CE vs TXNM
Comparison between Celanese Corp - Series A (CE, Company) and PNM Resources Inc (TXNM, Company).
CE is from the Basic Materials sector, while TXNM is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceTXNM has outperformed CE, delivering a return of +7.4% compared to -18.4%
CE vs TXNM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CE vs TXNM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CE vs TXNM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CE | TXNM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +32.35% | +2.09% |
| 2025 | -38.05% | +24.27% |
| 2024 | -54.38% | +30.79% |
| 2023 | +55.63% | -12.36% |
| 2022 | -37.55% | +10.63% |
| 2021 | +35.90% | -3.30% |
| 2020 | +9.77% | +0.29% |
| 2019 | +37.93% | +29.16% |
| 2018 | -14.05% | +5.73% |
| 2017 | +37.19% | +22.03% |
| 2016 | +21.58% | +16.88% |
| 2015 | +14.23% | +5.93% |
| 2014 | +10.81% | +28.48% |
| 2013 | +20.17% | +17.64% |
| 2012 | -2.50% | +19.98% |
| 2011 | +5.23% | +42.36% |
| 2010 | +24.49% | +6.80% |
| 2009 | +147.37% | +26.38% |
| 2008 | -70.95% | -49.82% |
| 2007 | +68.02% | -28.96% |
| 2006 | +32.00% | +28.66% |
| 2005 | +20.04% | +1.11% |
| 2004 | N/A | +37.21% |
| 2003 | N/A | +24.12% |
| 2002 | N/A | -14.30% |
| 2001 | N/A | +11.11% |
| 2000 | N/A | +78.91% |
| 1999 | N/A | -7.83% |
CE vs TXNM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CE was -84.87%, occurring on Mar 3, 2009. Recovery took 716 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for TXNM was -80.02%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 1724 trading sessions.
The current CE drawdown is -66.96%.
| Rank | CE | TXNM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -84.87% Jun 23, 2008 - Apr 26, 2011 | -80.02% Apr 25, 2007 - Feb 28, 2014 |
| #2 | -78.96% Mar 28, 2024 - Nov 20, 2025 | -51.04% May 10, 2001 - Sep 16, 2004 |
| #3 | -53.33% Nov 26, 2019 - Nov 9, 2020 | -46.35% Feb 18, 2020 - Nov 21, 2024 |
| #4 | -48.67% Jan 5, 2022 - Mar 20, 2024 | -25.17% Nov 30, 2017 - Dec 11, 2018 |
| #5 | -45.39% Jul 21, 2011 - Oct 21, 2013 | -22.79% Aug 3, 2005 - Nov 6, 2006 |
| #6 | -28.13% Jul 31, 2018 - Sep 5, 2019 | -20.57% Dec 29, 2014 - Dec 23, 2015 |
| #7 | -25.76% Jul 2, 2015 - Oct 27, 2016 | -17.98% Jul 1, 2014 - Nov 5, 2014 |
| #8 | -23.96% May 8, 2006 - Dec 5, 2006 | -16.85% Nov 8, 2000 - Mar 30, 2001 |
| #9 | -23.70% Dec 14, 2007 - Apr 21, 2008 | -14.91% Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 26, 2000 |
| #10 | -22.89% Jul 13, 2007 - Oct 29, 2007 | -14.22% Apr 28, 2000 - Jul 20, 2000 |
| #11 | -22.59% Jul 3, 2014 - Apr 17, 2015 | -13.00% Jul 6, 2016 - Feb 21, 2017 |
| #12 | -22.32% Apr 1, 2005 - Jul 20, 2005 | -10.60% Dec 13, 2018 - Feb 22, 2019 |
| #13 | -18.75% Aug 23, 2005 - Jan 17, 2006 | -10.22% Feb 21, 2025 - Mar 14, 2025 |
| #14 | -15.96% Nov 14, 2013 - Apr 21, 2014 | -10.07% Mar 19, 2025 - May 19, 2025 |
| #15 | -15.41% Nov 6, 2007 - Dec 12, 2007 | -9.86% Oct 4, 2019 - Jan 23, 2020 |
Correlation
Correlation between CE and TXNM is 0.72 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CE vs TXNM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CE | TXNM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.11% | 1.42% |
| 2025 | 0.28% | 2.77% |
| 2024 | 4.05% | 3.15% |
| 2023 | 1.80% | 3.53% |
| 2022 | 2.68% | 2.85% |
| 2021 | 1.62% | 2.87% |
| 2020 | 1.91% | 2.53% |
| 2019 | 1.95% | 2.29% |
| 2018 | 2.31% | 2.58% |
| 2017 | 1.62% | 2.40% |
| 2016 | 1.75% | 2.57% |
| 2015 | 1.71% | 2.62% |
| 2014 | 1.55% | 2.50% |
| 2013 | 0.95% | 2.65% |
| 2012 | 0.61% | 3.44% |
| 2011 | 0.50% | 2.74% |
| 2010 | 0.44% | 3.84% |
| 2009 | 0.50% | 3.95% |
| 2008 | 1.29% | 7.04% |
| 2007 | 0.38% | 4.24% |
| 2006 | 0.62% | 2.77% |
| 2005 | 0.42% | 3.14% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 2.50% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 3.24% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 3.61% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.86% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 2.98% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks