BW vs LQDT

Comparison between Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises Inc (BW, Company) and Liquidity Services Inc (LQDT, Company).

BW is from the Industrials sector, while LQDT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceLQDT has outperformed BW, delivering a return of +12.8% compared to +10.6%

BW vs LQDT - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	BW(COMPANY)	LQDT(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$1.45B	$1.45B
Max Drawdown	99.89%	95.31%
Sharpe Ratio	2.42	1.34
5Y Beta	2.67	0.77
Industry	Specialty Industrial Machinery	Internet Retail
P/E Ratio	-13.89	47.53
Forward P/E	140.85	24.39
PEG Ratio	-0.92	2.68
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	12.50%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-4.28%	5.35%

Market Cap

$1.45B

Winner

LQDT

$1.45B

Max Drawdown

99.89%

Winner

LQDT

95.31%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

2.42

LQDT

1.34

5Y Beta

2.67

Winner

LQDT

0.77

Industry

Specialty Industrial Machinery

LQDT

Internet Retail

P/E Ratio

Winner

-13.89

LQDT

47.53

Forward P/E

140.85

Winner

LQDT

24.39

PEG Ratio

Winner

-0.92

LQDT

2.68

5Y EPS CAGR

N/A

LQDT

12.50%

Debt to Equity

0.00%

LQDT

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

-4.28%

Winner

LQDT

5.35%

BW vs LQDT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	BW	LQDT
1 month	-30.72%	-2.52%
3 months	-27.91%	+8.73%
6 months	+19.46%	+17.83%
1 year	+955.05%	+43.40%
5 years(CAGR)	+10.64%	+12.83%
10 years(CAGR)	-22.82%	+16.48%
Max(CAGR)	-22.85%	+5.81%

-30.72%

Winner

LQDT

-2.52%

-27.91%

Winner

LQDT

+8.73%

Winner

+19.46%

LQDT

+17.83%

Winner

+955.05%

LQDT

+43.40%

5Y(CAGR)

+10.64%

Winner

LQDT

+12.83%

10Y(CAGR)

-22.82%

Winner

LQDT

+16.48%

Max(CAGR)

-22.85%

Winner

LQDT

+5.81%

BW vs LQDT - Annual Returns (2006 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	BW	LQDT
2026	+77.78%	+26.63%
2025	+266.47%	-5.16%
2024	+11.56%	+88.50%
2023	-73.98%	+21.97%
2022	-37.35%	-36.75%
2021	+169.25%	+35.79%
2020	-6.40%	+174.31%
2019	-20.99%	-7.88%
2018	-93.27%	+31.28%
2017	-66.25%	-50.76%
2016	-18.60%	+49.08%
2015	+4.87%	-18.34%
2014	N/A	-63.62%
2013	N/A	-45.66%
2012	N/A	+8.96%
2011	N/A	+155.19%
2010	N/A	+38.42%
2009	N/A	+18.47%
2008	N/A	-33.84%
2007	N/A	-26.95%
2006	N/A	+45.23%

BW vs LQDT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for BW was -99.89%, occurring on Apr 21, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for LQDT was -95.31%, occurring on Mar 27, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current BW drawdown is -95.23%. The current LQDT drawdown is -42.58%.

Rank	BW	LQDT
#1	-99.89% Apr 28, 2016 - Apr 21, 2025	-95.31% May 9, 2012 - Mar 27, 2020
#2	-23.54% Aug 5, 2015 - Dec 24, 2015	-79.68% Feb 12, 2007 - Jun 23, 2011
#3	-13.02% Dec 24, 2015 - Mar 17, 2016	-53.04% May 31, 2006 - Nov 13, 2006
#4	-8.24% Jul 1, 2015 - Aug 3, 2015	-27.94% Aug 3, 2011 - Sep 1, 2011
#5	-7.09% Mar 17, 2016 - Apr 15, 2016	-20.38% Nov 20, 2006 - Feb 8, 2007
#6	-4.15% Apr 15, 2016 - Apr 22, 2016	-19.83% Sep 28, 2011 - Dec 6, 2011
#7	-0.32% Apr 22, 2016 - Apr 26, 2016	-15.03% May 5, 2006 - May 26, 2006
#8	N/A	-14.41% Jan 10, 2012 - Feb 13, 2012
#9	N/A	-12.97% Sep 16, 2011 - Sep 28, 2011
#10	N/A	-8.67% Sep 6, 2011 - Sep 15, 2011
#11	N/A	-8.65% Mar 24, 2006 - Apr 19, 2006
#12	N/A	-7.57% Mar 26, 2012 - Apr 5, 2012
#13	N/A	-6.75% Dec 16, 2011 - Jan 10, 2012
#14	N/A	-6.64% Jul 20, 2011 - Aug 2, 2011
#15	N/A	-6.55% Feb 27, 2012 - Mar 9, 2012

Correlation

Correlation between BW and LQDT is -0.40 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.

-0.40

-101