StockComparison Logo
vs

CHRW vs GIS

Comparison between C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc (CHRW, Company) and General Mills Inc (GIS, Company).

CHRW is from the Industrials sector, while GIS is from the Consumer Defensive sector.

5-Year PerformanceCHRW has outperformed GIS, delivering a return of +13.9% compared to -5.3%

CHRW vs GIS - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CHRW
$21B
GIS
$20B
Max Drawdown
Winner
CHRW
43.44%
GIS
64.50%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CHRW
0.87
GIS
-0.91
5Y Beta
CHRW
0.67
Winner
GIS
-0.02
Industry
CHRW
Integrated Freight & Logistics
GIS
Packaged Foods
P/E Ratio
CHRW
34.32
Winner
GIS
-217.00
Forward P/E
CHRW
25.06
Winner
GIS
11.64
PEG Ratio
Winner
CHRW
1.92
GIS
11.74
Dividend Yield
CHRW
1.70%
Winner
GIS
6.78%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
CHRW
8.94%
GIS
8.38%
5Y EPS CAGR
CHRW
2.50%
GIS
N/A
Debt to Equity
Winner
CHRW
78.79%
GIS
182.80%
Free Cash Flow Yield
CHRW
4.18%
Winner
GIS
7.97%
P/S Ratio
CHRW
1.26
Winner
GIS
1.11
P/B Ratio
CHRW
11.71
Winner
GIS
2.75

CHRW vs GIS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CHRW
-18.49%
Winner
GIS
-2.05%
3M
CHRW
-3.70%
Winner
GIS
+6.88%
6M
Winner
CHRW
-21.59%
GIS
-22.82%
1Y
Winner
CHRW
+36.68%
GIS
-21.64%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CHRW
+13.94%
GIS
-5.27%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CHRW
+11.03%
GIS
-2.85%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CHRW
+13.62%
GIS
+5.27%

CHRW vs GIS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCHRWGIS
2026-4.82%-17.01%
2025+59.79%-23.47%
2024+21.85%-1.02%
2023-1.73%-19.36%
2022-13.31%+28.33%
2021+19.07%+18.08%
2020+23.60%+16.71%
2019-3.44%+45.02%
2018-4.31%-31.26%
2017+25.23%-1.15%
2016+21.44%+10.72%
2015-14.01%+11.99%
2014+32.54%+11.42%
2013-5.32%+24.51%
2012-7.46%+3.57%
2011-12.94%+17.50%
2010+37.38%+3.34%
2009+7.19%+21.00%
2008+7.86%+10.38%
2007+26.85%+1.88%
2006+11.07%+19.31%
2005+36.39%+3.57%
2004+48.07%+13.29%
2003+20.46%-2.66%
2002+9.33%-5.66%
2001-2.53%+21.28%
2000+61.78%+33.37%
1999+20.26%-16.74%

CHRW vs GIS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CHRW was -42.38%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 561 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for GIS was -59.65%, occurring on Jun 3, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current CHRW drawdown is -26.11%. The current GIS drawdown is -53.84%.

RankCHRWGIS
#1-42.38%
May 6, 2008 - Jul 28, 2010
-59.65%
May 12, 2023 - Jun 3, 2026
#2-40.56%
Aug 25, 2022 - Dec 12, 2024
-45.07%
Jul 19, 2016 - May 13, 2020
#3-37.68%
Sep 10, 2018 - Aug 10, 2020
-31.76%
Oct 1, 2008 - Nov 13, 2009
#4-35.12%
Jul 7, 2011 - Dec 19, 2014
-29.42%
Nov 1, 1999 - Oct 31, 2000
#5-31.29%
Mar 7, 2000 - May 5, 2000
-26.09%
Dec 27, 2001 - Dec 23, 2004
#6-29.84%
Jul 21, 2026 - Jul 30, 2026
-18.07%
Mar 5, 2001 - Sep 10, 2001
#7-27.50%
Jul 3, 2006 - Apr 25, 2007
-15.87%
Aug 4, 2020 - Nov 3, 2021
#8-27.33%
Dec 8, 2000 - Mar 22, 2002
-15.14%
Feb 1, 2005 - May 25, 2006
#9-25.14%
Apr 16, 2002 - Apr 15, 2003
-13.66%
Dec 8, 2022 - Apr 5, 2023
#10-24.72%
Jul 31, 2000 - Dec 7, 2000
-13.11%
Jun 17, 2010 - Apr 20, 2011
#11-23.29%
Dec 12, 2024 - Jul 31, 2025
-12.89%
Dec 6, 2007 - Apr 1, 2008
#12-20.50%
Jan 6, 2022 - Mar 29, 2022
-11.79%
May 19, 2011 - Oct 10, 2011
#13-20.27%
Dec 24, 2014 - Apr 19, 2016
-10.92%
Jan 14, 2022 - Apr 7, 2022
#14-20.07%
Feb 6, 2026 - Jul 14, 2026
-10.66%
Jun 4, 2014 - Jan 20, 2015
#15-19.86%
May 5, 2000 - Jul 12, 2000
-10.19%
Jun 4, 2007 - Dec 6, 2007

Correlation

Correlation between CHRW and GIS is 0.77 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.77
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CHRW vs GIS dividend yield comparison.

YearCHRWGIS
20260.81%5.06%
20251.55%5.20%
20242.38%3.73%
20232.82%3.47%
20222.47%2.50%
20211.93%3.03%
20202.17%3.37%
20192.57%3.66%
20182.24%5.03%
20172.03%3.27%
20162.38%3.01%
20152.53%3.00%
20141.91%3.02%
20132.40%2.85%
20122.12%3.14%
20111.72%2.90%
20101.30%2.95%
20091.65%2.54%
20081.64%2.72%
20071.40%2.67%
20061.39%2.40%
20050.96%2.60%
20040.92%2.35%
20030.95%2.43%
20020.83%2.34%
20010.73%2.11%
20000.54%2.47%
19990.20%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare