StockComparison Logo
vs

BIB vs NMS

Comparison between PROSHARES ULTRA NASDAQ BIOTECHNOLOGY (BIB, ETF) and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceNMS has outperformed BIB, delivering a return of -0.2% compared to -0.8%

BIB vs NMS - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Net Assets
BIB
$76M
Winner
NMS
$76M
Max Drawdown
BIB
67.24%
Winner
NMS
47.88%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
BIB
1.57
NMS
1.47
5Y Beta
BIB
1.51
Winner
NMS
0.05
P/E Ratio
BIB
-45.44
NMS
N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR
BIB
N/A
NMS
7.77%
Debt to Equity
BIB
65.72%
NMS
N/A
P/S Ratio
BIB
6.56
NMS
N/A
P/B Ratio
BIB
4.68
NMS
N/A

BIB vs NMS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
BIB
-3.11%
Winner
NMS
+1.54%
3M
BIB
-1.84%
Winner
NMS
+3.77%
6M
BIB
-0.92%
Winner
NMS
+6.39%
1Y
Winner
BIB
+79.08%
NMS
+15.71%
5Y(CAGR)
BIB
-0.79%
Winner
NMS
-0.16%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
BIB
+5.49%
NMS
+1.81%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
BIB
+16.00%
NMS
+3.32%

BIB vs NMS - Annual Returns (2010 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearBIBNMS
2026+0.81%+8.15%
2025+57.12%+2.31%
2024-13.29%+18.82%
2023+0.43%-0.21%
2022-29.88%-22.04%
2021-4.77%+6.60%
2020+41.55%+7.38%
2019+43.60%+23.39%
2018-28.47%-12.96%
2017+35.43%-4.05%
2016-40.15%+12.86%
2015+11.86%+6.24%
2014+66.93%-3.37%
2013+144.02%N/A
2012+64.72%N/A
2011+13.41%N/A
2010+0.29%N/A

BIB vs NMS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for BIB was -67.24%, occurring on Jun 27, 2016. Recovery took 1389 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for NMS was -38.76%, occurring on Oct 25, 2023. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current BIB drawdown is -26.00%. The current NMS drawdown is -2.97%.

RankBIBNMS
#1-67.24%
Jul 20, 2015 - Jan 25, 2021
-38.76%
Sep 16, 2021 - Oct 25, 2023
#2-66.19%
Feb 8, 2021 - Apr 8, 2025
-25.42%
Sep 30, 2016 - Aug 11, 2020
#3-40.88%
May 12, 2011 - Jan 18, 2012
-7.35%
Aug 19, 2020 - Oct 27, 2020
#4-39.01%
Feb 25, 2014 - Sep 24, 2014
-7.31%
Mar 18, 2015 - Jan 29, 2016
#5-36.30%
Apr 15, 2010 - Dec 17, 2010
-6.32%
Nov 6, 2014 - Jan 27, 2015
#6-24.73%
Oct 5, 2012 - Mar 1, 2013
-5.93%
Jun 23, 2021 - Sep 14, 2021
#7-20.33%
May 14, 2013 - Jul 11, 2013
-5.58%
Oct 15, 2014 - Nov 6, 2014
#8-17.74%
Mar 20, 2015 - Jun 18, 2015
-5.15%
May 4, 2021 - Jun 23, 2021
#9-17.57%
Oct 1, 2013 - Nov 22, 2013
-4.27%
Aug 15, 2016 - Sep 30, 2016
#10-16.83%
Sep 24, 2014 - Oct 23, 2014
-4.04%
Apr 13, 2016 - Jun 6, 2016
#11-13.85%
Dec 19, 2014 - Jan 20, 2015
-4.00%
Jul 6, 2016 - Aug 5, 2016
#12-13.72%
Aug 2, 2013 - Sep 5, 2013
-3.76%
Jun 17, 2016 - Jul 6, 2016
#13-13.27%
Jan 22, 2014 - Feb 11, 2014
-3.60%
Oct 27, 2020 - Nov 17, 2020
#14-13.06%
Dec 9, 2014 - Dec 19, 2014
-3.53%
Feb 11, 2021 - Apr 14, 2021
#15-11.31%
Jun 22, 2015 - Jul 14, 2015
-2.67%
Feb 11, 2016 - Feb 25, 2016

Correlation

Correlation between BIB and NMS is 0.35 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.35
-101

Dividend Comparison (2010 - 2026)

BIB vs NMS dividend yield comparison.

YearBIBNMS
20260.01%2.70%
20250.77%7.29%
20241.69%6.05%
20230.07%4.03%
20220.03%5.24%
20210.00%4.19%
20200.00%3.93%
20190.00%4.05%
20180.00%5.52%
20170.00%5.20%
20160.00%4.68%
20150.00%5.60%
20140.00%0.96%
20100.15%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare