Feb 23, 2006 - Mar 6, 2006
#11-10.59%
Jul 22, 2013 - Aug 22, 2014
-3.20%
Nov 14, 2006 - Nov 24, 2006
#12-9.47%
Apr 10, 2018 - Oct 4, 2019
-3.03%
Mar 30, 2006 - Apr 4, 2006
#13-9.39%
Sep 26, 2024 - May 2, 2025
-2.82%
Sep 18, 2007 - Sep 24, 2007
#14-8.68%
Mar 18, 2004 - Apr 5, 2004
-2.60%
Nov 27, 2006 - Dec 4, 2006
#15-7.76%
Aug 28, 2014 - Feb 27, 2015
-2.49%
Apr 7, 2006 - Apr 12, 2006

Correlation

Correlation between CHT and LVS is 0.45 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.45
-101

Dividend Comparison (2004 - 2026)

CHT vs LVS dividend yield comparison.

YearCHTLVS
20263.93%1.96%
20254.00%1.54%
20243.91%1.56%
20233.91%0.81%
20224.35%0.00%
20213.67%0.00%
20203.67%1.33%
20193.91%4.46%
20184.44%5.76%
20173.64%4.20%
20164.32%5.39%
20153.88%5.93%
20144.51%3.44%
20134.68%1.78%
20128.89%8.12%
20115.74%0.00%
20104.97%0.00%
20094.89%0.00%
20086.49%0.00%
20075.78%0.00%
20065.32%0.00%
20056.34%0.00%
200410.10%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare