BMI vs SLG
Comparison between Badger Meter Inc (BMI, Company) and SL Green Realty Corp (SLG, Company).
BMI is from the Technology sector, while SLG is from the Real Estate sector.
5-Year PerformanceBMI has outperformed SLG, delivering a return of +5.7% compared to -0.1%
BMI vs SLG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BMI vs SLG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BMI vs SLG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BMI | SLG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -27.92% | +19.64% |
| 2025 | -17.00% | -29.51% |
| 2024 | +36.49% | +55.60% |
| 2023 | +41.75% | +46.72% |
| 2022 | +3.34% | -53.10% |
| 2021 | +18.12% | +27.82% |
| 2020 | +48.79% | -26.79% |
| 2019 | +34.38% | +22.95% |
| 2018 | +4.76% | -18.59% |
| 2017 | +31.08% | -4.14% |
| 2016 | +31.60% | +0.52% |
| 2015 | +1.40% | -4.81% |
| 2014 | +13.47% | +31.93% |
| 2013 | +12.01% | +19.77% |
| 2012 | +62.60% | +14.04% |
| 2011 | -33.73% | -2.84% |
| 2010 | +10.25% | +38.88% |
| 2009 | +30.02% | +110.07% |
| 2008 | -34.27% | -70.73% |
| 2007 | +67.19% | -28.17% |
| 2006 | +41.45% | +74.74% |
| 2005 | +32.42% | +32.31% |
| 2004 | +62.34% | +53.15% |
| 2003 | +26.40% | +36.32% |
| 2002 | +48.91% | +9.71% |
| 2001 | +1.44% | +15.82% |
| 2000 | -20.97% | +37.10% |
| 1999 | -4.18% | +17.56% |
BMI vs SLG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BMI was -68.22%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 1420 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for SLG was -94.03%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 2043 trading sessions.
The current BMI drawdown is -49.76%. The current SLG drawdown is -30.17%.
| Rank | BMI | SLG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -68.22% Aug 8, 2008 - Apr 1, 2014 | -94.03% Feb 7, 2007 - Mar 20, 2015 |
| #2 | -55.07% Jun 3, 2025 - Apr 20, 2026 | -79.45% Mar 20, 2015 - Mar 23, 2023 |
| #3 | -42.62% Apr 3, 2000 - Aug 29, 2002 | -22.23% Jun 25, 2002 - May 22, 2003 |
| #4 | -38.97% Feb 20, 2020 - Oct 9, 2020 | -16.51% Apr 2, 2004 - Jul 2, 2004 |
| #5 | -36.13% May 2, 2006 - Jul 19, 2007 | -15.30% Jul 28, 2000 - May 22, 2001 |
| #6 | -35.11% Aug 5, 2005 - Jan 27, 2006 | -12.96% Dec 31, 2004 - Apr 29, 2005 |
| #7 | -33.19% Dec 8, 2021 - Oct 25, 2022 | -9.09% Mar 1, 2000 - Mar 23, 2000 |
| #8 | -28.05% Dec 11, 2024 - May 13, 2025 | -8.24% Nov 21, 2006 - Jan 16, 2007 |
| #9 | -22.37% Feb 20, 2003 - Aug 25, 2003 | -8.24% Aug 2, 2005 - Nov 10, 2005 |
| #10 | -21.13% Dec 26, 2007 - Mar 27, 2008 | -8.15% May 5, 2000 - Jun 20, 2000 |
| #11 | -20.36% Aug 14, 2023 - Apr 18, 2024 | -7.75% Jul 8, 2003 - Oct 1, 2003 |
| #12 | -20.12% Jul 19, 2007 - Aug 16, 2007 | -7.59% Aug 15, 2001 - Sep 27, 2001 |
| #13 | -19.51% Jun 9, 2016 - Dec 8, 2016 | -7.53% Mar 29, 2006 - May 10, 2006 |
| #14 | -19.13% Oct 12, 2017 - Jul 20, 2018 | -6.79% Oct 20, 2003 - Dec 11, 2003 |
| #15 | -18.52% Aug 29, 2002 - Feb 20, 2003 | -6.31% Sep 28, 2001 - Jan 14, 2002 |
Correlation
Correlation between BMI and SLG is 0.30 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
BMI vs SLG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BMI | SLG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.63% | 2.26% |
| 2025 | 0.85% | 6.18% |
| 2024 | 0.58% | 4.43% |
| 2023 | 0.64% | 7.15% |
| 2022 | 0.78% | 10.94% |
| 2021 | 0.71% | 5.09% |
| 2020 | 0.74% | 7.81% |
| 2019 | 0.99% | 3.74% |
| 2018 | 1.14% | 4.16% |
| 2017 | 1.03% | 3.11% |
| 2016 | 1.16% | 2.73% |
| 2015 | 1.33% | 2.23% |
| 2014 | 1.25% | 1.76% |
| 2013 | 1.28% | 1.61% |
| 2012 | 1.39% | 1.41% |
| 2011 | 2.04% | 0.83% |
| 2010 | 1.18% | 0.59% |
| 2009 | 1.16% | 1.34% |
| 2008 | 1.38% | 10.57% |
| 2007 | 0.76% | 3.09% |
| 2006 | 1.12% | 1.88% |
| 2005 | 1.48% | 2.91% |
| 2004 | 1.60% | 3.37% |
| 2003 | 2.78% | 4.62% |
| 2002 | 3.18% | 5.67% |
| 2001 | 4.47% | 5.23% |
| 2000 | 3.74% | 5.25% |
| 1999 | 0.60% | 1.66% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks