BIP vs MGA
Comparison between Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP, Company) and Magna International Inc (MGA, Company).
BIP is from the Utilities sector, while MGA is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.
5-Year PerformanceBIP has outperformed MGA, delivering a return of +5.4% compared to -3.1%
BIP vs MGA - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BIP vs MGA - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BIP vs MGA - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BIP | MGA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +14.61% | +19.48% |
| 2025 | +14.84% | +35.44% |
| 2024 | +7.69% | -26.45% |
| 2023 | +5.55% | +6.25% |
| 2022 | -21.10% | -28.62% |
| 2021 | +27.52% | +18.45% |
| 2020 | +15.36% | +31.85% |
| 2019 | +49.52% | +23.99% |
| 2018 | -18.87% | -19.10% |
| 2017 | +39.81% | +30.96% |
| 2016 | +42.16% | +11.28% |
| 2015 | -6.16% | -24.19% |
| 2014 | +13.17% | +36.73% |
| 2013 | +14.55% | +63.00% |
| 2012 | +31.91% | +50.70% |
| 2011 | +38.55% | -36.34% |
| 2010 | +34.03% | +97.20% |
| 2009 | +39.88% | +60.67% |
| 2008 | -37.64% | -60.24% |
| 2007 | N/A | +1.24% |
| 2006 | N/A | +13.08% |
| 2005 | N/A | -10.22% |
| 2004 | N/A | +3.66% |
| 2003 | N/A | +59.93% |
| 2002 | N/A | -8.30% |
| 2001 | N/A | +56.51% |
| 2000 | N/A | +4.73% |
| 1999 | N/A | -5.32% |
BIP vs MGA Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BIP was -56.05%, occurring on Mar 4, 2009. Recovery took 541 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for MGA was -79.02%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 756 trading sessions.
The current BIP drawdown is -2.24%. The current MGA drawdown is -25.52%.
| Rank | BIP | MGA |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -56.05% Jan 28, 2008 - Mar 22, 2010 | -79.02% Nov 6, 2007 - Nov 5, 2010 |
| #2 | -51.31% Feb 20, 2020 - Nov 9, 2020 | -66.02% Jun 4, 2021 - Apr 8, 2025 |
| #3 | -49.84% Apr 20, 2022 - Feb 6, 2026 | -61.83% May 21, 2018 - Nov 24, 2020 |
| #4 | -28.40% Apr 6, 2015 - Jun 6, 2016 | -48.18% Jan 27, 2011 - Mar 28, 2013 |
| #5 | -25.40% Dec 27, 2017 - Jun 7, 2019 | -46.40% Jun 10, 2015 - Nov 30, 2017 |
| #6 | -17.02% Mar 22, 2010 - Sep 9, 2010 | -35.25% May 2, 2002 - Jul 29, 2003 |
| #7 | -16.61% Sep 20, 2011 - Dec 27, 2011 | -31.55% Aug 13, 2001 - Jan 7, 2002 |
| #8 | -14.38% Mar 4, 2013 - Oct 28, 2013 | -28.42% Jun 30, 2004 - May 5, 2006 |
| #9 | -12.60% Aug 29, 2014 - Dec 2, 2014 | -25.61% Aug 27, 2014 - May 8, 2015 |
| #10 | -12.48% Nov 18, 2013 - May 7, 2014 | -23.90% Jun 5, 2000 - Apr 18, 2001 |
| #11 | -12.25% Mar 2, 2026 - May 21, 2026 | -20.98% Jan 18, 2000 - Apr 13, 2000 |
| #12 | -10.86% Nov 8, 2010 - Feb 14, 2011 | -17.53% Jul 16, 2007 - Sep 27, 2007 |
| #13 | -10.64% Aug 3, 2011 - Aug 15, 2011 | -15.40% May 5, 2006 - Dec 14, 2006 |
| #14 | -10.05% Sep 30, 2016 - Jan 5, 2017 | -12.91% Nov 15, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000 |
| #15 | -9.25% Aug 22, 2012 - Jan 3, 2013 | -12.48% Dec 14, 2006 - May 10, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between BIP and MGA is 0.86 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
BIP vs MGA dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BIP | MGA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.45% | 1.54% |
| 2025 | 4.95% | 3.64% |
| 2024 | 5.10% | 4.55% |
| 2023 | 4.86% | 3.11% |
| 2022 | 4.65% | 4.22% |
| 2021 | 3.35% | 2.13% |
| 2020 | 3.92% | 2.26% |
| 2019 | 4.02% | 2.66% |
| 2018 | 5.45% | 2.18% |
| 2017 | 3.88% | 1.94% |
| 2016 | 4.62% | 2.30% |
| 2015 | 5.59% | 1.90% |
| 2014 | 4.59% | 1.40% |
| 2013 | 4.38% | 1.56% |
| 2012 | 4.26% | 2.20% |
| 2011 | 4.77% | 3.00% |
| 2010 | 5.22% | 0.81% |
| 2009 | 6.32% | 0.36% |
| 2008 | 7.89% | 5.41% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 1.43% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.89% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 2.11% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.79% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 14.16% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 3.49% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.14% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 3.46% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.16% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks