StockComparison Logo
vs

BTU vs NG

Comparison between Peabody Energy Corp New (BTU, Company) and Novagold Resources Inc (NG, Company).

BTU is from the Energy sector, while NG is from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceBTU has outperformed NG, delivering a return of +14.9% compared to -5.3%

BTU vs NG - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
BTU
$2.54B
Winner
NG
$2.54B
Max Drawdown
BTU
98.25%
Winner
NG
97.85%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
BTU
0.76
NG
0.51
5Y Beta
Winner
BTU
0.79
NG
1.43
Industry
BTU
Thermal Coal
NG
Gold
P/E Ratio
Winner
BTU
-26.50
NG
-21.71
Forward P/E
BTU
24.69
Winner
NG
4.90
PEG Ratio
BTU
0.00
Winner
NG
-0.18
Dividend Yield
BTU
1.40%
NG
N/A
Debt to Equity
BTU
0.00%
NG
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
BTU
-6.60%
Winner
NG
-0.53%
P/S Ratio
Winner
BTU
0.73
NG
3615.48
P/B Ratio
Winner
BTU
0.81
NG
6.07

BTU vs NG - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
BTU
-2.29%
NG
-7.76%
3M
Winner
BTU
-17.58%
NG
-25.28%
6M
BTU
-37.81%
Winner
NG
-35.15%
1Y
Winner
BTU
+31.84%
NG
+8.39%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
BTU
+14.88%
NG
-5.28%
10Y(CAGR)
BTU
-2.18%
Winner
NG
-1.57%
Max(CAGR)
BTU
-2.18%
Winner
NG
+1.58%

BTU vs NG - Annual Returns (2003 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearBTUNG
2026-28.59%-35.43%
2025+44.81%+171.72%
2024-13.07%-12.37%
2023-2.16%-38.18%
2022+132.98%-10.34%
2021+242.52%-33.72%
2020-75.88%+9.39%
2019-67.95%+126.26%
2018-21.75%-2.71%
2017+27.00%-14.38%
2016N/A+5.80%
2015N/A+35.81%
2014N/A+6.12%
2013N/A-47.41%
2012N/A-39.61%
2011N/A-39.86%
2010N/A+125.79%
2009N/A+287.97%
2008N/A-83.39%
2007N/A-49.78%
2006N/A+80.63%
2005N/A+24.66%
2004N/A+52.26%
2003N/A-1.97%

BTU vs NG Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for BTU was -98.07%, occurring on Nov 10, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for NG was -97.85%, occurring on Dec 2, 2008. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current BTU drawdown is -47.10%. The current NG drawdown is -65.36%.

RankBTUNG
#1-98.07%
Jun 14, 2018 - Nov 10, 2020
-97.85%
Nov 9, 2007 - Dec 2, 2008
#2-25.77%
Apr 3, 2017 - Nov 1, 2017
-42.01%
Jan 9, 2004 - Sep 13, 2004
#3-13.95%
Feb 15, 2018 - May 17, 2018
-35.40%
May 2, 2006 - Jul 26, 2006
#4-8.07%
Jan 26, 2018 - Feb 14, 2018
-28.87%
Feb 23, 2005 - Jan 9, 2006
#5-3.03%
May 21, 2018 - May 30, 2018
-23.92%
Sep 1, 2006 - Oct 10, 2007
#6-2.54%
Nov 6, 2017 - Nov 20, 2017
-17.75%
Nov 29, 2004 - Feb 10, 2005
#7-2.54%
Jan 12, 2018 - Jan 26, 2018
-14.56%
Dec 8, 2003 - Jan 5, 2004
#8-2.20%
Jun 7, 2018 - Jun 14, 2018
-12.96%
Mar 3, 2006 - Mar 29, 2006
#9-2.12%
Dec 1, 2017 - Dec 7, 2017
-12.24%
Oct 15, 2007 - Oct 25, 2007
#10-0.99%
Dec 28, 2017 - Jan 5, 2018
-9.99%
Apr 5, 2006 - May 2, 2006
#11-0.97%
Dec 26, 2017 - Dec 28, 2017
-9.02%
Feb 6, 2006 - Feb 24, 2006
#12-0.89%
Dec 13, 2017 - Dec 18, 2017
-7.06%
Jan 13, 2006 - Jan 26, 2006
#13-0.89%
Nov 24, 2017 - Nov 28, 2017
-5.38%
Sep 23, 2004 - Oct 5, 2004
#14-0.84%
May 17, 2018 - May 21, 2018
-4.81%
Oct 29, 2007 - Nov 2, 2007
#15-0.57%
Nov 1, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017
-4.38%
Oct 25, 2004 - Nov 3, 2004

Correlation

Correlation between BTU and NG is -0.53 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.

-0.53
-101

Dividend Comparison (2012 - 2026)

BTU vs NG dividend yield comparison.

YearBTUNG
20260.69%0.00%
20251.01%0.00%
20241.43%0.00%
20230.93%0.00%
201926.43%0.00%
20181.59%0.00%
20120.00%15.52%

Select Stocks to Compare