StockComparison Logo
vs

CFG vs BAP

Comparison between Citizens Financial Group Inc (CFG, Company) and Credicorp Ltd (BAP, Company).

Both CFG and BAP are from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceBAP has outperformed CFG, delivering a return of +32.9% compared to +13.0%

CFG vs BAP - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
CFG
$30B
Winner
BAP
$30B
Max Drawdown
CFG
68.00%
Winner
BAP
64.93%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CFG
2.02
BAP
1.87
5Y Beta
CFG
1.15
Winner
BAP
0.65
Industry
CFG
Banks - Regional
BAP
Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio
CFG
15.11
Winner
BAP
14.47
Forward P/E
CFG
13.53
Winner
BAP
12.64
PEG Ratio
CFG
0.47
Winner
BAP
0.43
Dividend Yield
CFG
2.55%
Winner
BAP
3.83%
5Y Dividends CAGR
CFG
7.31%
BAP
N/A
5Y EPS CAGR
CFG
3.71%
Winner
BAP
42.63%
Debt to Equity
Winner
CFG
47.05%
BAP
80.93%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CFG
8.99%
BAP
6.29%
P/S Ratio
CFG
3.73
Winner
BAP
1.36
P/B Ratio
Winner
CFG
1.22
BAP
2.58

CFG vs BAP - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CFG
+11.04%
BAP
+8.17%
3M
Winner
CFG
+19.79%
BAP
+17.55%
6M
CFG
+19.73%
Winner
BAP
+37.63%
1Y
CFG
+69.21%
Winner
BAP
+83.22%
5Y(CAGR)
CFG
+12.96%
Winner
BAP
+32.87%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CFG
+17.81%
BAP
+14.85%
Max(CAGR)
CFG
+13.85%
Winner
BAP
+17.98%

CFG vs BAP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCFGBAP
2026+20.68%+39.09%
2025+39.15%+64.72%
2024+36.46%+32.49%
2023-11.29%+14.25%
2022-16.71%+12.39%
2021+37.87%-21.66%
2020-7.00%-20.35%
2019+38.20%-2.35%
2018-28.63%+5.74%
2017+19.13%+34.80%
2016+40.90%+69.45%
2015+7.46%-38.03%
2014+8.17%+24.00%
2013N/A-9.54%
2012N/A+36.81%
2011N/A-6.73%
2010N/A+56.14%
2009N/A+56.69%
2008N/A-32.22%
2007N/A+87.36%
2006N/A+75.55%
2005N/A+51.20%
2004N/A+21.81%
2003N/A+44.34%
2002N/A+10.25%
2001N/A+51.09%
2000N/A-48.50%
1999N/A+12.89%

CFG vs BAP Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CFG was -65.60%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 771 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for BAP was -64.93%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 440 trading sessions.

The current BAP drawdown is -1.67%.

RankCFGBAP
#1-65.60%
Jan 23, 2018 - Feb 16, 2021
-64.93%
Jun 16, 2008 - Mar 16, 2010
#2-56.14%
Jan 14, 2022 - Jul 17, 2025
-59.33%
Mar 18, 2019 - Nov 18, 2024
#3-35.12%
Jun 5, 2015 - Nov 9, 2016
-56.49%
Jan 14, 2000 - Nov 25, 2003
#4-18.80%
May 17, 2021 - Oct 20, 2021
-48.00%
Dec 3, 2014 - Jan 10, 2017
#5-18.32%
Feb 6, 2026 - Jun 12, 2026
-34.18%
Nov 8, 2010 - Mar 1, 2012
#6-18.25%
Mar 1, 2017 - Nov 29, 2017
-30.50%
Mar 28, 2013 - Nov 4, 2014
#7-12.83%
Nov 24, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022
-24.06%
Oct 4, 2005 - Feb 27, 2006
#8-10.39%
Oct 6, 2025 - Nov 25, 2025
-20.00%
Jan 7, 2004 - Oct 6, 2004
#9-10.00%
Dec 24, 2014 - Feb 13, 2015
-16.75%
Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 17, 2007
#10-8.93%
Feb 24, 2021 - Apr 28, 2021
-16.29%
Apr 5, 2012 - Nov 9, 2012
#11-7.00%
Oct 1, 2014 - Oct 29, 2014
-15.71%
Feb 3, 2026 - Jun 11, 2026
#12-6.44%
Oct 20, 2021 - Nov 23, 2021
-15.41%
Nov 8, 2006 - Feb 9, 2007
#13-6.42%
Dec 27, 2016 - Jan 25, 2017
-15.08%
Jul 23, 2007 - Sep 27, 2007
#14-6.25%
Mar 17, 2015 - Apr 23, 2015
-14.90%
Feb 27, 2006 - May 9, 2006
#15-5.67%
Jul 23, 2025 - Aug 22, 2025
-14.48%
Nov 21, 2024 - Apr 28, 2025

Correlation

Correlation between CFG and BAP is 0.80 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.80
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CFG vs BAP dividend yield comparison.

YearCFGBAP
20261.30%3.75%
20252.94%3.78%
20243.84%6.65%
20235.07%4.52%
20224.11%2.84%
20213.30%0.99%
20204.36%5.37%
20193.35%3.95%
20183.30%1.94%
20171.52%4.16%
20161.29%1.47%
20151.53%2.25%
20140.40%1.19%
20130.00%1.96%
20120.00%1.57%
20110.00%1.78%
20100.00%1.43%
20090.00%1.95%
20080.00%3.00%
20070.00%1.70%
20060.00%2.69%
20050.00%3.51%
20040.00%2.53%
20030.00%2.25%
20020.00%2.13%
20010.00%3.43%
20000.00%1.67%

Select Stocks to Compare