CCL vs TRI
Comparison between Carnival Corporation Ltd (Paired Stock) (CCL, Company) and Thomson-Reuters Corp (TRI, Company).
CCL is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while TRI is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceCCL has outperformed TRI, delivering a return of -0.3% compared to -2.0%
CCL vs TRI - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CCL vs TRI - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CCL vs TRI - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CCL | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -4.68% | -34.61% |
| 2025 | +22.11% | -17.06% |
| 2024 | +44.13% | +12.82% |
| 2023 | +132.62% | +28.64% |
| 2022 | -62.35% | -0.97% |
| 2021 | -1.28% | +51.02% |
| 2020 | -57.29% | +15.80% |
| 2019 | +6.21% | +53.97% |
| 2018 | -23.83% | +14.09% |
| 2017 | +30.56% | +2.50% |
| 2016 | -1.26% | +22.07% |
| 2015 | +22.18% | -2.07% |
| 2014 | +16.78% | +13.45% |
| 2013 | +10.20% | +33.37% |
| 2012 | +16.49% | +12.37% |
| 2011 | -28.34% | -27.57% |
| 2010 | +45.42% | +17.92% |
| 2009 | +24.03% | +16.31% |
| 2008 | -41.13% | -26.04% |
| 2007 | -10.04% | -0.57% |
| 2006 | -8.04% | +22.33% |
| 2005 | -5.27% | +0.75% |
| 2004 | +46.41% | -2.37% |
| 2003 | +57.36% | +37.12% |
| 2002 | -6.86% | -12.38% |
| 2001 | +0.63% | N/A |
| 2000 | -33.11% | N/A |
| 1999 | +9.37% | N/A |
CCL vs TRI Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CCL was -90.36%, occurring on Oct 10, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for TRI was -62.55%, occurring on May 14, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CCL drawdown is -55.47%. The current TRI drawdown is -61.13%.
| Rank | CCL | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -90.36% Jan 29, 2018 - Oct 10, 2022 | -62.55% Jul 14, 2025 - May 14, 2026 |
| #2 | -71.08% Dec 28, 2004 - Dec 24, 2014 | -56.41% Oct 31, 2007 - Nov 6, 2013 |
| #3 | -63.29% Jan 14, 2000 - Jun 23, 2004 | -35.36% Feb 19, 2020 - Oct 5, 2020 |
| #4 | -23.98% Dec 29, 2015 - Jan 5, 2017 | -26.73% Jun 28, 2002 - May 20, 2003 |
| #5 | -13.11% Dec 6, 1999 - Jan 14, 2000 | -24.61% Nov 19, 2021 - Feb 13, 2023 |
| #6 | -12.28% Jul 31, 2015 - Oct 23, 2015 | -20.38% Oct 17, 2017 - Oct 3, 2018 |
| #7 | -11.54% Nov 16, 1999 - Dec 6, 1999 | -18.30% Jan 2, 2004 - Nov 16, 2004 |
| #8 | -10.90% Apr 7, 2015 - Jun 18, 2015 | -17.36% Oct 22, 2015 - Apr 26, 2016 |
| #9 | -10.17% Jul 1, 2004 - Sep 16, 2004 | -14.34% Jun 27, 2023 - Nov 17, 2023 |
| #10 | -8.79% Jan 26, 2015 - Mar 18, 2015 | -13.21% Feb 17, 2005 - Aug 10, 2005 |
| #11 | -8.61% Aug 31, 2017 - Jan 12, 2018 | -11.96% May 24, 2024 - Feb 6, 2025 |
| #12 | -8.28% Oct 29, 2015 - Dec 21, 2015 | -11.63% Nov 14, 2013 - Jul 9, 2014 |
| #13 | -5.49% May 9, 2017 - May 26, 2017 | -11.24% Sep 19, 2005 - Feb 15, 2006 |
| #14 | -5.29% Mar 20, 2015 - Mar 27, 2015 | -11.20% Apr 15, 2015 - Oct 12, 2015 |
| #15 | -5.22% Nov 12, 2004 - Dec 1, 2004 | -10.65% Jul 17, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between CCL and TRI is -0.32 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CCL vs TRI dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CCL | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.03% | 3.39% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 1.80% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 1.35% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 4.68% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 1.56% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 1.76% |
| 2020 | 2.31% | 1.86% |
| 2019 | 3.93% | 2.01% |
| 2018 | 3.96% | 2.87% |
| 2017 | 2.41% | 3.17% |
| 2016 | 2.59% | 3.11% |
| 2015 | 2.02% | 3.54% |
| 2014 | 2.21% | 4.51% |
| 2013 | 2.49% | 3.44% |
| 2012 | 4.08% | 4.41% |
| 2011 | 3.06% | 4.65% |
| 2010 | 0.87% | 3.11% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 3.47% |
| 2008 | 6.58% | 2.77% |
| 2007 | 3.09% | 1.80% |
| 2006 | 2.09% | 2.12% |
| 2005 | 1.50% | 2.28% |
| 2004 | 0.91% | 2.14% |
| 2003 | 1.11% | 3.18% |
| 2002 | 3.42% | 1.33% |
| 2001 | 1.50% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 1.36% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.22% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks