CE vs RUSHB
Comparison between Celanese Corp - Series A (CE, Company) and Rush Enterprises Inc - Class B (RUSHB, Company).
CE is from the Basic Materials sector, while RUSHB is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.
5-Year PerformanceRUSHB has outperformed CE, delivering a return of +25.0% compared to -17.7%
CE vs RUSHB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CE vs RUSHB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CE vs RUSHB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CE | RUSHB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +21.47% | +31.82% |
| 2025 | -38.05% | +5.88% |
| 2024 | -54.38% | +6.11% |
| 2023 | +55.63% | +46.37% |
| 2022 | -37.55% | +6.09% |
| 2021 | +35.90% | +49.29% |
| 2020 | +9.77% | +26.75% |
| 2019 | +37.93% | +25.96% |
| 2018 | -14.05% | -24.56% |
| 2017 | +37.19% | +57.91% |
| 2016 | +21.58% | +43.11% |
| 2015 | +14.23% | -22.56% |
| 2014 | +10.81% | +15.36% |
| 2013 | +20.17% | +43.26% |
| 2012 | -2.50% | +0.29% |
| 2011 | +5.23% | -6.23% |
| 2010 | +24.49% | +69.04% |
| 2009 | +147.37% | +17.04% |
| 2008 | -70.95% | -53.36% |
| 2007 | +68.02% | +63.80% |
| 2006 | +32.00% | +9.58% |
| 2005 | +20.04% | -14.34% |
| 2004 | N/A | +74.14% |
| 2003 | N/A | +191.08% |
| 2002 | N/A | -5.84% |
| 2001 | N/A | +86.40% |
| 2000 | N/A | -75.23% |
| 1999 | N/A | -4.92% |
CE vs RUSHB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CE was -84.87%, occurring on Mar 3, 2009. Recovery took 716 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for RUSHB was -77.95%, occurring on Dec 7, 2000. Recovery took 983 trading sessions.
The current CE drawdown is -69.67%. The current RUSHB drawdown is -7.80%.
| Rank | CE | RUSHB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -84.87% Jun 23, 2008 - Apr 26, 2011 | -77.95% Nov 24, 1999 - Oct 24, 2003 |
| #2 | -78.96% Mar 28, 2024 - Nov 20, 2025 | -70.15% Jul 23, 2007 - Dec 3, 2010 |
| #3 | -53.33% Nov 26, 2019 - Nov 9, 2020 | -58.02% Jan 26, 2018 - Oct 23, 2020 |
| #4 | -48.67% Jan 5, 2022 - Mar 20, 2024 | -54.25% Sep 2, 2014 - Feb 21, 2017 |
| #5 | -45.39% Jul 21, 2011 - Oct 21, 2013 | -45.52% Dec 7, 2010 - Feb 9, 2012 |
| #6 | -28.13% Jul 31, 2018 - Sep 5, 2019 | -43.52% Feb 16, 2012 - Feb 15, 2013 |
| #7 | -25.76% Jul 2, 2015 - Oct 27, 2016 | -28.48% Mar 28, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024 |
| #8 | -23.96% May 8, 2006 - Dec 5, 2006 | -26.03% Dec 28, 2004 - Mar 13, 2006 |
| #9 | -23.70% Dec 14, 2007 - Apr 21, 2008 | -24.21% Apr 19, 2006 - Feb 14, 2007 |
| #10 | -22.89% Jul 13, 2007 - Oct 29, 2007 | -23.72% Nov 3, 2003 - Jan 7, 2004 |
| #11 | -22.59% Jul 3, 2014 - Apr 17, 2015 | -22.93% Jan 6, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 |
| #12 | -22.32% Apr 1, 2005 - Jul 20, 2005 | -22.83% Mar 19, 2021 - Sep 29, 2021 |
| #13 | -18.75% Aug 23, 2005 - Jan 17, 2006 | -21.02% Aug 16, 2022 - Feb 1, 2023 |
| #14 | -15.96% Nov 14, 2013 - Apr 21, 2014 | -19.59% Sep 18, 2025 - Dec 10, 2025 |
| #15 | -15.41% Nov 6, 2007 - Dec 12, 2007 | -18.72% Jul 30, 2004 - Oct 20, 2004 |
Correlation
Correlation between CE and RUSHB is 0.58 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2002 - 2026)
CE vs RUSHB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CE | RUSHB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.12% | 0.53% |
| 2025 | 0.28% | 1.32% |
| 2024 | 4.05% | 1.29% |
| 2023 | 1.80% | 1.17% |
| 2022 | 2.68% | 1.42% |
| 2021 | 1.62% | 1.37% |
| 2020 | 1.91% | 1.07% |
| 2019 | 1.95% | 1.09% |
| 2018 | 2.31% | 0.67% |
| 2017 | 1.62% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 1.75% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 1.71% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 1.55% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 0.95% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 0.61% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 0.50% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 0.50% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.29% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 0.38% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 0.62% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 143.84% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks