BTU vs AWR
Comparison between Peabody Energy Corp New (BTU, Company) and American States Water Company (AWR, Company).
BTU is from the Energy sector, while AWR is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceBTU has outperformed AWR, delivering a return of +25.9% compared to +2.0%
BTU vs AWR - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BTU vs AWR - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BTU vs AWR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BTU | AWR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -20.56% | +10.85% |
| 2025 | +44.81% | -2.93% |
| 2024 | -13.07% | -1.24% |
| 2023 | -2.16% | -13.87% |
| 2022 | +132.98% | -8.38% |
| 2021 | +242.52% | +34.49% |
| 2020 | -75.88% | -5.88% |
| 2019 | -67.95% | +34.19% |
| 2018 | -21.75% | +21.07% |
| 2017 | +27.00% | +31.53% |
| 2016 | N/A | +14.98% |
| 2015 | N/A | +12.45% |
| 2014 | N/A | +38.36% |
| 2013 | N/A | +19.92% |
| 2012 | N/A | +41.64% |
| 2011 | N/A | +2.81% |
| 2010 | N/A | -1.99% |
| 2009 | N/A | +6.65% |
| 2008 | N/A | -8.40% |
| 2007 | N/A | +0.06% |
| 2006 | N/A | +24.54% |
| 2005 | N/A | +22.72% |
| 2004 | N/A | +7.70% |
| 2003 | N/A | +10.54% |
| 2002 | N/A | +1.56% |
| 2001 | N/A | +4.37% |
| 2000 | N/A | +7.14% |
| 1999 | N/A | +4.13% |
BTU vs AWR Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BTU was -98.07%, occurring on Nov 10, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for AWR was -37.38%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 1175 trading sessions.
The current BTU drawdown is -41.15%. The current AWR drawdown is -15.78%.
| Rank | BTU | AWR |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.07% Jun 14, 2018 - Nov 10, 2020 | -37.38% Oct 31, 2007 - Jun 29, 2012 |
| #2 | -25.77% Apr 3, 2017 - Nov 1, 2017 | -33.96% Dec 10, 1999 - Aug 14, 2001 |
| #3 | -13.95% Feb 15, 2018 - May 17, 2018 | -32.89% Dec 31, 2021 - Apr 16, 2024 |
| #4 | -8.07% Jan 26, 2018 - Feb 14, 2018 | -30.77% Oct 31, 2019 - Aug 31, 2021 |
| #5 | -3.03% May 21, 2018 - May 30, 2018 | -27.18% Jun 21, 2002 - Jun 16, 2003 |
| #6 | -2.54% Nov 6, 2017 - Nov 20, 2017 | -22.83% Jun 17, 2003 - Feb 18, 2005 |
| #7 | -2.54% Jan 12, 2018 - Jan 26, 2018 | -22.75% Aug 7, 2013 - Mar 18, 2014 |
| #8 | -2.20% Jun 7, 2018 - Jun 14, 2018 | -20.13% May 10, 2006 - Oct 26, 2006 |
| #9 | -2.12% Dec 1, 2017 - Dec 7, 2017 | -19.39% Feb 24, 2016 - Apr 26, 2017 |
| #10 | -0.99% Dec 28, 2017 - Jan 5, 2018 | -18.14% Oct 30, 2006 - Aug 8, 2007 |
| #11 | -0.97% Dec 26, 2017 - Dec 28, 2017 | -15.32% Jan 24, 2018 - Jul 5, 2018 |
| #12 | -0.89% Dec 13, 2017 - Dec 18, 2017 | -14.69% May 3, 2002 - Jun 19, 2002 |
| #13 | -0.89% Nov 24, 2017 - Nov 28, 2017 | -14.43% Jul 28, 2005 - Sep 29, 2005 |
| #14 | -0.84% May 17, 2018 - May 21, 2018 | -14.36% Sep 29, 2005 - Jan 27, 2006 |
| #15 | -0.57% Nov 1, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017 | -13.64% Aug 30, 2001 - Dec 7, 2001 |
Correlation
Correlation between BTU and AWR is -0.35 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
BTU vs AWR dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BTU | AWR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.62% | 1.28% |
| 2025 | 1.01% | 2.68% |
| 2024 | 1.43% | 2.30% |
| 2023 | 0.93% | 2.06% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 1.65% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 1.35% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 1.61% |
| 2019 | 26.43% | 1.34% |
| 2018 | 1.59% | 1.58% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 1.72% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 2.01% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 2.08% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 2.21% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 2.65% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 2.65% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 3.15% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 3.02% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 2.85% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 3.03% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 2.53% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 2.36% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 2.92% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 3.42% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 3.54% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 3.76% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 3.72% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 3.48% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.89% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks