CDR-P-B vs SILC
Comparison between Cedar Realty Trust Inc (CDR-P-B, Company) and Silicom Ltd (SILC, Company).
5-Year PerformanceCDR-P-B has outperformed SILC, delivering a return of +6.0% compared to +0.5%
CDR-P-B vs SILC - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CDR-P-B vs SILC - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CDR-P-B vs SILC - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CDR-P-B | SILC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +12.65% | +230.37% |
| 2025 | +27.90% | -4.36% |
| 2024 | +30.88% | -10.92% |
| 2023 | +2.62% | -57.52% |
| 2022 | -35.98% | -16.10% |
| 2021 | +26.20% | +24.34% |
| 2020 | -6.75% | +25.22% |
| 2019 | +17.44% | -7.17% |
| 2018 | -1.71% | -53.14% |
| 2017 | +11.30% | +77.11% |
| 2016 | +4.50% | +32.00% |
| 2015 | +1.97% | -9.51% |
| 2014 | +22.28% | -21.09% |
| 2013 | +1.86% | +155.86% |
| 2012 | +9.28% | -0.72% |
| 2011 | N/A | -7.10% |
| 2010 | N/A | +115.87% |
| 2009 | N/A | +84.00% |
| 2008 | N/A | -70.67% |
| 2007 | N/A | +58.93% |
| 2006 | N/A | +10.62% |
| 2005 | N/A | +215.33% |
| 2004 | N/A | +62.87% |
| 2003 | N/A | +381.82% |
| 2002 | N/A | -65.12% |
| 2001 | N/A | -73.10% |
| 2000 | N/A | -30.60% |
| 1999 | N/A | +106.31% |
CDR-P-B vs SILC Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CDR-P-B was -70.52%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 229 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for SILC was -98.80%, occurring on Jan 8, 2003. Recovery took 1789 trading sessions.
The current CDR-P-B drawdown is -11.44%. The current SILC drawdown is -38.87%.
| Rank | CDR-P-B | SILC |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -70.52% Feb 11, 2020 - Jan 7, 2021 | -98.80% Mar 1, 2000 - Apr 16, 2007 |
| #2 | -70.38% Feb 28, 2022 - Feb 11, 2025 | -88.41% Sep 12, 2007 - Mar 8, 2013 |
| #3 | -16.68% Feb 11, 2025 - Aug 22, 2025 | -84.76% Jan 3, 2018 - Aug 5, 2024 |
| #4 | -15.10% May 8, 2013 - Apr 23, 2014 | -64.18% Mar 4, 2014 - Oct 19, 2017 |
| #5 | -12.61% May 7, 2026 - Jun 16, 2026 | -42.41% Dec 8, 1999 - Jan 18, 2000 |
| #6 | -10.93% Jan 19, 2018 - Jul 13, 2018 | -34.94% Nov 26, 1999 - Nov 30, 1999 |
| #7 | -8.80% Aug 21, 2018 - Jan 30, 2019 | -30.64% Nov 30, 1999 - Dec 8, 1999 |
| #8 | -8.20% Aug 9, 2016 - Apr 10, 2017 | -29.52% Apr 24, 2007 - Sep 5, 2007 |
| #9 | -7.89% Jan 30, 2019 - Mar 11, 2019 | -27.29% Jul 16, 2013 - Oct 21, 2013 |
| #10 | -7.62% Mar 31, 2026 - May 1, 2026 | -23.20% Jan 19, 2000 - Feb 7, 2000 |
| #11 | -6.83% Jul 1, 2015 - Nov 5, 2015 | -17.19% Nov 5, 1999 - Nov 16, 1999 |
| #12 | -6.02% Mar 6, 2026 - Mar 18, 2026 | -16.41% Feb 15, 2000 - Mar 1, 2000 |
| #13 | -5.82% Dec 17, 2025 - Feb 9, 2026 | -10.52% Nov 21, 2017 - Jan 3, 2018 |
| #14 | -5.61% Nov 5, 2015 - Feb 19, 2016 | -10.05% Apr 2, 2013 - Apr 23, 2013 |
| #15 | -5.42% Nov 11, 2025 - Dec 17, 2025 | -9.17% Nov 12, 2013 - Dec 27, 2013 |
Correlation
Correlation between CDR-P-B and SILC is -0.08 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2012 - 2026)
CDR-P-B vs SILC dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CDR-P-B | SILC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.65% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 10.16% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 12.08% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 14.02% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 12.49% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 7.02% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 8.38% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 7.23% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 7.86% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 7.17% | 1.43% |
| 2016 | 7.44% | 2.43% |
| 2015 | 7.34% | 3.30% |
| 2014 | 6.90% | 2.84% |
| 2013 | 7.88% | 1.20% |
| 2012 | 3.71% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks