C-P-N vs MET
Comparison between Citigroup Capital VIII 7875 Fixed rate Floating Rate trust Preferred Securities TruPS (C-P-N, Company) and Metlife Inc (MET, Company).
5-Year PerformanceC-P-N has outperformed MET, delivering a return of +10.1% compared to +8.6%
C-P-N vs MET - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
C-P-N vs MET - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
C-P-N vs MET - Annual Returns (2000 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | C-P-N | MET |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.08% | +6.22% |
| 2025 | +8.85% | -0.68% |
| 2024 | +14.67% | +25.32% |
| 2023 | +10.52% | -5.22% |
| 2022 | +9.58% | +17.84% |
| 2021 | +4.55% | +39.94% |
| 2020 | +8.52% | -4.75% |
| 2019 | +11.03% | +26.96% |
| 2018 | +4.02% | -15.17% |
| 2017 | +13.78% | +20.73% |
| 2016 | +5.81% | +18.14% |
| 2015 | +5.20% | -7.99% |
| 2014 | +5.21% | +4.36% |
| 2013 | +2.70% | +56.96% |
| 2012 | +14.55% | +5.14% |
| 2011 | +4.26% | -30.90% |
| 2010 | +4.02% | +24.58% |
| 2009 | N/A | +0.43% |
| 2008 | N/A | -39.80% |
| 2007 | N/A | +3.63% |
| 2006 | N/A | +18.01% |
| 2005 | N/A | +23.28% |
| 2004 | N/A | +22.16% |
| 2003 | N/A | +21.79% |
| 2002 | N/A | -12.17% |
| 2001 | N/A | -6.14% |
| 2000 | N/A | +127.52% |
C-P-N vs MET Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for C-P-N was -20.68%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 167 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for MET was -82.33%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 2306 trading sessions.
The current C-P-N drawdown is -1.57%. The current MET drawdown is -0.53%.
| Rank | C-P-N | MET |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -20.68% Feb 11, 2020 - Oct 8, 2020 | -82.33% Oct 5, 2007 - Dec 1, 2016 |
| #2 | -12.70% May 17, 2011 - Oct 28, 2011 | -55.16% Feb 12, 2020 - Jan 14, 2021 |
| #3 | -6.22% Jan 26, 2021 - Jun 8, 2021 | -42.73% Dec 8, 2000 - Mar 29, 2004 |
| #4 | -6.06% Jan 31, 2023 - Apr 6, 2023 | -35.09% Nov 25, 2022 - Mar 27, 2024 |
| #5 | -5.92% Oct 28, 2011 - Jan 24, 2012 | -28.35% Nov 2, 2017 - Jan 2, 2020 |
| #6 | -5.43% Feb 3, 2025 - Jul 7, 2025 | -21.97% Nov 27, 2024 - Apr 8, 2025 |
| #7 | -4.37% Mar 13, 2012 - Jun 14, 2012 | -19.45% Apr 20, 2022 - Oct 28, 2022 |
| #8 | -4.17% May 7, 2013 - Feb 14, 2014 | -16.22% May 7, 2021 - Oct 20, 2021 |
| #9 | -3.99% Dec 31, 2021 - Apr 4, 2022 | -15.13% Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 8, 2004 |
| #10 | -3.98% Apr 28, 2023 - Jul 12, 2023 | -13.64% May 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007 |
| #11 | -3.50% Dec 29, 2015 - Mar 16, 2016 | -13.60% Oct 20, 2021 - Jan 6, 2022 |
| #12 | -3.25% Sep 2, 2021 - Dec 30, 2021 | -13.43% Feb 15, 2022 - Mar 30, 2022 |
| #13 | -3.02% May 5, 2022 - May 27, 2022 | -12.65% Sep 28, 2000 - Oct 31, 2000 |
| #14 | -2.79% Aug 22, 2023 - Sep 28, 2023 | -12.64% Nov 16, 2000 - Dec 4, 2000 |
| #15 | -2.79% Oct 26, 2023 - Nov 16, 2023 | -11.90% Jun 2, 2000 - Jun 29, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between C-P-N and MET is 0.96 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
C-P-N vs MET dividend yield comparison.
| Year | C-P-N | MET |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.52% | 1.38% |
| 2025 | 9.23% | 2.85% |
| 2024 | 10.14% | 2.63% |
| 2023 | 10.10% | 3.12% |
| 2022 | 6.73% | 2.74% |
| 2021 | 5.94% | 3.04% |
| 2020 | 6.74% | 3.88% |
| 2019 | 6.06% | 3.41% |
| 2018 | 7.99% | 4.04% |
| 2017 | 6.87% | 14.52% |
| 2016 | 6.86% | 2.92% |
| 2015 | 7.58% | 3.06% |
| 2014 | 7.41% | 2.45% |
| 2013 | 5.42% | 1.87% |
| 2012 | 7.06% | 2.25% |
| 2011 | 8.08% | 2.37% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 1.67% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 2.09% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 2.12% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 1.20% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.00% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.14% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 0.68% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 0.78% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 0.63% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 0.57% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks