CFG vs FTS

Comparison between Citizens Financial Group Inc (CFG, Company) and Fortis Inc (FTS, Company).

CFG is from the Financial Services sector, while FTS is from the Utilities sector.

5-Year PerformanceCFG has outperformed FTS, delivering a return of +13.3% compared to +8.6%

CFG vs FTS - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CFG(COMPANY)	FTS(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$29B	$28B
Max Drawdown	68.00%	34.36%
Sharpe Ratio	2.05	1.30
5Y Beta	1.15	-0.02
Industry	Banks - Regional	Utilities - Regulated Electric
P/E Ratio	14.60	19.91
Forward P/E	13.02	21.93
PEG Ratio	0.46	1.88
Dividend Yield	2.62%	4.47%
5Y Dividends CAGR	7.31%	7.87%
5Y EPS CAGR	3.71%	3.80%
Debt to Equity	47.05%	142.25%
Free Cash Flow Yield	9.31%	-4.81%

Market Cap

Winner

CFG

$29B

FTS

$28B

Max Drawdown

CFG

68.00%

Winner

FTS

34.36%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

CFG

2.05

FTS

1.30

5Y Beta

CFG

1.15

Winner

FTS

-0.02

Industry

CFG

Banks - Regional

FTS

Utilities - Regulated Electric

P/E Ratio

Winner

CFG

14.60

FTS

19.91

Forward P/E

Winner

CFG

13.02

FTS

21.93

PEG Ratio

Winner

CFG

0.46

FTS

1.88

Dividend Yield

CFG

2.62%

Winner

FTS

4.47%

5Y Dividends CAGR

CFG

7.31%

Winner

FTS

7.87%

5Y EPS CAGR

CFG

3.71%

Winner

FTS

3.80%

Debt to Equity

Winner

CFG

47.05%

FTS

142.25%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

CFG

9.31%

FTS

-4.81%

CFG vs FTS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CFG	FTS
1 month	+9.68%	+1.82%
3 months	+19.29%	-1.69%
6 months	+16.45%	+10.83%
1 year	+67.58%	+22.63%
5 years(CAGR)	+13.30%	+8.58%
10 years(CAGR)	+16.54%	+9.92%
Max(CAGR)	+13.36%	+11.96%

Winner

CFG

+9.68%

FTS

+1.82%

Winner

CFG

+19.29%

FTS

-1.69%

Winner

CFG

+16.45%

FTS

+10.83%

Winner

CFG

+67.58%

FTS

+22.63%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

CFG

+13.30%

FTS

+8.58%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

CFG

+16.54%

FTS

+9.92%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

CFG

+13.36%

FTS

+11.96%

CFG vs FTS - Annual Returns (2014 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CFG	FTS
2026	+14.53%	+9.89%
2025	+39.15%	+30.22%
2024	+36.46%	+5.99%
2023	-11.29%	+6.17%
2022	-16.71%	-12.70%
2021	+37.87%	+22.76%
2020	-7.00%	+2.27%
2019	+38.20%	+30.07%
2018	-28.63%	-5.13%
2017	+19.13%	+25.09%
2016	+40.90%	+23.55%
2015	+7.46%	N/A
2014	+8.17%	N/A

CFG vs FTS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CFG was -65.60%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 771 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for FTS was -34.36%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 271 trading sessions.

The current CFG drawdown is -0.84%. The current FTS drawdown is -3.40%.

Rank	CFG	FTS
#1	-65.60% Jan 23, 2018 - Feb 16, 2021	-34.36% Feb 18, 2020 - Mar 16, 2021
#2	-56.14% Jan 14, 2022 - Jul 17, 2025	-29.96% Apr 6, 2022 - Mar 31, 2025
#3	-35.12% Jun 5, 2015 - Nov 9, 2016	-16.05% Nov 24, 2017 - Mar 12, 2019
#4	-18.80% May 17, 2021 - Oct 20, 2021	-14.04% Jul 6, 2016 - Apr 12, 2017
#5	-18.32% Feb 6, 2026 - Jun 12, 2026	-13.81% Feb 4, 2016 - Mar 7, 2016
#6	-18.25% Mar 1, 2017 - Nov 29, 2017	-7.75% Jan 13, 2016 - Jan 22, 2016
#7	-12.83% Nov 24, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022	-7.63% Sep 26, 2019 - Jan 15, 2020
#8	-10.39% Oct 6, 2025 - Nov 25, 2025	-6.63% May 7, 2025 - Aug 1, 2025
#9	-10.00% Dec 24, 2014 - Feb 13, 2015	-6.49% Dec 31, 2021 - Mar 17, 2022
#10	-8.93% Feb 24, 2021 - Apr 28, 2021	-6.21% Mar 16, 2026 - Jun 1, 2026
#11	-7.00% Oct 1, 2014 - Oct 29, 2014	-6.13% Apr 3, 2025 - Apr 14, 2025
#12	-6.44% Oct 20, 2021 - Nov 23, 2021	-5.83% Sep 8, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017
#13	-6.42% Dec 27, 2016 - Jan 25, 2017	-5.77% Aug 16, 2021 - Dec 14, 2021
#14	-6.25% Mar 17, 2015 - Apr 23, 2015	-5.39% Jun 15, 2021 - Aug 16, 2021
#15	-5.67% Jul 23, 2025 - Aug 22, 2025	-4.76% Apr 17, 2017 - Jun 5, 2017

Correlation

Correlation between CFG and FTS is 0.86 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.86

-101

Dividend Comparison (2014 - 2026)

CFG vs FTS dividend yield comparison.

Year	CFG	FTS
2026	1.37%	1.67%
2025	2.94%	3.42%
2024	3.84%	4.62%
2023	5.07%	4.50%
2022	4.11%	4.48%
2021	3.30%	3.40%
2020	4.36%	3.54%
2019	3.35%	3.31%
2018	3.30%	3.35%
2017	1.52%	4.43%
2016	1.29%	4.94%
2015	1.53%	0.00%
2014	0.40%	0.00%