StockComparison Logo
vs

CHDN vs EAT

Comparison between Churchill Downs Inc (CHDN, Company) and Brinker International Inc (EAT, Company).

Both CHDN and EAT are from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceEAT has outperformed CHDN, delivering a return of +19.9% compared to -2.0%

CHDN vs EAT - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CHDN
$6.08B
EAT
$6.07B
Max Drawdown
Winner
CHDN
62.86%
EAT
88.76%
Sharpe Ratio
CHDN
-0.19
Winner
EAT
-0.17
5Y Beta
Winner
CHDN
0.70
EAT
1.18
Industry
CHDN
Gambling
EAT
Restaurants
P/E Ratio
CHDN
15.00
Winner
EAT
13.37
Forward P/E
CHDN
25.32
Winner
EAT
11.51
PEG Ratio
CHDN
4.68
Winner
EAT
0.32
Dividend Yield
CHDN
0.53%
EAT
N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR
CHDN
7.09%
Winner
EAT
7.56%
5Y EPS CAGR
CHDN
20.14%
Winner
EAT
134.57%
Debt to Equity
CHDN
449.64%
Winner
EAT
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
CHDN
0.80%
Winner
EAT
8.31%
P/S Ratio
CHDN
2.06
Winner
EAT
1.06
P/B Ratio
Winner
CHDN
5.52
EAT
14.95

CHDN vs EAT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CHDN
-9.00%
Winner
EAT
-4.23%
3M
CHDN
-4.28%
Winner
EAT
-0.37%
6M
CHDN
-18.69%
Winner
EAT
-6.27%
1Y
Winner
CHDN
-2.87%
EAT
-19.35%
5Y(CAGR)
CHDN
-1.97%
Winner
EAT
+19.86%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CHDN
+16.19%
EAT
+13.80%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CHDN
+14.12%
EAT
+11.97%

CHDN vs EAT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCHDNEAT
2026-19.81%-6.36%
2025-13.20%+4.25%
2024+0.03%+214.45%
2023+28.78%+33.19%
2022-10.37%-15.29%
2021+28.24%-31.71%
2020+43.94%+35.41%
2019+70.53%-2.94%
2018+3.10%+15.34%
2017+57.50%-17.84%
2016+11.55%+7.61%
2015+52.52%-16.52%
2014+7.39%+31.31%
2013+31.02%+48.16%
2012+32.17%+20.09%
2011+18.78%+28.59%
2010+13.80%+46.71%
2009-8.06%+37.16%
2008-22.35%-42.24%
2007+29.83%-32.98%
2006+12.93%+19.92%
2005-14.62%+11.06%
2004+24.52%+6.11%
2003-3.72%+1.72%
2002+10.56%+9.73%
2001+32.77%+24.21%
2000+33.29%+79.79%
1999+10.39%+4.05%

CHDN vs EAT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CHDN was -62.86%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 121 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for EAT was -88.40%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 1304 trading sessions.

The current CHDN drawdown is -39.17%. The current EAT drawdown is -24.99%.

RankCHDNEAT
#1-62.86%
Feb 19, 2020 - Aug 11, 2020
-88.40%
Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 23, 2012
#2-60.50%
Dec 24, 2007 - Jan 24, 2012
-85.67%
Feb 19, 2015 - Dec 9, 2020
#3-43.72%
May 1, 2023 - May 26, 2026
-71.67%
Mar 15, 2021 - Sep 23, 2024
#4-32.98%
Aug 2, 2005 - Apr 17, 2007
-45.92%
Feb 3, 2025 - Nov 6, 2025
#5-32.22%
Oct 18, 2021 - Mar 31, 2023
-30.45%
Mar 9, 2001 - Jan 7, 2002
#6-30.29%
Mar 12, 2021 - Oct 14, 2021
-29.14%
Mar 6, 2002 - Jun 3, 2003
#7-27.54%
Feb 28, 2002 - Nov 4, 2004
-25.79%
Mar 17, 2006 - Oct 24, 2006
#8-27.42%
Dec 12, 2000 - Dec 28, 2001
-25.42%
Mar 5, 2004 - Jun 9, 2005
#9-27.25%
May 21, 2018 - Jun 5, 2019
-25.13%
May 16, 2000 - Oct 9, 2000
#10-20.78%
Nov 6, 2015 - Sep 8, 2016
-23.80%
Jan 20, 2000 - Mar 16, 2000
#11-20.61%
Dec 1, 2004 - Jul 29, 2005
-20.21%
Sep 10, 2012 - Mar 8, 2013
#12-19.77%
Feb 3, 2000 - Mar 31, 2000
-19.91%
Jul 8, 2003 - Feb 12, 2004
#13-18.81%
Nov 19, 1999 - Dec 22, 1999
-18.97%
Feb 28, 2014 - Oct 30, 2014
#14-17.78%
Mar 31, 2000 - Oct 13, 2000
-18.62%
Nov 15, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000
#15-17.68%
Sep 2, 2020 - Nov 9, 2020
-17.70%
Dec 4, 2000 - Feb 16, 2001

Correlation

Correlation between CHDN and EAT is 0.65 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.65
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2025)

CHDN vs EAT dividend yield comparison.

YearCHDNEAT
20250.38%0.00%
20240.31%0.00%
20230.28%0.00%
20220.34%0.00%
20210.28%0.00%
20200.32%0.67%
20190.42%3.62%
20180.67%3.46%
20170.65%3.71%
20160.88%2.67%
20150.81%2.50%
20141.05%1.77%
20130.97%1.90%
20121.08%2.32%
20111.15%2.24%
20101.15%2.54%
20091.34%2.95%
20081.24%4.17%
20070.93%1.94%
20061.17%0.86%
20051.36%0.26%
20041.12%0.00%
20031.37%0.00%
20021.31%0.00%
20011.35%0.00%
20001.68%0.00%
199919.95%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare