StockComparison Logo
vs

CHT vs IRM

Comparison between Chunghwa Telecom (CHT, Company) and Iron Mountain Inc (IRM, Company).

CHT is from the Communication Services sector, while IRM is from the Real Estate sector.

5-Year PerformanceIRM has outperformed CHT, delivering a return of +27.4% compared to +6.0%

CHT vs IRM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
CHT
$37B
Winner
IRM
$37B
Max Drawdown
Winner
CHT
48.20%
IRM
55.71%
Sharpe Ratio
CHT
0.34
Winner
IRM
0.87
5Y Beta
Winner
CHT
0.19
IRM
0.97
Industry
CHT
Telecom Services
IRM
Reit - Specialty
P/E Ratio
Winner
CHT
28.01
IRM
128.40
Forward P/E
Winner
CHT
26.53
IRM
62.50
PEG Ratio
CHT
2.99
Winner
IRM
0.99
Dividend Yield
Winner
CHT
3.59%
IRM
2.63%
5Y Dividends CAGR
CHT
1.89%
Winner
IRM
10.54%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
CHT
1.31%
IRM
-3.13%
Debt to Equity
CHT
10.03%
Winner
IRM
-1407.64%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CHT
4.25%
IRM
-1.73%
P/S Ratio
Winner
CHT
0.15
IRM
5.18
P/B Ratio
Winner
CHT
2.79
IRM
1732.39

CHT vs IRM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CHT
+6.39%
IRM
+0.76%
3M
CHT
+8.04%
Winner
IRM
+19.38%
6M
CHT
+11.33%
Winner
IRM
+55.41%
1Y
CHT
+5.55%
Winner
IRM
+28.34%
5Y(CAGR)
CHT
+5.98%
Winner
IRM
+27.41%
10Y(CAGR)
CHT
+6.93%
Winner
IRM
+19.08%
Max(CAGR)
CHT
+10.51%
Winner
IRM
+14.89%

CHT vs IRM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCHTIRM
2026+10.42%+54.00%
2025+15.49%-18.01%
2024+0.63%+57.51%
2023+9.01%+46.96%
2022-9.52%+1.94%
2021+12.87%+93.15%
2020+8.87%+5.56%
2019+9.33%+6.96%
2018+3.67%-7.72%
2017+15.98%+21.19%
2016+10.57%+28.26%
2015+6.34%-26.26%
2014-0.47%+53.68%
2013+0.10%-1.94%
2012+7.65%+15.95%
2011+38.86%+27.60%
2010+43.01%+10.94%
2009+34.35%-8.19%
2008-14.41%-31.13%
2007+2.08%+34.57%
2006+11.40%-1.69%
2005-6.57%+41.63%
2004+59.36%+16.64%
2003-2.62%+18.92%
2002N/A+11.94%
2001N/A+32.73%
2000N/A+4.04%
1999N/A+33.80%

CHT vs IRM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CHT was -44.43%, occurring on Oct 24, 2008. Recovery took 595 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for IRM was -55.71%, occurring on Mar 3, 2009. Recovery took 1209 trading sessions.

The current IRM drawdown is -3.70%.

RankCHTIRM
#1-44.43%
Mar 24, 2008 - Aug 2, 2010
-55.71%
Dec 26, 2007 - Oct 11, 2012
#2-25.11%
May 8, 2006 - Feb 20, 2008
-39.05%
Oct 28, 2024 - Apr 30, 2026
#3-23.72%
Feb 23, 2022 - Sep 26, 2024
-37.87%
Nov 24, 2017 - Jan 26, 2021
#4-19.37%
Aug 3, 2005 - May 2, 2006
-36.43%
Feb 5, 2015 - May 9, 2016
#5-18.37%
Jul 20, 2011 - Jul 11, 2013
-36.42%
Nov 9, 2005 - Feb 22, 2006
#6-16.10%
Aug 11, 2016 - Jan 2, 2018
-34.78%
May 15, 2002 - Nov 14, 2002
#7-12.38%
Apr 19, 2004 - Jul 9, 2004
-34.76%
May 10, 2013 - Sep 29, 2014
#8-12.26%
Oct 30, 2003 - Jan 28, 2004
-25.74%
Dec 31, 1999 - Mar 1, 2001
#9-11.57%
Feb 25, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005
-23.16%
Feb 22, 2006 - Aug 9, 2007
#10-11.03%
Aug 19, 2025 - Jun 11, 2026
-22.91%
Oct 27, 2004 - Aug 25, 2005
#11-10.59%
Jul 22, 2013 - Aug 22, 2014
-22.77%
Jul 26, 2016 - Aug 28, 2017
#12-9.47%
Apr 10, 2018 - Oct 4, 2019
-22.62%
Apr 20, 2022 - Feb 2, 2023
#13-9.39%
Sep 26, 2024 - May 2, 2025
-19.95%
Dec 28, 2021 - Mar 23, 2022
#14-8.68%
Mar 18, 2004 - Apr 5, 2004
-16.49%
Mar 6, 2001 - Jun 8, 2001
#15-7.76%
Aug 28, 2014 - Feb 27, 2015
-14.21%
Apr 23, 2003 - Jan 6, 2004

Correlation

Correlation between CHT and IRM is 0.81 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.81
-101

Dividend Comparison (2004 - 2026)

CHT vs IRM dividend yield comparison.

YearCHTIRM
20260.00%0.68%
20254.00%3.88%
20243.91%2.60%
20233.91%3.63%
20224.35%4.96%
20213.67%4.73%
20203.67%8.39%
20193.91%7.69%
20184.44%7.32%
20173.64%5.93%
20164.32%6.17%
20153.88%7.07%
20144.51%13.88%
20134.68%3.56%
20128.89%16.49%
20115.74%3.04%
20104.97%1.50%
20094.89%0.00%
20086.49%0.00%
20075.78%0.00%
20065.32%0.00%
20056.34%0.00%
200410.10%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare