StockComparison Logo
vs

CHRW vs TLK

Comparison between C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc (CHRW, Company) and Telkom Indonesia (Persero) Tbk PT (TLK, Company).

CHRW is from the Industrials sector, while TLK is from the Communication Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceCHRW has outperformed TLK, delivering a return of +15.3% compared to -2.5%

CHRW vs TLK - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CHRW
$21B
TLK
$21B
Max Drawdown
Winner
CHRW
43.44%
TLK
69.36%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CHRW
1.62
TLK
0.26
5Y Beta
Winner
CHRW
0.65
TLK
0.67
Industry
CHRW
Integrated Freight & Logistics
TLK
Telecom Services
P/E Ratio
CHRW
34.86
Winner
TLK
16.19
Forward P/E
CHRW
28.25
Winner
TLK
12.97
PEG Ratio
Winner
CHRW
1.95
TLK
4.86
Dividend Yield
CHRW
1.43%
Winner
TLK
7.75%
5Y Dividends CAGR
CHRW
8.87%
TLK
N/A
5Y EPS CAGR
CHRW
2.50%
TLK
N/A
Debt to Equity
CHRW
78.79%
TLK
N/A
Free Cash Flow Yield
CHRW
4.11%
TLK
N/A
P/S Ratio
CHRW
N/A
TLK
2.39
P/B Ratio
CHRW
N/A
TLK
2.57

CHRW vs TLK - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CHRW
-6.33%
Winner
TLK
-1.13%
3M
Winner
CHRW
-4.39%
TLK
-21.72%
6M
Winner
CHRW
+11.46%
TLK
-25.54%
1Y
Winner
CHRW
+84.84%
TLK
+4.24%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CHRW
+15.34%
TLK
-2.46%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CHRW
+11.48%
TLK
-1.76%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CHRW
+14.27%
TLK
+12.68%

CHRW vs TLK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCHRWTLK
2026+8.18%-21.02%
2025+59.79%+36.79%
2024+21.85%-32.73%
2023-1.73%+10.02%
2022-13.31%-15.21%
2021+19.07%+18.66%
2020+23.60%-13.38%
2019-3.44%+11.17%
2018-4.31%-18.50%
2017+25.23%+14.15%
2016+21.44%+34.82%
2015-14.01%+1.95%
2014+32.54%+35.78%
2013-5.32%-1.10%
2012-7.46%+25.03%
2011-12.94%-11.05%
2010+37.38%-9.79%
2009+7.19%+63.08%
2008+7.86%-36.25%
2007+26.85%-8.14%
2006+11.07%+91.76%
2005+36.39%+14.48%
2004+48.07%+27.19%
2003+20.46%+108.49%
2002+9.33%+57.31%
2001-2.53%+42.01%
2000+61.78%N/A
1999+20.26%N/A

CHRW vs TLK Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CHRW was -42.38%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 561 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for TLK was -67.42%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1373 trading sessions.

The current CHRW drawdown is -11.71%. The current TLK drawdown is -37.66%.

RankCHRWTLK
#1-42.38%
May 6, 2008 - Jul 28, 2010
-67.42%
Oct 12, 2007 - Mar 28, 2013
#2-40.56%
Aug 25, 2022 - Dec 12, 2024
-53.99%
May 4, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025
#3-37.68%
Sep 10, 2018 - Aug 10, 2020
-52.95%
Aug 22, 2017 - Apr 14, 2022
#4-35.12%
Jul 7, 2011 - Dec 19, 2014
-45.11%
Feb 2, 2001 - Aug 13, 2001
#5-31.29%
Mar 7, 2000 - May 5, 2000
-39.35%
Jun 17, 2002 - Apr 9, 2003
#6-27.50%
Jul 3, 2006 - Apr 25, 2007
-34.14%
Aug 22, 2001 - Jan 31, 2002
#7-27.33%
Dec 8, 2000 - Mar 22, 2002
-29.63%
May 20, 2013 - Jul 21, 2014
#8-25.14%
Apr 16, 2002 - Apr 15, 2003
-29.03%
Apr 26, 2004 - Oct 19, 2004
#9-24.72%
Jul 31, 2000 - Dec 7, 2000
-27.69%
Dec 2, 2004 - Jul 21, 2005
#10-23.29%
Dec 12, 2024 - Jul 31, 2025
-26.99%
May 10, 2006 - Oct 5, 2006
#11-20.50%
Jan 6, 2022 - Mar 29, 2022
-25.82%
Sep 8, 2014 - Jan 22, 2016
#12-20.27%
Dec 24, 2014 - Apr 19, 2016
-23.50%
Jul 22, 2005 - Dec 9, 2005
#13-20.07%
Feb 6, 2026 - May 14, 2026
-21.18%
Jan 21, 2004 - Apr 20, 2004
#14-19.86%
May 5, 2000 - Jul 12, 2000
-20.75%
Jul 13, 2007 - Oct 2, 2007
#15-19.85%
Apr 25, 2007 - Feb 1, 2008
-19.67%
Jan 3, 2007 - Apr 27, 2007

Correlation

Correlation between CHRW and TLK is 0.78 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.78
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CHRW vs TLK dividend yield comparison.

YearCHRWTLK
20260.36%0.00%
20251.55%6.19%
20242.38%6.76%
20232.82%4.39%
20222.47%4.36%
20211.93%0.99%
20202.17%4.59%
20192.57%2.66%
20182.24%0.92%
20172.03%2.73%
20162.38%2.88%
20152.53%3.05%
20141.91%3.96%
20132.40%4.84%
20122.12%4.22%
20111.72%4.51%
20101.30%3.59%
20091.65%3.26%
20081.64%6.87%
20071.40%3.08%
20061.39%2.59%
20050.96%2.11%
20040.92%2.75%
20030.95%4.15%
20020.83%4.77%
20010.73%2.32%
20000.54%0.00%
19990.20%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare