BTU vs NG
Comparison between Peabody Energy Corp New (BTU, Company) and Novagold Resources Inc (NG, Company).
BTU is from the Energy sector, while NG is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceBTU has outperformed NG, delivering a return of +14.9% compared to -5.3%
BTU vs NG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BTU vs NG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BTU vs NG - Annual Returns (2003 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BTU | NG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -28.59% | -35.43% |
| 2025 | +44.81% | +171.72% |
| 2024 | -13.07% | -12.37% |
| 2023 | -2.16% | -38.18% |
| 2022 | +132.98% | -10.34% |
| 2021 | +242.52% | -33.72% |
| 2020 | -75.88% | +9.39% |
| 2019 | -67.95% | +126.26% |
| 2018 | -21.75% | -2.71% |
| 2017 | +27.00% | -14.38% |
| 2016 | N/A | +5.80% |
| 2015 | N/A | +35.81% |
| 2014 | N/A | +6.12% |
| 2013 | N/A | -47.41% |
| 2012 | N/A | -39.61% |
| 2011 | N/A | -39.86% |
| 2010 | N/A | +125.79% |
| 2009 | N/A | +287.97% |
| 2008 | N/A | -83.39% |
| 2007 | N/A | -49.78% |
| 2006 | N/A | +80.63% |
| 2005 | N/A | +24.66% |
| 2004 | N/A | +52.26% |
| 2003 | N/A | -1.97% |
BTU vs NG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BTU was -98.07%, occurring on Nov 10, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for NG was -97.85%, occurring on Dec 2, 2008. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current BTU drawdown is -47.10%. The current NG drawdown is -65.36%.
| Rank | BTU | NG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.07% Jun 14, 2018 - Nov 10, 2020 | -97.85% Nov 9, 2007 - Dec 2, 2008 |
| #2 | -25.77% Apr 3, 2017 - Nov 1, 2017 | -42.01% Jan 9, 2004 - Sep 13, 2004 |
| #3 | -13.95% Feb 15, 2018 - May 17, 2018 | -35.40% May 2, 2006 - Jul 26, 2006 |
| #4 | -8.07% Jan 26, 2018 - Feb 14, 2018 | -28.87% Feb 23, 2005 - Jan 9, 2006 |
| #5 | -3.03% May 21, 2018 - May 30, 2018 | -23.92% Sep 1, 2006 - Oct 10, 2007 |
| #6 | -2.54% Nov 6, 2017 - Nov 20, 2017 | -17.75% Nov 29, 2004 - Feb 10, 2005 |
| #7 | -2.54% Jan 12, 2018 - Jan 26, 2018 | -14.56% Dec 8, 2003 - Jan 5, 2004 |
| #8 | -2.20% Jun 7, 2018 - Jun 14, 2018 | -12.96% Mar 3, 2006 - Mar 29, 2006 |
| #9 | -2.12% Dec 1, 2017 - Dec 7, 2017 | -12.24% Oct 15, 2007 - Oct 25, 2007 |
| #10 | -0.99% Dec 28, 2017 - Jan 5, 2018 | -9.99% Apr 5, 2006 - May 2, 2006 |
| #11 | -0.97% Dec 26, 2017 - Dec 28, 2017 | -9.02% Feb 6, 2006 - Feb 24, 2006 |
| #12 | -0.89% Dec 13, 2017 - Dec 18, 2017 | -7.06% Jan 13, 2006 - Jan 26, 2006 |
| #13 | -0.89% Nov 24, 2017 - Nov 28, 2017 | -5.38% Sep 23, 2004 - Oct 5, 2004 |
| #14 | -0.84% May 17, 2018 - May 21, 2018 | -4.81% Oct 29, 2007 - Nov 2, 2007 |
| #15 | -0.57% Nov 1, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017 | -4.38% Oct 25, 2004 - Nov 3, 2004 |
Correlation
Correlation between BTU and NG is -0.53 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2012 - 2026)
BTU vs NG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BTU | NG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.69% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 1.01% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 1.43% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 0.93% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 26.43% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 1.59% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 15.52% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks