StockComparison Logo
vs

BHP vs IBM

Comparison between BHP Group Ltd (BHP, Company) and International Business Machines Corp (IBM, Company).

BHP is from the Basic Materials sector, while IBM is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceIBM has outperformed BHP, delivering a return of +15.6% compared to +15.2%

BHP vs IBM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
BHP
$227B
IBM
$222B
Max Drawdown
BHP
80.09%
Winner
IBM
58.79%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
BHP
1.82
IBM
0.08
5Y Beta
BHP
1.03
Winner
IBM
0.74
Industry
BHP
Other Industrial Metals & Mining
IBM
Information Technology Services
P/E Ratio
Winner
BHP
10.50
IBM
30.17
Forward P/E
Winner
BHP
16.56
IBM
18.98
PEG Ratio
BHP
5.95
Winner
IBM
0.41
Dividend Yield
BHP
1.52%
Winner
IBM
2.86%
5Y Dividends CAGR
BHP
5.63%
Winner
IBM
6.14%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
BHP
16.99%
IBM
-3.72%
Debt to Equity
Winner
BHP
62.55%
IBM
179.92%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
BHP
9.17%
IBM
6.21%
P/S Ratio
BHP
4.21
Winner
IBM
3.22
P/B Ratio
Winner
BHP
4.26
IBM
6.43

BHP vs IBM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
BHP
+5.09%
IBM
-22.07%
3M
Winner
BHP
+4.23%
IBM
+4.17%
6M
Winner
BHP
+28.79%
IBM
-20.88%
1Y
Winner
BHP
+77.85%
IBM
-5.09%
5Y(CAGR)
BHP
+15.20%
Winner
IBM
+15.59%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
BHP
+20.75%
IBM
+8.55%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
BHP
+13.99%
IBM
+6.16%

BHP vs IBM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearBHPIBM
2026+45.22%-18.87%
2025+27.88%+38.19%
2024-24.24%+41.04%
2023+17.86%+21.31%
2022+44.04%+8.77%
2021-2.07%+18.53%
2020+25.10%-2.20%
2019+25.60%+21.92%
2018+7.03%-22.96%
2017+29.43%-4.67%
2016+43.42%+26.73%
2015-39.14%-12.30%
2014-26.80%-11.43%
2013-11.78%-2.62%
2012+8.31%+4.56%
2011-22.20%+26.80%
2010+19.58%+12.95%
2009+74.27%+52.78%
2008-37.79%-18.18%
2007+83.39%+12.70%
2006+15.62%+19.97%
2005+44.48%-15.12%
2004+31.80%+8.51%
2003+63.77%+15.90%
2002+7.06%-35.76%
2001+5.14%+43.32%
2000-17.20%-26.39%
1999+31.73%+11.64%

BHP vs IBM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for BHP was -76.24%, occurring on Jan 20, 2016. Recovery took 2430 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for IBM was -58.31%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 1929 trading sessions.

The current BHP drawdown is -5.64%. The current IBM drawdown is -29.10%.

RankBHPIBM
#1-76.24%
Apr 11, 2011 - Dec 4, 2020
-58.31%
Sep 1, 2000 - May 8, 2008
#2-73.74%
May 16, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010
-44.28%
Jul 22, 2008 - Oct 12, 2009
#3-42.56%
Jan 7, 2000 - Jul 25, 2003
-43.71%
Mar 14, 2013 - Nov 10, 2022
#4-37.26%
Dec 27, 2023 - Jan 5, 2026
-37.50%
Jun 2, 2026 - Jul 22, 2026
#5-33.79%
Oct 29, 2007 - May 6, 2008
-30.96%
Nov 12, 2025 - Jun 1, 2026
#6-31.11%
May 10, 2021 - Mar 3, 2022
-20.10%
Mar 27, 2000 - Aug 25, 2000
#7-30.30%
Jun 7, 2022 - Jan 6, 2023
-19.81%
Jun 30, 2025 - Oct 7, 2025
#8-26.07%
May 9, 2006 - Mar 26, 2007
-17.60%
Dec 13, 2022 - Aug 25, 2023
#9-23.83%
Jul 12, 2007 - Sep 18, 2007
-17.41%
Jan 21, 2000 - Mar 27, 2000
#10-22.08%
Feb 28, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005
-16.86%
Mar 12, 2024 - Aug 19, 2024
#11-21.84%
Apr 1, 2022 - Jun 2, 2022
-16.51%
Feb 20, 2025 - May 15, 2025
#12-20.65%
Jan 26, 2023 - Dec 21, 2023
-14.56%
Jul 19, 2011 - Oct 10, 2011
#13-20.54%
Feb 19, 2004 - Sep 21, 2004
-12.90%
Oct 14, 2024 - Dec 4, 2024
#14-19.75%
Mar 2, 2026 - May 6, 2026
-12.24%
Apr 3, 2012 - Oct 1, 2012
#15-15.94%
Jun 2, 2026 - Jul 8, 2026
-11.69%
Oct 16, 2012 - Mar 7, 2013

Correlation

Correlation between BHP and IBM is 0.84 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.84
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

BHP vs IBM dividend yield comparison.

YearBHPIBM
20261.66%1.44%
20253.64%2.27%
20245.98%3.03%
20234.98%4.05%
202222.44%4.68%
20219.98%4.74%
20203.67%5.17%
20198.59%4.80%
20184.89%5.46%
20173.61%3.85%
20161.68%3.31%
20159.38%3.63%
20145.11%2.65%
20133.40%1.97%
20122.86%1.72%
20112.86%1.58%
20101.87%1.70%
20092.14%1.64%
20083.26%2.26%
20071.34%1.39%
20061.76%1.13%
20051.68%0.95%
20041.50%0.71%
20031.70%0.68%
20022.35%0.76%
20012.45%0.45%
20001.92%0.60%
19990.56%0.11%

Select Stocks to Compare