CHCI vs TUSK

Comparison between Comstock Holding Co. Inc - Class A (CHCI, Company) and Mammoth Energy Services Inc (TUSK, Company).

CHCI is from the Real Estate sector, while TUSK is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceCHCI has outperformed TUSK, delivering a return of +19.5% compared to -3.1%

CHCI vs TUSK - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CHCI(COMPANY)	TUSK(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$162M	$162M
Max Drawdown	99.80%	98.58%
Sharpe Ratio	0.95	0.40
5Y Beta	0.59	0.85
Industry	Real Estate Services	Conglomerates
P/E Ratio	28.84	15.78
Forward P/E	12.90	17.54
PEG Ratio	0.81	0.00
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-0.96%	-61.19%
P/S Ratio	2.54	2.98
P/B Ratio	2.24	0.61

Market Cap

CHCI

$162M

Winner

TUSK

$162M

Max Drawdown

CHCI

99.80%

Winner

TUSK

98.58%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

CHCI

0.95

TUSK

0.40

5Y Beta

Winner

CHCI

0.59

TUSK

0.85

Industry

CHCI

Real Estate Services

TUSK

Conglomerates

P/E Ratio

CHCI

28.84

Winner

TUSK

15.78

Forward P/E

Winner

CHCI

12.90

TUSK

17.54

PEG Ratio

CHCI

0.81

Winner

TUSK

0.00

Debt to Equity

CHCI

0.00%

TUSK

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

CHCI

-0.96%

TUSK

-61.19%

P/S Ratio

Winner

CHCI

2.54

TUSK

2.98

P/B Ratio

CHCI

2.24

Winner

TUSK

0.61

CHCI vs TUSK - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CHCI	TUSK
1 month	-7.63%	+11.90%
3 months	+34.11%	+51.96%
6 months	+21.48%	+85.88%
1 year	+55.01%	+17.50%
5 years(CAGR)	+19.51%	-3.14%
10 years(CAGR)	+24.12%	-13.24%
Max(CAGR)	-8.96%	-13.24%

CHCI

-7.63%

Winner

TUSK

+11.90%

CHCI

+34.11%

Winner

TUSK

+51.96%

CHCI

+21.48%

Winner

TUSK

+85.88%

Winner

CHCI

+55.01%

TUSK

+17.50%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

CHCI

+19.51%

TUSK

-3.14%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

CHCI

+24.12%

TUSK

-13.24%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

CHCI

-8.96%

TUSK

-13.24%

CHCI vs TUSK - Annual Returns (2004 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CHCI	TUSK
2026	+30.41%	+67.01%
2025	+41.71%	-37.92%
2024	+77.37%	-32.13%
2023	+11.91%	-33.73%
2022	-9.96%	+348.19%
2021	+62.21%	-58.45%
2020	+63.43%	+103.20%
2019	+6.91%	-88.38%
2018	+6.33%	-11.08%
2017	-8.60%	+27.63%
2016	+20.00%	+14.63%
2015	-80.13%	N/A
2014	-47.98%	N/A
2013	+73.91%	N/A
2012	+1.75%	N/A
2011	-3.78%	N/A
2010	+30.68%	N/A
2009	+181.13%	N/A
2008	-72.14%	N/A
2007	-89.16%	N/A
2006	-60.54%	N/A
2005	-36.73%	N/A
2004	+31.16%	N/A

CHCI vs TUSK Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CHCI was -99.80%, occurring on Jul 17, 2008. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for TUSK was -98.55%, occurring on Apr 7, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current CHCI drawdown is -92.49%. The current TUSK drawdown is -91.77%.

Rank	CHCI	TUSK
#1	-99.80% Feb 28, 2005 - Jul 17, 2008	-98.55% Jun 22, 2018 - Apr 7, 2020
#2	-13.59% Jan 3, 2005 - Jan 19, 2005	-50.78% Mar 1, 2017 - Jan 8, 2018
#3	-12.35% Feb 4, 2005 - Feb 17, 2005	-19.17% Jan 23, 2018 - Feb 26, 2018
#4	-6.22% Feb 23, 2005 - Feb 28, 2005	-15.36% Dec 6, 2016 - Jan 13, 2017
#5	-2.55% Dec 23, 2004 - Dec 28, 2004	-13.33% Oct 24, 2016 - Nov 15, 2016
#6	-2.06% Jan 27, 2005 - Feb 3, 2005	-13.18% May 21, 2018 - May 29, 2018
#7	-1.76% Dec 28, 2004 - Dec 31, 2004	-12.82% Mar 12, 2018 - Apr 4, 2018
#8	-1.48% Jan 21, 2005 - Jan 26, 2005	-11.74% Apr 18, 2018 - May 17, 2018
#9	-0.89% Jan 19, 2005 - Jan 21, 2005	-8.47% Jun 6, 2018 - Jun 21, 2018
#10	N/A	-4.92% Jan 20, 2017 - Feb 3, 2017
#11	N/A	-4.52% Apr 4, 2018 - Apr 18, 2018
#12	N/A	-4.19% Feb 3, 2017 - Feb 14, 2017
#13	N/A	-4.02% May 29, 2018 - Jun 6, 2018
#14	N/A	-3.84% Jan 12, 2018 - Jan 19, 2018
#15	N/A	-2.93% Jan 9, 2018 - Jan 11, 2018

Correlation

Correlation between CHCI and TUSK is -0.43 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.

-0.43

-101