BMA vs SM
Comparison between Banco Macro S.A. (BMA, Company) and SM Energy Company (SM, Company).
BMA is from the Financial Services sector, while SM is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceBMA has outperformed SM, delivering a return of +53.4% compared to +7.4%
BMA vs SM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BMA vs SM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BMA vs SM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BMA | SM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +18.30% | +44.04% |
| 2025 | -14.47% | -51.47% |
| 2024 | +286.66% | +1.24% |
| 2023 | +98.94% | +23.24% |
| 2022 | +24.78% | +10.45% |
| 2021 | -4.10% | +363.97% |
| 2020 | -57.18% | -44.67% |
| 2019 | -13.37% | -26.03% |
| 2018 | -61.04% | -33.18% |
| 2017 | +66.78% | -35.30% |
| 2016 | +12.32% | +73.27% |
| 2015 | +39.04% | -48.64% |
| 2014 | +104.57% | -53.20% |
| 2013 | +27.40% | +52.35% |
| 2012 | -11.21% | -31.45% |
| 2011 | -59.83% | +21.34% |
| 2010 | +73.15% | +63.50% |
| 2009 | +151.68% | +56.80% |
| 2008 | -52.98% | -48.20% |
| 2007 | -21.87% | +10.56% |
| 2006 | +39.32% | -4.22% |
| 2005 | N/A | +82.35% |
| 2004 | N/A | +44.17% |
| 2003 | N/A | +11.53% |
| 2002 | N/A | +16.86% |
| 2001 | N/A | -30.19% |
| 2000 | N/A | +185.26% |
| 1999 | N/A | -0.33% |
BMA vs SM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BMA was -91.65%, occurring on Jul 21, 2022. Recovery took 1798 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for SM was -98.85%, occurring on Apr 1, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current BMA drawdown is -6.13%. The current SM drawdown is -66.29%.
| Rank | BMA | SM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -91.65% Oct 23, 2017 - Dec 16, 2024 | -98.85% Nov 26, 2013 - Apr 1, 2020 |
| #2 | -81.41% Feb 13, 2007 - Jul 20, 2010 | -82.05% Jun 30, 2008 - Feb 15, 2011 |
| #3 | -77.47% Dec 10, 2010 - Feb 12, 2015 | -57.19% Jan 16, 2001 - Apr 12, 2004 |
| #4 | -65.39% Jan 7, 2025 - Sep 19, 2025 | -51.83% Oct 27, 2011 - Oct 18, 2013 |
| #5 | -43.92% Mar 17, 2015 - Nov 20, 2015 | -31.07% Aug 3, 2011 - Oct 26, 2011 |
| #6 | -23.18% Nov 20, 2015 - Feb 18, 2016 | -30.27% Jul 7, 2000 - Sep 6, 2000 |
| #7 | -22.89% Oct 19, 2016 - Feb 9, 2017 | -29.50% Apr 21, 2006 - May 2, 2008 |
| #8 | -21.80% May 10, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006 | -24.07% Nov 9, 1999 - Feb 1, 2000 |
| #9 | -19.36% Feb 25, 2016 - Apr 19, 2016 | -22.46% Oct 13, 2000 - Nov 21, 2000 |
| #10 | -18.55% Apr 19, 2016 - Jun 17, 2016 | -21.62% Dec 28, 2000 - Jan 16, 2001 |
| #11 | -12.09% Jun 5, 2017 - Aug 14, 2017 | -19.66% Apr 5, 2011 - Jul 15, 2011 |
| #12 | -10.90% Aug 25, 2016 - Oct 19, 2016 | -18.80% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 1, 2005 |
| #13 | -10.85% Dec 16, 2024 - Jan 2, 2025 | -18.52% Jan 30, 2006 - Apr 18, 2006 |
| #14 | -10.66% Jun 20, 2016 - Jul 13, 2016 | -16.88% Oct 3, 2005 - Dec 5, 2005 |
| #15 | -10.56% Aug 10, 2010 - Sep 14, 2010 | -16.26% Mar 10, 2000 - Apr 4, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between BMA and SM is -0.20 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
BMA vs SM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BMA | SM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.60% | 1.62% |
| 2025 | 2.38% | 5.35% |
| 2024 | 6.10% | 1.91% |
| 2023 | 7.75% | 1.55% |
| 2022 | 7.28% | 0.46% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 0.07% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 0.33% |
| 2019 | 6.20% | 0.89% |
| 2018 | 5.05% | 0.65% |
| 2017 | 0.65% | 0.45% |
| 2016 | 1.53% | 0.29% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 0.51% |
| 2014 | 7.15% | 0.26% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 0.12% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 0.19% |
| 2011 | 10.67% | 0.14% |
| 2010 | 1.77% | 0.17% |
| 2009 | 2.18% | 0.29% |
| 2008 | 7.34% | 0.49% |
| 2007 | 1.96% | 0.26% |
| 2006 | 1.99% | 0.27% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 0.27% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 0.24% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 0.35% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 0.40% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 0.47% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 0.32% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.20% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks