StockComparison Logo
vs

CAH vs FITB

Comparison between Cardinal Health Inc (CAH, Company) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB, Company).

CAH is from the Healthcare sector, while FITB is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceCAH has outperformed FITB, delivering a return of +33.6% compared to +14.0%

CAH vs FITB - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
CAH
$52B
Winner
FITB
$52B
Max Drawdown
Winner
CAH
67.57%
FITB
98.52%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CAH
1.26
FITB
1.23
5Y Beta
Winner
CAH
0.27
FITB
0.96
Industry
CAH
Medical Distribution
FITB
Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio
CAH
28.97
Winner
FITB
26.22
Forward P/E
CAH
19.12
Winner
FITB
14.03
PEG Ratio
Winner
CAH
0.36
FITB
2.09
Dividend Yield
CAH
0.90%
Winner
FITB
2.77%
5Y Dividends CAGR
CAH
5.60%
Winner
FITB
12.77%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
CAH
10.18%
FITB
2.52%
Debt to Equity
Winner
CAH
0.00%
FITB
58.76%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CAH
10.58%
FITB
2.99%
P/S Ratio
Winner
CAH
0.21
FITB
5.14
P/B Ratio
CAH
16.07
Winner
FITB
1.62

CAH vs FITB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CAH
-1.05%
Winner
FITB
+5.31%
3M
CAH
+10.64%
Winner
FITB
+13.14%
6M
CAH
+8.98%
Winner
FITB
+14.45%
1Y
Winner
CAH
+44.74%
FITB
+38.26%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CAH
+33.62%
FITB
+13.99%
10Y(CAGR)
CAH
+13.66%
Winner
FITB
+15.96%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CAH
+11.20%
FITB
+3.50%

CAH vs FITB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCAHFITB
2026+10.37%+21.72%
2025+75.87%+15.05%
2024+16.90%+26.06%
2023+34.37%+10.96%
2022+52.59%-23.88%
2021+0.83%+64.46%
2020+11.13%-6.21%
2019+16.76%+31.40%
2018-26.84%-20.55%
2017-15.59%+14.66%
2016-16.31%+41.72%
2015+12.86%+2.10%
2014+24.29%+0.01%
2013+64.01%+36.82%
2012+1.64%+19.14%
2011+6.56%-11.91%
2010+20.32%+45.50%
2009+29.89%+14.38%
2008-38.35%-64.59%
2007-9.16%-35.49%
2006-7.40%+12.55%
2005+20.64%-17.70%
2004-2.36%-17.02%
2003-0.67%-0.27%
2002-7.46%-3.02%
2001-0.13%+8.69%
2000+102.37%+30.13%
1999+8.11%+0.08%

CAH vs FITB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CAH was -61.92%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 3015 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for FITB was -98.13%, occurring on Feb 20, 2009. Recovery took 4795 trading sessions.

The current CAH drawdown is -5.72%. The current FITB drawdown is -3.71%.

RankCAHFITB
#1-61.92%
Jun 20, 2001 - Jun 18, 2013
-98.13%
Apr 12, 2002 - Apr 29, 2021
#2-48.94%
Dec 30, 2015 - Oct 21, 2022
-51.66%
Jan 14, 2022 - Oct 17, 2024
#3-37.37%
Jan 14, 2000 - May 15, 2000
-39.75%
Nov 16, 1999 - Sep 11, 2000
#4-20.42%
Mar 2, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026
-29.96%
Nov 25, 2024 - Dec 10, 2025
#5-18.14%
Mar 12, 2024 - Sep 3, 2024
-22.00%
Dec 27, 2000 - Jun 4, 2001
#6-17.80%
Nov 29, 1999 - Jan 6, 2000
-21.21%
Feb 6, 2026 - Jun 12, 2026
#7-15.34%
Apr 22, 2015 - Dec 29, 2015
-19.17%
Oct 5, 2000 - Dec 20, 2000
#8-15.30%
Dec 28, 2000 - May 11, 2001
-18.71%
May 17, 2021 - Sep 27, 2021
#9-14.23%
Nov 7, 2022 - Apr 11, 2023
-16.96%
Aug 22, 2001 - Mar 1, 2002
#10-12.88%
Jul 7, 2025 - Oct 30, 2025
-9.67%
Oct 20, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022
#11-12.87%
Mar 4, 2014 - Aug 21, 2014
-6.19%
Sep 11, 2000 - Sep 26, 2000
#12-9.86%
Apr 2, 2025 - Apr 29, 2025
-6.00%
Jan 21, 2026 - Feb 4, 2026
#13-9.79%
Jul 5, 2023 - Nov 3, 2023
-5.60%
Oct 17, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024
#14-9.74%
Nov 27, 2000 - Dec 27, 2000
-5.26%
Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 15, 1999
#15-8.26%
Dec 13, 2023 - Jan 31, 2024
-5.25%
Jun 21, 2001 - Jul 13, 2001

Correlation

Correlation between CAH and FITB is 0.66 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.66
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CAH vs FITB dividend yield comparison.

YearCAHFITB
20260.68%1.40%
20250.99%3.29%
20241.28%3.41%
20231.98%3.94%
20222.57%3.84%
20213.80%2.62%
20203.62%3.92%
20193.80%3.06%
20184.24%3.14%
20173.00%1.98%
20162.41%1.97%
20151.68%2.59%
20141.65%2.50%
20131.77%2.23%
20122.34%2.37%
20112.07%2.20%
20101.98%0.27%
200932.30%0.41%
20081.57%9.08%
20070.78%6.76%
20060.51%3.86%
20050.31%3.87%
20040.21%2.77%
20030.43%1.91%
20020.17%1.67%
20010.15%1.35%
20000.12%1.17%
19990.05%0.33%

Select Stocks to Compare