CBT vs SLGN
Comparison between Cabot Corp (CBT, Company) and Silgan Holdings Inc (SLGN, Company).
CBT is from the Basic Materials sector, while SLGN is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.
5-Year PerformanceCBT has outperformed SLGN, delivering a return of +6.8% compared to -1.0%
CBT vs SLGN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CBT vs SLGN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CBT vs SLGN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CBT | SLGN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +17.50% | -7.44% |
| 2025 | -23.64% | -19.56% |
| 2024 | +11.95% | +16.57% |
| 2023 | +29.88% | -11.29% |
| 2022 | +19.42% | +24.10% |
| 2021 | +29.84% | +18.58% |
| 2020 | -1.21% | +22.38% |
| 2019 | +12.87% | +36.97% |
| 2018 | -29.79% | -18.97% |
| 2017 | +22.60% | +15.47% |
| 2016 | +28.38% | -2.80% |
| 2015 | -4.62% | +0.81% |
| 2014 | -12.89% | +13.98% |
| 2013 | +28.23% | +13.49% |
| 2012 | +22.28% | +8.44% |
| 2011 | -16.15% | +8.86% |
| 2010 | +40.46% | +28.17% |
| 2009 | +75.01% | +23.04% |
| 2008 | -51.14% | -3.65% |
| 2007 | -23.24% | +21.52% |
| 2006 | +19.53% | +20.29% |
| 2005 | -4.60% | +19.68% |
| 2004 | +24.28% | +46.52% |
| 2003 | +21.34% | +63.77% |
| 2002 | -22.76% | -1.59% |
| 2001 | +44.00% | +190.67% |
| 2000 | +129.99% | -30.12% |
| 1999 | +9.32% | -11.16% |
CBT vs SLGN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CBT was -82.88%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 951 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for SLGN was -66.17%, occurring on Dec 20, 2000. Recovery took 309 trading sessions.
The current CBT drawdown is -30.78%. The current SLGN drawdown is -32.27%.
| Rank | CBT | SLGN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -82.88% Apr 25, 2007 - Feb 1, 2011 | -66.17% Feb 18, 2000 - May 11, 2001 |
| #2 | -67.20% Jan 26, 2018 - May 6, 2021 | -57.02% May 13, 2002 - Dec 23, 2003 |
| #3 | -52.51% Oct 23, 2001 - Jun 23, 2004 | -34.76% Aug 13, 2001 - Dec 31, 2001 |
| #4 | -50.85% Apr 5, 2011 - Oct 21, 2013 | -34.69% Nov 29, 2024 - May 15, 2026 |
| #5 | -48.79% Nov 6, 2024 - Nov 20, 2025 | -32.84% Nov 18, 1999 - Feb 18, 2000 |
| #6 | -47.44% Jun 17, 2014 - Feb 2, 2017 | -32.81% Jul 17, 2007 - Mar 17, 2010 |
| #7 | -30.64% Jun 30, 2004 - Oct 16, 2006 | -29.53% Jun 1, 2017 - Jul 3, 2019 |
| #8 | -25.32% Jun 4, 2021 - Feb 8, 2022 | -28.81% Feb 2, 2023 - Nov 6, 2024 |
| #9 | -24.00% Feb 15, 2001 - Aug 13, 2001 | -26.46% Apr 20, 2011 - Mar 11, 2013 |
| #10 | -23.16% Mar 3, 2023 - Dec 18, 2023 | -26.33% May 30, 2001 - Jul 24, 2001 |
| #11 | -23.03% Aug 22, 2000 - Nov 1, 2000 | -21.91% Feb 18, 2020 - Apr 16, 2020 |
| #12 | -22.39% Jun 6, 2022 - Aug 16, 2022 | -20.36% Mar 17, 2005 - Sep 8, 2005 |
| #13 | -19.79% Aug 16, 2022 - Feb 13, 2023 | -18.20% Dec 31, 2001 - Jan 31, 2002 |
| #14 | -17.84% Mar 31, 2000 - Jul 6, 2000 | -17.59% Apr 6, 2015 - Jan 24, 2017 |
| #15 | -17.55% Dec 26, 2023 - Mar 4, 2024 | -16.94% Mar 17, 2006 - Oct 19, 2006 |
Correlation
Correlation between CBT and SLGN is 0.92 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CBT vs SLGN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CBT | SLGN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.57% | 0.55% |
| 2025 | 2.69% | 1.98% |
| 2024 | 1.85% | 1.46% |
| 2023 | 1.88% | 1.59% |
| 2022 | 2.21% | 1.23% |
| 2021 | 2.53% | 1.31% |
| 2020 | 3.12% | 1.29% |
| 2019 | 2.90% | 1.42% |
| 2018 | 3.04% | 1.69% |
| 2017 | 2.02% | 1.22% |
| 2016 | 2.22% | 1.33% |
| 2015 | 2.15% | 1.19% |
| 2014 | 1.96% | 1.12% |
| 2013 | 1.56% | 1.17% |
| 2012 | 1.96% | 1.16% |
| 2011 | 2.24% | 1.14% |
| 2010 | 1.91% | 1.17% |
| 2009 | 2.74% | 1.31% |
| 2008 | 4.71% | 1.42% |
| 2007 | 2.16% | 1.23% |
| 2006 | 1.51% | 1.09% |
| 2005 | 1.79% | 1.11% |
| 2004 | 1.58% | 0.74% |
| 2003 | 1.76% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.96% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 1.40% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 52.69% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.54% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks