BEP vs CTSH
Comparison between Brookfield Renewable Partners LP (BEP, Company) and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp - Class A (CTSH, Company).
BEP is from the Utilities sector, while CTSH is from the Technology sector.
5-Year PerformanceBEP has outperformed CTSH, delivering a return of +1.8% compared to -7.6%
BEP vs CTSH - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BEP vs CTSH - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BEP vs CTSH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BEP | CTSH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +21.28% | -46.48% |
| 2025 | +23.85% | +10.38% |
| 2024 | -7.33% | +5.04% |
| 2023 | +6.57% | +33.43% |
| 2022 | -26.60% | -35.16% |
| 2021 | -15.87% | +13.13% |
| 2020 | +84.05% | +34.18% |
| 2019 | +87.72% | -0.47% |
| 2018 | -20.95% | -9.57% |
| 2017 | +27.50% | +26.47% |
| 2016 | +24.01% | -3.61% |
| 2015 | -11.43% | +13.95% |
| 2014 | +23.95% | +6.56% |
| 2013 | -8.10% | +32.62% |
| 2012 | +11.06% | +12.42% |
| 2011 | +28.08% | -14.66% |
| 2010 | +74.08% | +56.60% |
| 2009 | +57.43% | +137.08% |
| 2008 | -27.47% | -43.97% |
| 2007 | +39.04% | -12.71% |
| 2006 | +18.81% | +52.28% |
| 2005 | +24.13% | +20.18% |
| 2004 | N/A | +79.90% |
| 2003 | N/A | +89.51% |
| 2002 | N/A | +88.30% |
| 2001 | N/A | +23.70% |
| 2000 | N/A | -24.36% |
| 1999 | N/A | +114.82% |
BEP vs CTSH Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BEP was -53.83%, occurring on Oct 3, 2023. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for CTSH was -71.38%, occurring on Oct 8, 2001. Recovery took 653 trading sessions.
The current BEP drawdown is -12.45%. The current CTSH drawdown is -51.27%.
| Rank | BEP | CTSH |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -53.83% Jan 22, 2021 - Oct 3, 2023 | -71.38% Mar 28, 2000 - Nov 4, 2002 |
| #2 | -45.44% Feb 19, 2020 - Jul 17, 2020 | -69.06% Feb 7, 2007 - Jan 13, 2010 |
| #3 | -37.27% Aug 28, 2008 - Oct 6, 2009 | -56.12% Feb 14, 2025 - Jun 30, 2026 |
| #4 | -32.14% Apr 16, 2015 - Jul 29, 2016 | -49.77% Mar 15, 2018 - May 3, 2021 |
| #5 | -25.77% Sep 8, 2017 - May 24, 2019 | -43.77% Mar 22, 2022 - Feb 13, 2025 |
| #6 | -19.98% Dec 31, 2007 - Aug 28, 2008 | -35.68% Dec 22, 1999 - Feb 8, 2000 |
| #7 | -19.32% May 1, 2013 - May 7, 2014 | -34.31% Apr 29, 2011 - Sep 18, 2013 |
| #8 | -17.08% Sep 18, 2006 - Dec 19, 2006 | -31.60% Oct 28, 2015 - Jul 20, 2017 |
| #9 | -16.67% Apr 8, 2010 - Oct 13, 2010 | -30.65% Dec 23, 2002 - Jul 2, 2003 |
| #10 | -16.48% Oct 27, 2011 - Jul 13, 2012 | -28.10% Jan 23, 2004 - Sep 9, 2004 |
| #11 | -15.16% Sep 6, 2016 - Apr 11, 2017 | -25.36% Mar 9, 2000 - Mar 24, 2000 |
| #12 | -15.06% Jul 21, 2011 - Sep 13, 2011 | -19.21% Mar 7, 2014 - Nov 7, 2014 |
| #13 | -13.77% Nov 7, 2007 - Dec 31, 2007 | -18.87% May 3, 2021 - Nov 12, 2021 |
| #14 | -12.08% Nov 25, 2014 - Jan 16, 2015 | -17.85% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 15, 2005 |
| #15 | -11.58% May 3, 2011 - Jul 20, 2011 | -17.00% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between BEP and CTSH is 0.80 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2005 - 2026)
BEP vs CTSH dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BEP | CTSH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.37% | 1.53% |
| 2025 | 5.53% | 1.49% |
| 2024 | 6.23% | 1.56% |
| 2023 | 5.14% | 1.54% |
| 2022 | 5.05% | 1.89% |
| 2021 | 4.42% | 1.08% |
| 2020 | 2.68% | 1.07% |
| 2019 | 4.42% | 1.29% |
| 2018 | 7.57% | 1.26% |
| 2017 | 5.36% | 0.63% |
| 2016 | 5.99% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 6.34% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 5.43% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 5.54% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 2.36% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 47.37% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 10.93% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 15.31% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 9.79% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 12.67% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 6.44% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks