CET vs CLM

Comparison between Central Securities Corp (CET, ETF) and Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund (CLM, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceCET has outperformed CLM, delivering a return of +11.8% compared to +11.3%

CET vs CLM - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CET(ETF)	CLM(ETF)
Net Assets	$1.90B	$1.90B
Max Drawdown	73.29%	95.94%
Sharpe Ratio	1.20	0.73
5Y Beta	0.65	0.77
5Y Dividends CAGR	7.95%	-4.92%

Net Assets

CET

$1.90B

CLM

$1.90B

Max Drawdown

Winner

CET

73.29%

CLM

95.94%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

CET

1.20

CLM

0.73

5Y Beta

Winner

CET

0.65

CLM

0.77

5Y Dividends CAGR

Winner

CET

7.95%

CLM

-4.92%

CET vs CLM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CET	CLM
1 month	-0.31%	+2.44%
3 months	+5.79%	+7.35%
6 months	+5.26%	-0.00%
1 year	+18.07%	+15.09%
5 years(CAGR)	+11.81%	+11.33%
10 years(CAGR)	+16.47%	+12.45%
Max(CAGR)	+10.36%	+0.23%

CET

-0.31%

Winner

CLM

+2.44%

CET

+5.79%

Winner

CLM

+7.35%

Winner

CET

+5.26%

CLM

-0.00%

Winner

CET

+18.07%

CLM

+15.09%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

CET

+11.81%

CLM

+11.33%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

CET

+16.47%

CLM

+12.45%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

CET

+10.36%

CLM

+0.23%

CET vs CLM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CET	CLM
2026	+4.37%	-2.38%
2025	+18.04%	+18.73%
2024	+27.16%	+41.31%
2023	+18.42%	+14.34%
2022	-19.07%	-37.13%
2021	+51.39%	+42.02%
2020	+3.77%	+28.78%
2019	+37.54%	+21.98%
2018	-4.99%	-12.57%
2017	+30.57%	+22.45%
2016	+23.34%	+20.56%
2015	-3.98%	-1.81%
2014	+10.24%	-19.98%
2013	+26.91%	+12.00%
2012	+0.99%	-6.03%
2011	-2.98%	-23.00%
2010	+26.25%	-21.54%
2009	+24.89%	+51.00%
2008	-37.04%	-63.47%
2007	+10.42%	-40.20%
2006	+20.89%	+18.41%
2005	+14.55%	-17.38%
2004	+16.40%	-4.29%
2003	+34.25%	+53.19%
2002	-30.41%	-3.66%
2001	-1.71%	N/A
2000	+16.42%	N/A
1999	+12.25%	N/A

CET vs CLM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CET was -56.58%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 663 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CLM was -86.03%, occurring on Jan 20, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current CET drawdown is -2.08%. The current CLM drawdown is -34.16%.

Rank	CET	CLM
#1	-56.58% May 16, 2008 - Jan 3, 2011	-86.03% Feb 5, 2004 - Jan 20, 2016
#2	-50.75% Sep 1, 2000 - Dec 1, 2005	-19.67% Sep 6, 2002 - Jan 14, 2003
#3	-39.91% Jan 16, 2020 - Dec 7, 2020	-13.93% Jan 14, 2003 - May 12, 2003
#4	-24.88% Dec 30, 2021 - Mar 7, 2024	-6.56% Aug 2, 2002 - Aug 19, 2002
#5	-22.78% May 31, 2011 - Jul 15, 2013	-5.93% Aug 15, 2003 - Oct 3, 2003
#6	-18.50% Dec 23, 2014 - Jun 6, 2016	-4.47% Jul 1, 2003 - Jul 25, 2003
#7	-16.78% Aug 29, 2018 - Mar 14, 2019	-3.13% Jan 12, 2004 - Jan 23, 2004
#8	-15.46% Jul 17, 2007 - May 15, 2008	-3.07% Dec 3, 2003 - Dec 31, 2003
#9	-15.42% Feb 19, 2025 - Jul 2, 2025	-3.03% Jun 16, 2003 - Jun 30, 2003
#10	-14.88% Mar 28, 2000 - Jun 27, 2000	-2.93% Nov 10, 2003 - Nov 28, 2003
#11	-11.45% Jul 23, 2014 - Dec 23, 2014	-2.64% Jul 31, 2003 - Aug 11, 2003
#12	-9.96% Jan 17, 2018 - Jun 8, 2018	-2.45% Oct 9, 2003 - Oct 29, 2003
#13	-8.08% Mar 2, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026	-2.42% Aug 21, 2002 - Sep 6, 2002
#14	-7.69% Jan 27, 2006 - Oct 12, 2006	-2.16% Aug 11, 2003 - Aug 15, 2003
#15	-7.56% Jul 20, 2000 - Aug 18, 2000	-2.01% Jan 23, 2004 - Feb 5, 2004

Correlation

Correlation between CET and CLM is -0.03 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

-0.03

-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CET vs CLM dividend yield comparison.

Year	CET	CLM
2026	0.59%	9.75%
2025	5.32%	17.57%
2024	4.92%	15.41%
2023	4.90%	20.82%
2022	7.34%	29.91%
2021	8.41%	13.67%
2020	5.68%	19.26%
2019	3.78%	22.33%
2018	5.84%	25.79%
2017	3.65%	18.33%
2016	4.50%	22.80%
2015	10.41%	28.65%
2014	7.97%	5.84%
2013	17.03%	4.72%
2012	4.70%	5.63%
2011	4.89%	5.90%
2010	4.10%	4.82%
2009	3.62%	4.58%
2008	17.08%	3.47%
2007	8.94%	1.40%
2006	8.33%	0.78%
2005	8.40%	0.94%
2004	5.78%	0.78%
2003	6.70%	0.70%
2002	7.68%	0.45%
2001	7.11%	0.00%
2000	13.63%	0.00%
1999	8.81%	0.00%