BTU vs CWT
Comparison between Peabody Energy Corp New (BTU, Company) and California Water Service Group (CWT, Company).
BTU is from the Energy sector, while CWT is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceBTU has outperformed CWT, delivering a return of +26.1% compared to -1.3%
BTU vs CWT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BTU vs CWT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BTU vs CWT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BTU | CWT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -22.33% | +12.42% |
| 2025 | +44.81% | -0.56% |
| 2024 | -13.07% | -10.67% |
| 2023 | -2.16% | -14.49% |
| 2022 | +132.98% | -14.14% |
| 2021 | +242.52% | +36.49% |
| 2020 | -75.88% | +8.60% |
| 2019 | -67.95% | +13.02% |
| 2018 | -21.75% | +8.62% |
| 2017 | +27.00% | +36.99% |
| 2016 | N/A | +50.02% |
| 2015 | N/A | -2.76% |
| 2014 | N/A | +13.13% |
| 2013 | N/A | +27.66% |
| 2012 | N/A | +4.24% |
| 2011 | N/A | +0.31% |
| 2010 | N/A | +4.11% |
| 2009 | N/A | -17.22% |
| 2008 | N/A | +30.29% |
| 2007 | N/A | -3.71% |
| 2006 | N/A | +8.87% |
| 2005 | N/A | +7.39% |
| 2004 | N/A | +41.17% |
| 2003 | N/A | +18.55% |
| 2002 | N/A | -1.59% |
| 2001 | N/A | +4.86% |
| 2000 | N/A | +0.59% |
| 1999 | N/A | +1.03% |
BTU vs CWT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BTU was -98.07%, occurring on Nov 10, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for CWT was -38.22%, occurring on Jan 10, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current BTU drawdown is -42.47%. The current CWT drawdown is -26.82%.
| Rank | BTU | CWT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.07% Jun 14, 2018 - Nov 10, 2020 | -38.22% Jan 3, 2022 - Jan 10, 2025 |
| #2 | -25.77% Apr 3, 2017 - Nov 1, 2017 | -31.27% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 22, 2003 |
| #3 | -13.95% Feb 15, 2018 - May 17, 2018 | -30.88% Oct 31, 2007 - Dec 17, 2008 |
| #4 | -8.07% Jan 26, 2018 - Feb 14, 2018 | -26.71% Dec 31, 2008 - Feb 19, 2013 |
| #5 | -3.03% May 21, 2018 - May 30, 2018 | -25.99% Feb 18, 2020 - Jan 6, 2021 |
| #6 | -2.54% Nov 6, 2017 - Nov 20, 2017 | -25.15% Apr 21, 2006 - Jan 10, 2007 |
| #7 | -2.54% Jan 12, 2018 - Jan 26, 2018 | -22.54% Jan 29, 2015 - Feb 12, 2016 |
| #8 | -2.20% Jun 7, 2018 - Jun 14, 2018 | -21.98% Nov 30, 2017 - Nov 16, 2018 |
| #9 | -2.12% Dec 1, 2017 - Dec 7, 2017 | -21.54% Aug 3, 2005 - Jan 27, 2006 |
| #10 | -0.99% Dec 28, 2017 - Jan 5, 2018 | -21.46% Jan 10, 2007 - Aug 8, 2007 |
| #11 | -0.97% Dec 26, 2017 - Dec 28, 2017 | -18.56% Aug 9, 2007 - Oct 29, 2007 |
| #12 | -0.89% Dec 13, 2017 - Dec 18, 2017 | -17.83% Jun 18, 2003 - Apr 27, 2004 |
| #13 | -0.89% Nov 24, 2017 - Nov 28, 2017 | -14.80% Dec 30, 2004 - Jun 1, 2005 |
| #14 | -0.84% May 17, 2018 - May 21, 2018 | -14.76% Jul 5, 2016 - Nov 22, 2016 |
| #15 | -0.57% Nov 1, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017 | -14.67% Mar 25, 2014 - Jun 27, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between BTU and CWT is -0.30 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
BTU vs CWT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BTU | CWT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.63% | 1.41% |
| 2025 | 1.01% | 2.86% |
| 2024 | 1.43% | 2.47% |
| 2023 | 0.93% | 2.01% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 1.65% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 1.28% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 1.57% |
| 2019 | 26.43% | 1.53% |
| 2018 | 1.59% | 1.57% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 1.59% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 2.04% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 2.88% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 2.64% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 2.77% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 3.43% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 3.37% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 3.19% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 3.20% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 2.52% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 3.13% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 3.57% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 2.98% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 4.11% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 4.74% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 5.42% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 4.13% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks