CATO vs BGSF
Comparison between Cato Corp - Class A (CATO, Company) and BGSF Inc (BGSF, Company).
CATO is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while BGSF is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceBGSF has outperformed CATO, delivering a return of -5.6% compared to -22.9%
CATO vs BGSF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CATO vs BGSF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CATO vs BGSF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CATO | BGSF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +9.83% | +17.99% |
| 2025 | -18.04% | +11.85% |
| 2024 | -41.14% | -43.43% |
| 2023 | -18.80% | -35.13% |
| 2022 | -42.92% | +12.42% |
| 2021 | +94.36% | +14.32% |
| 2020 | -42.91% | -35.79% |
| 2019 | +32.83% | +11.89% |
| 2018 | -4.82% | +35.17% |
| 2017 | -43.12% | +11.15% |
| 2016 | -14.78% | +17.59% |
| 2015 | -9.45% | +22.17% |
| 2014 | +37.62% | +88.07% |
| 2013 | +18.66% | N/A |
| 2012 | +24.43% | N/A |
| 2011 | -10.07% | N/A |
| 2010 | +39.85% | N/A |
| 2009 | +39.53% | N/A |
| 2008 | +2.72% | N/A |
| 2007 | -30.49% | N/A |
| 2006 | +9.98% | N/A |
| 2005 | +14.74% | N/A |
| 2004 | +46.58% | N/A |
| 2003 | -1.81% | N/A |
| 2002 | +7.72% | N/A |
| 2001 | +42.52% | N/A |
| 2000 | +20.00% | N/A |
| 1999 | +2.34% | N/A |
CATO vs BGSF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CATO was -90.64%, occurring on Apr 14, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for BGSF was -87.05%, occurring on Apr 10, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CATO drawdown is -86.41%. The current BGSF drawdown is -65.29%.
| Rank | CATO | BGSF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -90.64% Feb 23, 2015 - Apr 14, 2025 | -87.05% Aug 17, 2018 - Apr 10, 2025 |
| #2 | -50.73% Jun 29, 2006 - Apr 8, 2010 | -42.47% Jul 26, 2016 - Mar 29, 2018 |
| #3 | -47.61% May 16, 2002 - Nov 9, 2004 | -19.08% May 24, 2016 - Jun 28, 2016 |
| #4 | -34.13% May 22, 2001 - Mar 14, 2002 | -18.46% Oct 2, 2015 - Nov 3, 2015 |
| #5 | -27.94% Nov 29, 1999 - Sep 28, 2000 | -17.72% Dec 31, 2015 - Apr 5, 2016 |
| #6 | -27.79% Jul 6, 2011 - Jun 6, 2012 | -15.38% May 9, 2018 - Jun 25, 2018 |
| #7 | -25.36% Feb 13, 2001 - May 16, 2001 | -14.96% Dec 31, 2014 - Aug 7, 2015 |
| #8 | -23.93% Nov 21, 2013 - Aug 19, 2014 | -11.25% Aug 14, 2014 - Aug 28, 2014 |
| #9 | -23.79% Sep 6, 2012 - Oct 18, 2013 | -7.79% Jul 26, 2018 - Aug 3, 2018 |
| #10 | -23.03% Mar 17, 2005 - Nov 4, 2005 | -7.68% Apr 16, 2018 - May 2, 2018 |
| #11 | -21.09% Dec 7, 2010 - Jun 20, 2011 | -6.01% Aug 17, 2015 - Oct 1, 2015 |
| #12 | -19.23% Sep 28, 2000 - Nov 27, 2000 | -5.27% Jun 17, 2014 - Aug 14, 2014 |
| #13 | -15.91% Dec 14, 2005 - Mar 31, 2006 | -4.96% May 9, 2016 - May 20, 2016 |
| #14 | -14.10% May 12, 2010 - Sep 13, 2010 | -4.60% May 13, 2014 - Jun 17, 2014 |
| #15 | -13.28% Jul 3, 2012 - Sep 6, 2012 | -4.55% Dec 16, 2015 - Dec 30, 2015 |
Correlation
Correlation between CATO and BGSF is 0.14 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2025)
CATO vs BGSF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CATO | BGSF |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00% | 43.20% |
| 2024 | 13.08% | 2.86% |
| 2023 | 9.52% | 6.38% |
| 2022 | 7.29% | 3.92% |
| 2021 | 2.62% | 3.07% |
| 2020 | 3.44% | 3.71% |
| 2019 | 7.59% | 5.48% |
| 2018 | 9.25% | 5.57% |
| 2017 | 8.29% | 6.27% |
| 2016 | 4.29% | 6.41% |
| 2015 | 3.26% | 5.02% |
| 2014 | 2.84% | 1.15% |
| 2013 | 0.63% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 9.95% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 3.62% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 2.63% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 3.29% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 4.37% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 4.12% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 2.53% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 2.36% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 2.38% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 3.07% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 2.71% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 2.09% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 3.09% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.75% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks