CBT vs MAT
Comparison between Cabot Corp (CBT, Company) and Mattel Inc (MAT, Company).
CBT is from the Basic Materials sector, while MAT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.
5-Year PerformanceCBT has outperformed MAT, delivering a return of +6.8% compared to -7.4%
CBT vs MAT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CBT vs MAT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CBT vs MAT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CBT | MAT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +21.98% | -29.74% |
| 2025 | -23.64% | +11.90% |
| 2024 | +11.95% | -5.54% |
| 2023 | +29.88% | +5.53% |
| 2022 | +19.42% | -17.94% |
| 2021 | +29.84% | +24.99% |
| 2020 | -1.21% | +31.20% |
| 2019 | +12.87% | +38.83% |
| 2018 | -29.79% | -37.64% |
| 2017 | +22.60% | -43.75% |
| 2016 | +28.38% | +5.43% |
| 2015 | -4.62% | -5.11% |
| 2014 | -12.89% | -31.80% |
| 2013 | +28.23% | +33.63% |
| 2012 | +22.28% | +36.87% |
| 2011 | -16.15% | +11.49% |
| 2010 | +40.46% | +31.33% |
| 2009 | +75.01% | +24.52% |
| 2008 | -51.14% | -8.70% |
| 2007 | -23.24% | -14.30% |
| 2006 | +19.53% | +50.52% |
| 2005 | -4.60% | -15.00% |
| 2004 | +24.28% | +3.38% |
| 2003 | +21.34% | -1.19% |
| 2002 | -22.76% | +14.27% |
| 2001 | +44.00% | +25.88% |
| 2000 | +129.99% | +13.40% |
| 1999 | +9.32% | -2.57% |
CBT vs MAT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CBT was -82.88%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 951 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for MAT was -81.63%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CBT drawdown is -28.14%. The current MAT drawdown is -64.22%.
| Rank | CBT | MAT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -82.88% Apr 25, 2007 - Feb 1, 2011 | -81.63% Dec 30, 2013 - Mar 23, 2020 |
| #2 | -67.20% Jan 26, 2018 - May 6, 2021 | -61.36% Apr 5, 2007 - Dec 1, 2010 |
| #3 | -52.51% Oct 23, 2001 - Jun 23, 2004 | -38.85% Nov 26, 1999 - Jun 8, 2000 |
| #4 | -50.85% Apr 5, 2011 - Oct 21, 2013 | -34.16% Mar 21, 2003 - Oct 17, 2006 |
| #5 | -48.79% Nov 6, 2024 - Nov 20, 2025 | -33.60% Jun 8, 2000 - Jan 4, 2001 |
| #6 | -47.44% Jun 17, 2014 - Feb 2, 2017 | -29.05% Jun 21, 2002 - Mar 20, 2003 |
| #7 | -30.64% Jun 30, 2004 - Oct 16, 2006 | -19.93% Jul 17, 2001 - Oct 25, 2001 |
| #8 | -25.32% Jun 4, 2021 - Feb 8, 2022 | -18.07% Jul 7, 2011 - Oct 10, 2011 |
| #9 | -24.00% Feb 15, 2001 - Aug 13, 2001 | -17.87% Mar 21, 2001 - Jun 29, 2001 |
| #10 | -23.16% Mar 3, 2023 - Dec 18, 2023 | -14.71% Nov 15, 2001 - Mar 15, 2002 |
| #11 | -23.03% Aug 22, 2000 - Nov 1, 2000 | -13.46% Jul 12, 2013 - Dec 26, 2013 |
| #12 | -22.39% Jun 6, 2022 - Aug 16, 2022 | -10.37% Dec 22, 2010 - Apr 15, 2011 |
| #13 | -19.79% Aug 16, 2022 - Feb 13, 2023 | -10.24% Mar 26, 2012 - Jul 17, 2012 |
| #14 | -17.84% Mar 31, 2000 - Jul 6, 2000 | -7.25% Apr 25, 2002 - Jun 10, 2002 |
| #15 | -17.55% Dec 26, 2023 - Mar 4, 2024 | -7.11% Oct 18, 2012 - Nov 30, 2012 |
Correlation
Correlation between CBT and MAT is 0.36 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CBT vs MAT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CBT | MAT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.14% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 2.69% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 1.85% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 1.88% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 2.21% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 2.53% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 3.12% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 2.90% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 3.04% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 2.02% | 5.92% |
| 2016 | 2.22% | 5.52% |
| 2015 | 2.15% | 5.59% |
| 2014 | 1.96% | 4.91% |
| 2013 | 1.56% | 3.03% |
| 2012 | 1.96% | 3.39% |
| 2011 | 2.24% | 3.31% |
| 2010 | 1.91% | 3.26% |
| 2009 | 2.74% | 3.75% |
| 2008 | 4.71% | 4.69% |
| 2007 | 2.16% | 3.94% |
| 2006 | 1.51% | 2.87% |
| 2005 | 1.79% | 3.16% |
| 2004 | 1.58% | 2.31% |
| 2003 | 1.76% | 2.08% |
| 2002 | 1.96% | 0.26% |
| 2001 | 1.40% | 0.29% |
| 2000 | 52.69% | 1.87% |
| 1999 | 0.54% | 0.69% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks