BGT vs HPF
Comparison between BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT, ETF) and John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceBGT has outperformed HPF, delivering a return of +6.8% compared to +2.9%
BGT vs HPF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BGT vs HPF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BGT vs HPF - Annual Returns (2002 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BGT | HPF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.28% | +2.06% |
| 2025 | -1.46% | +5.47% |
| 2024 | +17.10% | +11.75% |
| 2023 | +25.02% | +9.70% |
| 2022 | -14.22% | -18.34% |
| 2021 | +26.55% | +19.11% |
| 2020 | -1.30% | -7.71% |
| 2019 | +17.15% | +24.95% |
| 2018 | -13.82% | -4.87% |
| 2017 | +4.04% | +13.87% |
| 2016 | +19.09% | +11.23% |
| 2015 | +2.40% | +3.45% |
| 2014 | -2.37% | +22.16% |
| 2013 | -3.09% | -12.91% |
| 2012 | +19.80% | +10.84% |
| 2011 | -11.00% | +22.05% |
| 2010 | +28.58% | +18.20% |
| 2009 | +80.65% | +34.03% |
| 2008 | -41.10% | -22.68% |
| 2007 | -10.63% | -20.11% |
| 2006 | +21.74% | +30.35% |
| 2005 | -1.79% | -7.39% |
| 2004 | -4.99% | +5.52% |
| 2003 | N/A | +13.94% |
| 2002 | N/A | -0.04% |
BGT vs HPF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BGT was -58.00%, occurring on Dec 15, 2008. Recovery took 643 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for HPF was -66.58%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 806 trading sessions.
The current BGT drawdown is -6.70%. The current HPF drawdown is -2.94%.
| Rank | BGT | HPF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -58.00% Jul 9, 2007 - Jan 26, 2010 | -66.58% May 10, 2007 - Jul 22, 2010 |
| #2 | -41.92% Jan 23, 2020 - Jan 15, 2021 | -54.74% Feb 19, 2020 - Apr 1, 2021 |
| #3 | -24.68% Dec 31, 2010 - Sep 12, 2012 | -31.20% Aug 30, 2021 - Sep 16, 2024 |
| #4 | -23.18% Dec 29, 2021 - Dec 14, 2023 | -24.59% May 8, 2013 - Jan 9, 2015 |
| #5 | -15.97% Mar 2, 2010 - Oct 1, 2010 | -21.13% Mar 31, 2004 - Nov 26, 2004 |
| #6 | -15.96% Mar 16, 2018 - Dec 4, 2019 | -17.84% Sep 12, 2018 - Jan 31, 2019 |
| #7 | -15.93% Dec 16, 2024 - Jul 2, 2025 | -16.95% Sep 8, 2016 - May 26, 2017 |
| #8 | -15.48% May 22, 2013 - Aug 24, 2016 | -16.90% Oct 10, 2024 - Apr 8, 2025 |
| #9 | -11.68% Sep 22, 2004 - Feb 10, 2006 | -15.14% Feb 9, 2005 - Mar 22, 2006 |
| #10 | -11.08% Aug 1, 2025 - Mar 27, 2026 | -13.58% Jul 22, 2011 - Aug 29, 2011 |
| #11 | -8.95% Oct 19, 2012 - Jan 3, 2013 | -11.26% Apr 24, 2015 - Jan 8, 2016 |
| #12 | -8.30% May 15, 2024 - Oct 30, 2024 | -11.24% Oct 16, 2012 - Mar 20, 2013 |
| #13 | -6.41% Apr 25, 2017 - Jan 2, 2018 | -9.84% Sep 9, 2010 - May 3, 2011 |
| #14 | -6.10% Oct 14, 2010 - Nov 30, 2010 | -9.53% Aug 3, 2017 - Jun 8, 2018 |
| #15 | -5.68% Feb 6, 2007 - Apr 5, 2007 | -9.52% Aug 31, 2011 - Dec 22, 2011 |
Correlation
Correlation between BGT and HPF is 0.95 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2026)
BGT vs HPF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BGT | HPF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 5.64% | 3.90% |
| 2025 | 12.74% | 9.22% |
| 2024 | 11.23% | 8.95% |
| 2023 | 10.36% | 9.39% |
| 2022 | 6.87% | 9.45% |
| 2021 | 5.55% | 7.10% |
| 2020 | 7.58% | 7.80% |
| 2019 | 6.33% | 7.32% |
| 2018 | 6.64% | 8.96% |
| 2017 | 5.03% | 7.82% |
| 2016 | 5.03% | 8.30% |
| 2015 | 6.04% | 7.85% |
| 2014 | 6.65% | 8.26% |
| 2013 | 6.41% | 9.39% |
| 2012 | 7.08% | 7.76% |
| 2011 | 8.11% | 8.41% |
| 2010 | 6.15% | 8.00% |
| 2009 | 6.90% | 9.10% |
| 2008 | 23.76% | 14.09% |
| 2007 | 10.08% | 9.97% |
| 2006 | 7.60% | 9.02% |
| 2005 | 7.13% | 10.32% |
| 2004 | 2.00% | 8.59% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 9.17% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks