CE vs PAGP
Comparison between Celanese Corp - Series A (CE, Company) and Plains GP Holdings LP - Class A (PAGP, Company).
CE is from the Basic Materials sector, while PAGP is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformancePAGP has outperformed CE, delivering a return of +22.6% compared to -18.4%
CE vs PAGP - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CE vs PAGP - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CE vs PAGP - Annual Returns (2005 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CE | PAGP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +26.92% | +30.41% |
| 2025 | -38.05% | +11.94% |
| 2024 | -54.38% | +22.50% |
| 2023 | +55.63% | +40.95% |
| 2022 | -37.55% | +25.85% |
| 2021 | +35.90% | +27.99% |
| 2020 | +9.77% | -51.69% |
| 2019 | +37.93% | -2.39% |
| 2018 | -14.05% | -5.84% |
| 2017 | +37.19% | -32.75% |
| 2016 | +21.58% | +49.79% |
| 2015 | +14.23% | -62.14% |
| 2014 | +10.81% | +0.40% |
| 2013 | +20.17% | +21.68% |
| 2012 | -2.50% | N/A |
| 2011 | +5.23% | N/A |
| 2010 | +24.49% | N/A |
| 2009 | +147.37% | N/A |
| 2008 | -70.95% | N/A |
| 2007 | +68.02% | N/A |
| 2006 | +32.00% | N/A |
| 2005 | +20.04% | N/A |
CE vs PAGP Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CE was -84.87%, occurring on Mar 3, 2009. Recovery took 716 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for PAGP was -94.21%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CE drawdown is -68.31%. The current PAGP drawdown is -34.94%.
| Rank | CE | PAGP |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -84.87% Jun 23, 2008 - Apr 26, 2011 | -94.21% Jun 30, 2014 - Mar 18, 2020 |
| #2 | -78.96% Mar 28, 2024 - Nov 20, 2025 | -7.28% Dec 31, 2013 - Feb 10, 2014 |
| #3 | -53.33% Nov 26, 2019 - Nov 9, 2020 | -5.57% Apr 3, 2014 - May 7, 2014 |
| #4 | -48.67% Jan 5, 2022 - Mar 20, 2024 | -5.21% May 7, 2014 - Jun 9, 2014 |
| #5 | -45.39% Jul 21, 2011 - Oct 21, 2013 | -4.89% Feb 19, 2014 - Mar 21, 2014 |
| #6 | -28.13% Jul 31, 2018 - Sep 5, 2019 | -4.51% Nov 8, 2013 - Nov 27, 2013 |
| #7 | -25.76% Jul 2, 2015 - Oct 27, 2016 | -3.71% Mar 25, 2014 - Apr 3, 2014 |
| #8 | -23.96% May 8, 2006 - Dec 5, 2006 | -3.14% Jun 9, 2014 - Jun 20, 2014 |
| #9 | -23.70% Dec 14, 2007 - Apr 21, 2008 | -2.45% Oct 17, 2013 - Oct 24, 2013 |
| #10 | -22.89% Jul 13, 2007 - Oct 29, 2007 | -2.28% Oct 25, 2013 - Nov 4, 2013 |
| #11 | -22.59% Jul 3, 2014 - Apr 17, 2015 | -2.00% Dec 13, 2013 - Dec 18, 2013 |
| #12 | -22.32% Apr 1, 2005 - Jul 20, 2005 | -1.63% Jun 23, 2014 - Jun 26, 2014 |
| #13 | -18.75% Aug 23, 2005 - Jan 17, 2006 | -1.12% Feb 11, 2014 - Feb 18, 2014 |
| #14 | -15.96% Nov 14, 2013 - Apr 21, 2014 | -1.08% Nov 4, 2013 - Nov 7, 2013 |
| #15 | -15.41% Nov 6, 2007 - Dec 12, 2007 | -0.16% Dec 9, 2013 - Dec 13, 2013 |
Correlation
Correlation between CE and PAGP is -0.62 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2005 - 2026)
CE vs PAGP dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CE | PAGP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.11% | 3.42% |
| 2025 | 0.28% | 7.94% |
| 2024 | 4.05% | 6.91% |
| 2023 | 1.80% | 6.71% |
| 2022 | 2.68% | 6.69% |
| 2021 | 1.62% | 7.10% |
| 2020 | 1.91% | 10.65% |
| 2019 | 1.95% | 7.28% |
| 2018 | 2.31% | 5.97% |
| 2017 | 1.62% | 8.88% |
| 2016 | 1.75% | 6.91% |
| 2015 | 1.71% | 9.34% |
| 2014 | 1.55% | 2.61% |
| 2013 | 0.95% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 0.61% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 0.50% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 0.50% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.29% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 0.38% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 0.62% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 0.42% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks