BMI vs CGAU
Comparison between Badger Meter Inc (BMI, Company) and Vitalist Inc (CGAU, Company).
BMI is from the Technology sector, while CGAU is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceCGAU has outperformed BMI, delivering a return of +25.9% compared to +5.3%
BMI vs CGAU - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BMI vs CGAU - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BMI vs CGAU - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BMI | CGAU |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -25.63% | +51.10% |
| 2025 | -17.00% | +150.60% |
| 2024 | +36.49% | +1.14% |
| 2023 | +41.75% | +15.29% |
| 2022 | +3.34% | -37.74% |
| 2021 | +18.12% | -35.80% |
| 2020 | +48.79% | +47.89% |
| 2019 | +34.38% | +84.63% |
| 2018 | +4.76% | -17.65% |
| 2017 | +31.08% | +6.25% |
| 2016 | +31.60% | -3.38% |
| 2015 | +1.40% | N/A |
| 2014 | +13.47% | N/A |
| 2013 | +12.01% | N/A |
| 2012 | +62.60% | N/A |
| 2011 | -33.73% | N/A |
| 2010 | +10.25% | N/A |
| 2009 | +30.02% | N/A |
| 2008 | -34.27% | N/A |
| 2007 | +67.19% | N/A |
| 2006 | +41.45% | N/A |
| 2005 | +32.42% | N/A |
| 2004 | +62.34% | N/A |
| 2003 | +26.40% | N/A |
| 2002 | +48.91% | N/A |
| 2001 | +1.44% | N/A |
| 2000 | -20.97% | N/A |
| 1999 | -4.18% | N/A |
BMI vs CGAU Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BMI was -68.22%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 1420 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CGAU was -73.37%, occurring on Sep 26, 2022. Recovery took 1336 trading sessions.
The current BMI drawdown is -48.16%. The current CGAU drawdown is -2.30%.
| Rank | BMI | CGAU |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -68.22% Aug 8, 2008 - Apr 1, 2014 | -73.37% Aug 5, 2020 - Nov 28, 2025 |
| #2 | -55.07% Jun 3, 2025 - Apr 20, 2026 | -51.25% Sep 12, 2017 - Jul 16, 2019 |
| #3 | -42.62% Apr 3, 2000 - Aug 29, 2002 | -48.13% Oct 18, 2019 - May 15, 2020 |
| #4 | -38.97% Feb 20, 2020 - Oct 9, 2020 | -33.31% Jul 5, 2016 - Sep 6, 2017 |
| #5 | -36.13% May 2, 2006 - Jul 19, 2007 | -29.50% Feb 27, 2026 - Aug 7, 2026 |
| #6 | -35.11% Aug 5, 2005 - Jan 27, 2006 | -23.22% Jan 7, 2016 - Mar 4, 2016 |
| #7 | -33.19% Dec 8, 2021 - Oct 25, 2022 | -22.12% Mar 8, 2016 - Apr 20, 2016 |
| #8 | -28.05% Dec 11, 2024 - May 13, 2025 | -19.33% Aug 27, 2019 - Oct 10, 2019 |
| #9 | -22.37% Feb 20, 2003 - Aug 25, 2003 | -17.91% Jan 28, 2026 - Feb 26, 2026 |
| #10 | -21.13% Dec 26, 2007 - Mar 27, 2008 | -16.47% May 16, 2016 - Jun 27, 2016 |
| #11 | -20.36% Aug 14, 2023 - Apr 18, 2024 | -9.97% May 29, 2020 - Jun 10, 2020 |
| #12 | -20.12% Jul 19, 2007 - Aug 16, 2007 | -7.54% Jun 10, 2020 - Jun 19, 2020 |
| #13 | -19.51% Jun 9, 2016 - Dec 8, 2016 | -6.79% Dec 26, 2025 - Jan 6, 2026 |
| #14 | -19.13% Oct 12, 2017 - Jul 20, 2018 | -6.25% Oct 10, 2019 - Oct 18, 2019 |
| #15 | -18.52% Aug 29, 2002 - Feb 20, 2003 | -6.18% Jul 24, 2019 - Aug 7, 2019 |
Correlation
Correlation between BMI and CGAU is 0.30 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
BMI vs CGAU dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BMI | CGAU |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.61% | 0.48% |
| 2025 | 0.85% | 1.39% |
| 2024 | 0.58% | 3.59% |
| 2023 | 0.64% | 3.45% |
| 2022 | 0.78% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 0.71% | 0.52% |
| 2020 | 0.74% | 1.15% |
| 2019 | 0.99% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 1.14% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 1.03% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 1.16% | 1.72% |
| 2015 | 1.33% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 1.25% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 1.28% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 1.39% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 2.04% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 1.18% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 1.16% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.38% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 0.76% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.12% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.48% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.60% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 2.78% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 3.18% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 4.47% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 3.74% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks